Archae Solenhofen wrote:

> Why is that.... it's been claimed to be wiped clean of all
> evidence of such other than the stone blocks, which are claimed
> to be advanced in part because of imaginary evidences like
> "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"?

No, there are fewer than 100,000 stone blocks for the Great Pyramid with even closer tolerances than .01". The real question is why are people who believe in tombs and superstitious people can't see the lack of evidence for tombs and superstitious people. They can see the lack of evidence for space ships but are blind to both the absense of evidence for tombs and superstition and they are blind to the actual physical evidence.

You even snipped the part of my post about "The Great Saw Palace". I guess it's easier not to see close fitting joints and extensive evidence for things like machining and science if such things are merely ignored or deleted. They still exist just as doies the close joints inside the pyramid and the intricate layout. There is still 6 1/2 million tons of stone lifted far higher than any ancient economy could ever have lifted it using muscle alone. The evidence that Egyptologists try so studiously to ignore is still standing right in front of us.