Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking wrote:

> I doubt egyptology is completely mistaken about everything
> after the 5th dynasty. I have no reason to believe they are
> wrong about anything after the 5th dynasty.
>
> But all the known facts suggest they are mistaken about almost
> everything before the 5th dynasty. I'm referring here to the
> important things like how and why they built the pyramids and
> what these people believed. I'm not suggesting thy're wrong
> about where the provincial capitals were or who was buried in
> Campbell's tomb (if anyone).

There are no facts to suggest such a thing.

> The builders of the great pyramids distinctly and repeatedly
> said the great pyramids were not tombs.

I know you believe that, no need to repeat that in every post.

They never suggested
> that the king needed to memorize 20,000 words to read to the
> Gods and attain the afterlife. The people did not believe the
> things egyptologists ascribe to them. It would have been
> impossible to build the pyramids the way egyptologists say they
> "mustta".

Why would that be immpossible? Building a complicated machine that was geyserpowered using water as counterweights is a 1000 times more "impossible". Especially since there's no evidence for geysers and no evidence for complicated machinery. Pulling stone blocks up ramps is realistic and reasonable.

> The builders said that the Gods built the pyramids
> by getting out the boats, ropes, and ladders.

> These people were not sun addled.

No one claims such a thing.

> They knew what they were
> saying and meant what they said. The king and the stones went
> to heaven in a boat that flew up and alit. This agrees with
> the evidence as well.

I seriously doubt that...(exept the part "they knew what they were saying")

> You won't argue any of these facts because you already know the
> evidence is on my side.

Problem is...they aren't facts... and I know for a 100% that the evidence isn't on your side (since you don't have any).

> The words of the builders are on my
> side.

I know you believe that.

> Egyptology is wrong and the proof is they don't know any
> of the 17 sceptres, the ankh, or anything important about the
> builders.

What do 17 sceptres and the ankh have to do with actual pyramid building? Answer: nothing at all.

Problem is: you assume that the PT must be taken literaly which is of course a wrong assumption. Then you procede to give hidden meanings to Gods, sceptres etc. which has nothing to do with literal meaning but everything with personal interpretation (I know that you don't accept this, don't know why though since it's obvious for almost everyone). Using a method like this you make "fit" whatever you want of course. Then you continue to claim this "literal meaning" concerns the so-called "great pyramids" and not the pyramids the PT were found in...
Egyptologists are very carefull when claiming a certain part of the PT is older; there has to be evidence for the existence of the gods / rituals etc. mentioned for example. Even then they are carefull to make conclusions since atributes and meanings of gods are known to evolve. A god in the PT that we know existed already in the 2nd dyn might not have had a certain attribute, meaning etc. in the 2nd dyn that is ascribed to him in the PT.
Yet you somehow seem to know how to pinpoint the parts that concern the "great pyramids"... I don't think so.

