> Apologies if I offended, Carolb. Didn't mean to.
> It's just that my take on 2012 has nothing to do with
> psychedelics 'and' my understanding of JMJ's work is that the
> strength of his theories, which seem
> to rest entirely on celestial alignments and various
> inscriptions on Mayan
> monuments (the archeology of it all) have nothing to do with
> altered states
> of consciousness.
> I skimmed over the link you provided and see that maybe there
> is a tie-in
> in all of this. But why don't you ask John directly, and see if
> he won't mind
> having his reply to you posted here? I'm sure if your
> questions are on point
> and relevant he will reply. But really, you should ask him
Well, you're the one in contact, so I thought it was obvious that you'd question him!! ;-)
I was wondering if his life had been transformed by the use of these drugs, as our host, GH's has been (at least, that's my take on it after reading Supernatural). I was wondering if he believed the Maya had 'told' him things about the future. I haven't read his book, so I can't tell if he has gone into this in detail, and if he thinks it's a good thing for the public in general to use these drugs.
It's not urgent to know these answers, but if he brings it up in the context of your correspondence with him, maybe you could let us know what he says.