Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thunderbird wrote:

> Nejc wrote:
>
> > This is funny... no histerical reaction from the
> > "experts"...???
>
> You were expecting hysterical laughter, perhaps?
>
> Sixteen years on, Don Barone quotes Jochmans, whose slapdash
> treatment of the question offended even Sitchin (by failing to
> credit him):
>
> M.....Moriarty? :)

Try the Author line.

> For those of us comfortable with the concept of mainstream
> science's gatekeeping having its doors kicked in,
>
> we understand everything from information forwards being taken
> or used by others,
> to complete obsession with topic themes,
> found....with Authors....and groups,.....and the searcher.
>
> The mature person who reasons will understand that critical
> information is to be found in the above,
> you can either faint before it,....or work it.
>
> playing sage against sage......or author against author has
> been a medium the Gatekeepers* ...use : )
>
> Whats next M,.....lectures on how the British have never
> conspired in their world adventurism,
> British East India Company......clean as a whistle : )
>
> LOL.....One gets the same 1000 yrd stare when confronting
> Americans about the same.....and False Flag events.
>
> so while your here....just a reminder that the Fabulous Khufu's
> don't actually fly around on wires and pull off Giza
> Plateau....all by themselves.
>
> excerpt:Alan Alford The Giza Adoption Theory
> 3 Inscriptions:

And when we finally get to it, your idea of a suitable source to back up Jochmans is . . . Alan Alford!

(Hysterical laughter.)

> The Inventory Stele, mentioned earlier, was supposedly written
> by the priests of the cult of Khufu during the 26th dynasty to
> praise the deeds of the ancient king. However, it makes no
> claim whatsoever that Khufu built the Great Pyramid. A very
> strange omission indeed if Khufu really did build the Pyramid.

Suggestion: try searching this very board.

[www.grahamhancock.com]

Note the question in the concluding paragraph: it’s one you likewise should answer.

> Moreover, 4th dynasty inscriptions found at Giza confirm that
> Khufu was building the mastaba fields for his high officials to
> the west of the Great Pyramid in ‘year 5’ of his reign. Is it
> really likely that Khufu, having initiated the largest, most
> complex and innovative pyramid-building project in Egyptian
> history, would have allowed any work to be carried out in
> building mastabas? Can we seriously believe that Khufu would
> have put his great venture at risk by diverting resources to
> the building of such mastabas in the fifth year of his reign,
> bearing in mind that he did not know whether he would live long
> enough to see the completion of his pyramid? The idea is
> ludicrous. The inscriptions only make sense if the Great
> Pyramid was already built before the time of Khufu. (As far as
> I know, I am the first person to have highlighted this anomaly;
> my thanks to Mark Lehner for mentioning it in his book ‘The
> Complete Pyramids’.)[end]

Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue, when he comes out with something as silly as this?

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 274 Ahatmose 10-Feb-12 19:53
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 130 Thunderbird 10-Feb-12 21:04
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 136 Nejc 12-Feb-12 13:35
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 152 Merrell 12-Feb-12 18:42
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 184 Martin Stower 13-Feb-12 19:05
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 204 Thunderbird 13-Feb-12 19:54
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 291 Martin Stower 14-Feb-12 15:59
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 110 DUNE 12-Feb-12 20:08
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 161 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 23:54
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 171 Nejc 14-Feb-12 11:45
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 130 Ahatmose 14-Feb-12 13:37
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 149 Nejc 14-Feb-12 13:45
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 125 DUNE 14-Feb-12 14:03
Re: Re-opening an old wound: The inscriptions of G1 re-visited. 152 Martin Stower 15-Feb-12 19:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.