Fact is: you don't have a shred of archaeological evidence to support your claims.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 441 cladking 16-Feb-11 03:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 190 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:05
BTW... 196 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:16
Re: BTW... 251 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:18
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 234 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:31
To save time.. 188 Pete Vanderzwet 16-Feb-11 06:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 200 cladking 16-Feb-11 06:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 Titus Livius 16-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 185 cladking 16-Feb-11 16:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 182 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 03:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:14
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 176 Pete Vanderzwet 17-Feb-11 05:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 187 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 08:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 155 Avatar 19-Feb-11 01:59
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 157 Elizabeth Newton 20-Feb-11 02:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 172 cladking 20-Feb-11 03:19
The Abu Simbel Experience 181 will2learn2000 16-Feb-11 16:19
Re: The Abu Simbel Experience 238 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 193 Ronald1 16-Feb-11 23:46
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 207 cladking 17-Feb-11 05:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 203 Ronald1 17-Feb-11 07:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 263 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 148 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 06:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 cladking 18-Feb-11 17:29
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 18-Feb-11 18:03
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 205 charly 19-Feb-11 10:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 183 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 207 MJT 19-Feb-11 22:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 196 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 23:50
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 224 cladking 20-Feb-11 00:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 143 Ronald1 20-Feb-11 08:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 191 OCaptain 17-Feb-11 14:25
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 17-Feb-11 22:47
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 179 Ronald1 19-Feb-11 12:42
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 219 MJT 19-Feb-11 13:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 186 cladking 19-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 176 MJT 19-Feb-11 21:43
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 253 cladking 19-Feb-11 23:22
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 204 MJT 22-Feb-11 09:35
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:15
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:26
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 MJT 22-Feb-11 20:49
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 220 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:40
Re: on cenotaphs 213 charly 21-Feb-11 12:49
Re: on cenotaphs 213 cladking 21-Feb-11 16:23
Re: on sceptres 198 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 17:49
Re: on sceptres 205 cladking 21-Feb-11 23:39
Re: on sceptres 203 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 08:46
Re: on sceptres 166 cladking 22-Feb-11 16:54
Re: on sceptres 255 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 17:19
Re: on sceptres 170 cladking 22-Feb-11 18:15
Re: on sceptres 156 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 19:02
Re: on sceptres 163 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:12
Re: on sceptres 202 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:47
Re: on sceptres 186 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:55
Re: on sceptres & shafts 227 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 06:23
Re: on sceptres & shafts 174 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:44
Re: on sceptres & shafts 191 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 18:36
Re: on sceptres & shafts 218 cladking 24-Feb-11 18:57
Re: on sceptres & shafts 223 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:32
Re: on sceptres & shafts 180 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:49
Re: on sceptres & shafts 158 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:09
Re: on sceptres & shafts 208 cladking 24-Feb-11 19:16
Re: on sceptres & shafts 213 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 19:48
Re: on sceptres & shafts 237 cladking 24-Feb-11 20:12
Re: on sceptres & shafts 159 will2learn2000 24-Feb-11 20:39
Re: on sceptres & shafts 209 cladking 24-Feb-11 21:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 233 charly 21-Feb-11 17:54
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 will2learn2000 21-Feb-11 18:56
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 232 charly 21-Feb-11 20:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 218 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 221 charly 22-Feb-11 09:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 171 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 11:28
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 188 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:32
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 173 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 18:39
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 234 cladking 22-Feb-11 19:04
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 208 Ronald1 22-Feb-11 23:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 199 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:40
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 227 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:13
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 charly 22-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 174 cladking 22-Feb-11 22:52
Re: Other ancient Structures 184 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 18:05
Use of common sense obligatory 199 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 07:52
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 213 charly 22-Feb-11 09:12
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 184 will2learn2000 22-Feb-11 13:08
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 208 charly 22-Feb-11 13:51
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 163 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:25
Re: Use of common sense obligatory 174 charly 22-Feb-11 19:55
Re: Use of common sense rare 182 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:05
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 187 cladking 22-Feb-11 00:16
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 201 charly 22-Feb-11 10:19
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 183 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:37
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 189 cladking 22-Feb-11 17:52
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 190 charly 22-Feb-11 20:00
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 cladking 22-Feb-11 23:38
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 210 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 09:08
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 216 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:11
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 162 charly 23-Feb-11 10:17
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 221 cladking 23-Feb-11 16:06
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 194 charly 23-Feb-11 17:24
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 198 will2learn2000 23-Feb-11 17:51
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 173 cladking 23-Feb-11 21:58
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 200 charly 24-Feb-11 08:53
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 192 cladking 24-Feb-11 15:52
Re: on cenotaphs 188 MJT 21-Feb-11 22:09
Re: on cenotaphs 201 cladking 22-Feb-11 01:21
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 222 cladking 18-Feb-11 18:05
Re: Shemsu Hor 199 Thunderbird 18-Feb-11 19:41
Re: Othodox egyptology is necessarily wrong. 224 cladking 03-Aug-11 03:34


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.