Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Merrel

Well wouldn't you know it? Just after getting in and checking on the board
here I then went to one of my emails and found that John had actually
directly addressed your question. Again, I would encourage you to follow
up with him directly and if it is fine, to post whatever excerpts you consider
to be relevant to the board.

You can reply to Merrel as follows. I don't believe you understand the point I made about the nuclear bulge being a visually perceivable astronomical feature, in distinction to the abstract point that astronomers believe should be what the Maya were seeing. The question is: is there evidence that the Maya thought of the Galactic Center (the features wihtin the nuclear bulge) as a center and birthplace? The answer is yes, and I went into detail on the Critique Clearinghouse page that I updated this morning. So, I would urge that continuing critics read and comment on what I wrote, otherwise I'll just have to keep recapitulating what I have already said numerous times. And we could go back and forth forever; I don;t have the time and it's why I write the books. Best to read MC2012 as well as Galactic Alignment and The 2012 Story. In addition, the astronomers at astrocrud are singularly uniderinformed about Maya astronomy and how it works; like David Morrison at NASA, they are prejudicially oriented to debunking anything connected to 2012 and are unwilling or unable to assess my work rationally. I have a rather large file of exhanges with astronomers who take bad definitions of the galactic alignment and then torch it -- that's the straw man tactic of the devote debunker priest. I believe that many astronomers and Western scholar blindly react to such a discussion because they support the superiority complex of western science. Advanced astronomy among hte ancient Maya? It cannot be allowed. You'd think they'd like to expand their horizons and learn something about the Maya calendar and Maya astronomy as well as the evidence that the ancient Maya, for example at Tortuguero, were aware that on 13.0.0.0.0 (December 21, 2012) the sun will be aligned with the Crossroads at the southern terminus of the dark rift, on the solstice. Instead, we go around and around on basement level nitpickery that has already been responded to dozens of times, in personal emails, other chat boards, in my books, interviews, and web pages. Let's look at the evidence for how the Maya tracked the sidereal year and precession accurately, and the new evidence form Tortuguero Monument 6 -- I provided a link to my SAA paper within the MEC-Facebook discussion on [johnmajorjenkins.com]. Best wishes,

John Major Jenkins
p.s. --- Hi Luke! Thanks for the supportive comments and the link to our interview.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 287 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 18:48
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 95 lukehancock 02-Apr-11 19:12
and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 193 Poster Boy 02-Apr-11 19:47
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 142 Merrell 02-Apr-11 21:32
Re: and now, the moment you've been waiting for . . . 131 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:57
surprise, surprise ! 111 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:06
Chef, please make your links clickable (n/t) 104 David L 24-Jun-11 01:44
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 89 carolb 02-Apr-11 20:29
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 122 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 00:55
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 112 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:09
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 109 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:16
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 101 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:24
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 115 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 01:35
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 89 carolb 03-Apr-11 01:38
recommended title 116 Poster Boy 03-Apr-11 02:33
Re: recommended title 81 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 06:32
Re: recommended title 109 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 07:19
Re: recommended title 108 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 15:51
Re: recommended title 175 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 16:25
Re: recommended title 94 turnofthetide 04-Apr-11 18:12
Re: recommended title 109 Poster Boy 04-Apr-11 23:46
Re: John Major Jenkins replies re 2012 100 Merrell 22-Jun-11 22:20
my problem with this 115 Poster Boy 23-Jun-11 19:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.