Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
"The 60 year Pacal connection is exquisite. By design? If so, then
it is a designer not human."

"Any honest appraisal of the data forces this conclusion, in my opinion,
again, unless one insists, because of their world view, that there
can be no such an agent. Then the logic of the secular model forces
one to conclude that such juxtapositions and similar data all MUST be
coincidental, because that is the only alternative the secular model
allow for if 'it' can't be explained in terms of human interaction."

Agreed. Stan (orthodox and a skeptic) indicated in his lenghty E-mail argument with JMJ that to prove up the coincidential into the not concidential (my wording) that the "coincidences" would by necessity have be statistically significance, and beyond what probability would produce.

To get the key data, a la Sir Francis Bacon, would require something like this:

"...From the ashes a fire shall be woken, a light from the shadows shall spring; renenwed shall be blade that was broken, the crownless again shall be king.”

The bulk of that key information presently is unavailable. Light shall spring from the shadows, and in this case the Light Bacon pursued all his very productive career, and as projected into the future. It will be interesting to see where things stand into early 2013. I don't think we are before the gates of Mordor yet.


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 230 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 18:48
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 71 lukehancock 02-Apr-11 19:12
and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 154 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 19:47
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 112 Merrell 02-Apr-11 21:32
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 95 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:57
surprise, surprise ! 82 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:06
Chef, please make your links clickable (n/t) 73 David L 24-Jun-11 01:44
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 69 carolb 02-Apr-11 20:29
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 92 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:55
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 80 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:09
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 82 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:16
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 77 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:24
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 86 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:35
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 66 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:38
recommended title 88 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 02:33
Re: recommended title 63 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 06:32
Re: recommended title 84 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 07:19
Re: recommended title 73 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 15:51
Re: recommended title 147 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 16:25
Re: recommended title 67 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 18:12
Re: recommended title 79 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 23:46
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 70 Merrell 22-Jun-11 22:20
my problem with this 84 Poster Boy 23-Jun-11 19:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.