Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking wrote:

> charly wrote:
>
> > Typical tactic of pseudo archaeology, take a modern day
> concept
> > an try to make it seem ancient cultures already had the same
> > concept. Make the evidence fit and in case there's not enough
> > evidence to be distorted make up some more. Oh, yes...almost
> > forgot, any evidence that points to the contrary has to be
> > ignored, dismissed or ridiculed (sarcophagi need to become
> > "stone boxes", etc.)
>
> There's probably a little truth here but you're missing the big
> picture. The big picture is that egyptology just made a bunch
> of assumptions and went from there. They skipped ahead to the
> answers and then set out to prove them. This is how a stone
> box became a sarcophagus in the first place.

The typology of sarcophagi is well known, no need to declare them "stone boxes".

> If you were right that the stone box is a sarcophagus etc etc
> then why are there no answers?

Answers for what?

> Why have you still been unable
> to prove the pyramid was a tomb even after 150 years????

Has been proven, you just don't accept the proof...

> You're best evidence is still just that the pyramid was built
> around a stone box which was simply assumed to be a sarcophagus
> in the first place.

No one has a problem with the fact that a mastaba built around a "stone box" is a tomb. No one has a problem with the fact that those "stone boxes" are called sarcophagi.
The architectural evidence speaks volumes, no matter how hard you try to dismiss, ignore or ridicule it. It will just not go away...

> Like everything orthodox this is absurd.

Not accepting sarcophagi is absurd in the light of the evidence...

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 449 cladking 16-Feb-11 03:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:05
BTW... 202 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:16
Re: BTW... 264 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 232 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:18
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 238 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:31
To save time.. 200 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 231 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 224 Titus Livius 16-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 192 cladking 16-Feb-11 16:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 191 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 03:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 238 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:14
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 187 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 05:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 197 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 228 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 08:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 164 Avatar 19-Feb-11 01:59
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 167 Elizabeth Newton 20-Feb-11 02:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 185 cladking 20-Feb-11 03:19
The Abu Simbel Experience 188 will2learn2000 16-Feb-11 16:19
Re: The Abu Simbel Experience 251 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 205 Ronald1 16-Feb-11 23:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 215 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 07:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 275 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 161 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 06:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 206 cladking 18-Feb-11 17:29
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 215 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 18:03
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 215 charly 19-Feb-11 10:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 MJT 19-Feb-11 22:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 239 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 210 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 23:50
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 236 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 154 Ronald1 20-Feb-11 08:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 203 OCaptain 17-Feb-11 14:25
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 239 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 188 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 12:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 230 MJT 19-Feb-11 13:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 186 MJT 19-Feb-11 21:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 264 cladking 19-Feb-11 23:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 MJT 22-Feb-11 09:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 220 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:15
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 222 MJT 22-Feb-11 20:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 230 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:40
Re: on cenotaphs 229 charly 21-Feb-11 12:49
Re: on cenotaphs 223 cladking 21-Feb-11 16:23
Re: on sceptres 206 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 17:49
Re: on sceptres 214 cladking 21-Feb-11 23:39
Re: on sceptres 215 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 08:46
Re: on sceptres 179 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:54
Re: on sceptres 266 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 17:19
Re: on sceptres 176 cladking 22-Feb-11 18:15
Re: on sceptres 173 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 19:02
Re: on sceptres 172 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:12
Re: on sceptres 210 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:47
Re: on sceptres 198 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:55
Re: on sceptres & shafts 233 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 06:23
Re: on sceptres & shafts 185 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:44
Re: on sceptres & shafts 202 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 18:36
Re: on sceptres & shafts 230 cladking 24-Feb-11 18:57
Re: on sceptres & shafts 238 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:32
Re: on sceptres & shafts 191 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:49
Re: on sceptres & shafts 168 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:09
Re: on sceptres & shafts 222 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:16
Re: on sceptres & shafts 224 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:48
Re: on sceptres & shafts 246 cladking 24-Feb-11 20:12
Re: on sceptres & shafts 169 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:39
Re: on sceptres & shafts 232 cladking 24-Feb-11 21:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 247 charly 21-Feb-11 17:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 210 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 18:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 244 charly 21-Feb-11 20:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 230 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 232 charly 22-Feb-11 09:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 182 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 11:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 201 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 190 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 18:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 246 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:04
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 214 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 23:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 210 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:40
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 236 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 226 charly 22-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 180 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:52
Re: Other ancient Structures 195 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 18:05
Use of common sense obligatory 203 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 07:52
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 227 charly 22-Feb-11 09:12
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 195 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 13:08
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 219 charly 22-Feb-11 13:51
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 173 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:25
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 183 charly 22-Feb-11 19:55
Re: Use of common sense rare 190 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 207 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:05
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 199 cladking 22-Feb-11 00:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 211 charly 22-Feb-11 10:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 195 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 206 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:52
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 201 charly 22-Feb-11 20:00
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 209 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 223 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 09:08
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 228 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 171 charly 23-Feb-11 10:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 232 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 206 charly 23-Feb-11 17:24
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 213 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:51
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 181 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:58
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 212 charly 24-Feb-11 08:53
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 204 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:52
Re: on cenotaphs 211 MJT 21-Feb-11 22:09
Re: on cenotaphs 211 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 228 cladking 18-Feb-11 18:05
Re: Shemsu Hor 204 Thunderbird 18-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 243 cladking 03-Aug-11 03:34


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.