Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
"The 60 year Pacal connection is exquisite. By design? If so, then
it is a designer not human."

"Any honest appraisal of the data forces this conclusion, in my opinion,
again, unless one insists, because of their world view, that there
can be no such an agent. Then the logic of the secular model forces
one to conclude that such juxtapositions and similar data all MUST be
coincidental, because that is the only alternative the secular model
allow for if 'it' can't be explained in terms of human interaction."

Agreed. Stan (orthodox and a skeptic) indicated in his lenghty E-mail argument with JMJ that to prove up the coincidential into the not concidential (my wording) that the "coincidences" would by necessity have be statistically significance, and beyond what probability would produce.

To get the key data, a la Sir Francis Bacon, would require something like this:

"...From the ashes a fire shall be woken, a light from the shadows shall spring; renenwed shall be blade that was broken, the crownless again shall be king.”

The bulk of that key information presently is unavailable. Light shall spring from the shadows, and in this case the Light Bacon pursued all his very productive career, and as projected into the future. It will be interesting to see where things stand into early 2013. I don't think we are before the gates of Mordor yet.


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 170 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 18:48
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 47 lukehancock 02-Apr-11 19:12
and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 85 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 19:47
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 72 Merrell 02-Apr-11 21:32
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 58 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:57
surprise, surprise ! 48 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:06
Chef, please make your links clickable (n/t) 50 David L 24-Jun-11 01:44
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 43 carolb 02-Apr-11 20:29
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 52 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:55
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 51 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:09
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 54 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:16
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 51 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:24
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 52 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:35
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 43 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:38
recommended title 58 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 02:33
Re: recommended title 41 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 06:32
Re: recommended title 50 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 07:19
Re: recommended title 47 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 15:51
Re: recommended title 85 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 16:25
Re: recommended title 42 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 18:12
Re: recommended title 48 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 23:46
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 45 Merrell 22-Jun-11 22:20
my problem with this 54 Poster Boy 23-Jun-11 19:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.