Thanks for the email link, I will look forward to checking it out
later when I have time.
"Many of your points are outside of the scholarly realm."
Understood! Yet the data is utterly primary.
"The 60 year Pacal connection is exquisite. By design? If so, then
it is a designer not human."
Any honest appraisal of the data forces this conclusion, in my opinion,
again, unless one insists, because of their world view, that there
can be no such an agent. Then the logic of the secular model forces
one to conclude that such juxtapositions and similar data all MUST be
coincidental, because that is the only alternative the secular model
allow for if 'it' can't be explained in terms of human interaction.
Post Edited (04-Apr-11 16:30)