> the first part richard goes to prove that chakras are not a new
> age concept wich a few people seem to belive.
> and its not just egypt that has these chakra points mapped on
> earth and each one is of different size
> there are two in timothy wallaces book, feel free to read and
> we can discuss it.
You are avoiding answering my questions. Please go back carefully and adress them one by one.
It is irrelevant when chakras were first believed in but it is relevant that you prove a CORRELATION between chakras and energy points on earth and how a valid pilgramage trail evolved. It's even more muddled now by you trying to bring supposed association with planets into the equation.