Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 336 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 255 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 209 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 217 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 208 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 223 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 215 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 292 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 244 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 242 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 257 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 205 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 252 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 230 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 230 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 215 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 204 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 158 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 215 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 245 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 251 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 246 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 250 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 220 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 228 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 268 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 233 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 210 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 268 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 232 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 233 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 217 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 228 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 263 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 213 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 212 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 240 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 178 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 218 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 240 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 208 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 208 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 262 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 254 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 200 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 215 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 199 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 229 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 246 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 229 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 236 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 250 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 205 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 205 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 227 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 233 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 288 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 259 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 208 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 224 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 221 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 265 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 224 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 297 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 235 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 243 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 282 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 254 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 229 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 213 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 258 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 249 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 200 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.