Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 355 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 253 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 292 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 256 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 273 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 243 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 240 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 228 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 228 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 177 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 234 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 221 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 260 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 259 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 249 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 253 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 264 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 242 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 261 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 262 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 230 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 236 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 250 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 244 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 251 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 221 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 282 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 250 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 256 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 260 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 246 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 229 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 224 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 254 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 186 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 237 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 256 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 225 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 223 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 272 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 263 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 218 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 225 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 210 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 240 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 258 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 240 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 259 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 261 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 216 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 217 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 238 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 248 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 303 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 273 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 233 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 236 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 234 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 282 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 246 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 312 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 249 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 292 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 249 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 263 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 268 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 242 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 219 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 231 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 209 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.