Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Chef,

There are Maya academic scholars who have looked into the 2012 claims.

Dr. Ed Barnhart, who founded the Maya Exploration Center, has been giving lectures on it for the last 4 years. I had conversations with him on this topic in August of 2007. Ed has always spoken well of John Jenkins.

Last night I read the entire E-mail exchange that occured on the MEC website. I was impressed with the quality of the exhanges. John has managed to cultivate relationships with Maya scholars to his benefit. There is a lot of research existing or being conducted that is unpublished. John now has some access to unpublished information and he earned it.

I saw the exchange boiled down in essence to whether or not the upcoming 13th Baktun is the end of a great cycle and whether there are hidden and very subtle clues in the record where the king was being linked to the 13th Baktun and the Dark Rift. John is trying to make that case. His opponent Stan is of the opinion that the 20th Baktun is the end of a great cycle and not the 13th. Stan uses the clear Pacal reference where he is linked to the 20th (plus 8 days) Baktun. This is a date that occures on 4772 A.D. John is dismissive of the Pacal reference judging from his tone in his E-mails on point.

I have waited for over 8 years to see if the Pacal connector date of 4772 A.D. would emerge in the 2012 discussion. An interesting aside, Pacal's tomb was found in July, 1952. The 13th Baktun date will occur in the 60th arriversary year of the discovery.

It took the academic argument between John and Stan to bring out the Pacal card out of the deck.


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 306 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 18:48
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 109 lukehancock 02-Apr-11 19:12
and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 217 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 19:47
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 157 Merrell 02-Apr-11 21:32
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 149 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:57
surprise, surprise ! 123 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:06
Chef, please make your links clickable (n/t) 119 David L 24-Jun-11 01:44
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 98 carolb 02-Apr-11 20:29
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 144 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:55
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 121 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:09
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 130 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:16
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 117 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:24
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 125 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:35
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 98 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:38
recommended title 126 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 02:33
Re: recommended title 88 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 06:32
Re: recommended title 121 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 07:19
Re: recommended title 115 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 15:51
Re: recommended title 186 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 16:25
Re: recommended title 101 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 18:12
Re: recommended title 121 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 23:46
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 106 Merrell 22-Jun-11 22:20
my problem with this 136 Poster Boy 23-Jun-11 19:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.