Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking wrote:

> No! Direct evidence could be anything. For instance Khufu's
> brother could be buried right next to G1 and an inscription in
> his tomb might read that he wanted to be buried next to his
> brother. Well guess what? Khufu's brother really is buried
> right next to G1 but the inscription says he wanted to be
> buried next to "Khufu's Horizon".

"Khufu's Horizon" is the name of Khufu's funerary complex, why woudn't his brother use that name? Nothing weird about that.

> There is no direct evidence of any type that any great pyramid
> was a tomb. If there were mortal remains or something that
> would constitute proof as well as direct evidence but
> egyptology isn't even seeking such evidence since it is just
> assumed these were tombs.

If you dismiss architectural evidence then there's indeed no proof, but it's there and it won't go away no matter how much you would like that Cladking.

> > No, there's archaeological evidence for ramps while there's
> no
> > evidence for geysers or complicated machinery. Geyser powered
> > machines exist only in your (and some others) immagination.
> > Machinery some more some less complex (even with
> > counterweights) have been proposed by egyptology, but at
> least
> > they admit there's no evidence that such technology was
> > available in the OK.
>
> So if you know so much and have all this information that
> proves what was and wasn't in existence praytell what's under
> the tons of bat guano in the cave by G2? Why were there no
> ramp builders buried? What were the sceptres for? Wht's an
> ankh? Why is there no proof of what the pyramids did?

What has any of this to do with what I wrote just above?

> Have you really forgotten you can see the evidence of
> counterweights with your own eyes. Just google pyramids egypt
> images and look at all those vertical lines. Just lines didn't
> just form there after constrution. They are built right into
> it. This is exactly the evidence you'd expect to have been
> left by counterweights.

Let's assume for arguments sake that the lines where made by some kind of machine using counterweights, then you still have no evidence that such a machine would use water as countyerweights or was somehow "geyserpowered".

> > There are answers, not to everything and yes there are
> > assumptions and guesses and egyptology has never denied that
>
> Maybe after the big questions are answered I'll have some
> interest in the little questions that egyptology has done a
> superb job of investigating. But I started this with a simple
> question and egyptology has still not answered me or lifted a
> finger to learn; how did they lift the stones for G1.
>
> Answer this first. It just might have some bearing on what the
> ancients believed and it might help answer the little
> questions.

How did they lift the stones for G1 (and pyramids in general)? Egyptology has no conclusive answer, ramps were involved but other means such as some type machinery are not excluded. But you already knew this of course.

> But I want a real answer or at the very least that someone is
> seeking one.

Egyptology is seeking answers Cladking, whether you believe it or not...

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 442 cladking 16-Feb-11 03:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 190 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:05
BTW... 196 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:16
Re: BTW... 251 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:18
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 234 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:31
To save time.. 188 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 201 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 Titus Livius 16-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 185 cladking 16-Feb-11 16:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 182 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 03:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:14
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 176 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 05:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 187 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 08:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 155 Avatar 19-Feb-11 01:59
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 157 Elizabeth Newton 20-Feb-11 02:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 172 cladking 20-Feb-11 03:19
The Abu Simbel Experience 181 will2learn2000 16-Feb-11 16:19
Re: The Abu Simbel Experience 238 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 194 Ronald1 16-Feb-11 23:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 207 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 204 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 07:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 263 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 148 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 06:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 cladking 18-Feb-11 17:29
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 18:03
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 205 charly 19-Feb-11 10:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 183 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 207 MJT 19-Feb-11 22:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 23:50
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 224 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 143 Ronald1 20-Feb-11 08:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 191 OCaptain 17-Feb-11 14:25
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 179 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 12:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 220 MJT 19-Feb-11 13:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 186 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 176 MJT 19-Feb-11 21:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 253 cladking 19-Feb-11 23:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 204 MJT 22-Feb-11 09:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:15
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 MJT 22-Feb-11 20:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 220 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:40
Re: on cenotaphs 213 charly 21-Feb-11 12:49
Re: on cenotaphs 213 cladking 21-Feb-11 16:23
Re: on sceptres 199 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 17:49
Re: on sceptres 205 cladking 21-Feb-11 23:39
Re: on sceptres 203 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 08:46
Re: on sceptres 166 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:54
Re: on sceptres 255 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 17:19
Re: on sceptres 170 cladking 22-Feb-11 18:15
Re: on sceptres 156 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 19:02
Re: on sceptres 163 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:12
Re: on sceptres 202 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:47
Re: on sceptres 186 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:55
Re: on sceptres & shafts 227 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 06:23
Re: on sceptres & shafts 175 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:44
Re: on sceptres & shafts 191 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 18:36
Re: on sceptres & shafts 218 cladking 24-Feb-11 18:57
Re: on sceptres & shafts 223 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:32
Re: on sceptres & shafts 180 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:49
Re: on sceptres & shafts 158 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:09
Re: on sceptres & shafts 208 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:16
Re: on sceptres & shafts 213 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:48
Re: on sceptres & shafts 237 cladking 24-Feb-11 20:12
Re: on sceptres & shafts 159 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:39
Re: on sceptres & shafts 209 cladking 24-Feb-11 21:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 234 charly 21-Feb-11 17:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 18:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 232 charly 21-Feb-11 20:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 221 charly 22-Feb-11 09:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 171 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 11:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 188 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 174 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 18:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 234 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:04
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 23:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 199 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:40
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 charly 22-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 174 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:52
Re: Other ancient Structures 184 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 18:05
Use of common sense obligatory 199 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 07:52
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 213 charly 22-Feb-11 09:12
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 184 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 13:08
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 208 charly 22-Feb-11 13:51
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 163 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:25
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 174 charly 22-Feb-11 19:55
Re: Use of common sense rare 182 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:05
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 187 cladking 22-Feb-11 00:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 201 charly 22-Feb-11 10:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 183 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 189 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:52
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 190 charly 22-Feb-11 20:00
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 210 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 09:08
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 162 charly 23-Feb-11 10:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 221 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 195 charly 23-Feb-11 17:24
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:51
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 173 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:58
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 200 charly 24-Feb-11 08:53
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 192 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:52
Re: on cenotaphs 188 MJT 21-Feb-11 22:09
Re: on cenotaphs 201 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 222 cladking 18-Feb-11 18:05
Re: Shemsu Hor 199 Thunderbird 18-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 225 cladking 03-Aug-11 03:34


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.