Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 381 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 259 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 249 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 259 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 265 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 257 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 253 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 201 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 273 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 283 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 284 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 254 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 254 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 278 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 240 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 300 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 248 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 269 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 258 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 252 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 246 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 201 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 267 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 373 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 280 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 249 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 261 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 292 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 288 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 256 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 247 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 234 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 268 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 276 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 263 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 283 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 281 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 234 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 235 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 250 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 274 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 317 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 287 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 255 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 256 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 257 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 313 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 275 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 332 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 274 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 273 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 253 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 320 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 273 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 292 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 258 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 241 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 261 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 227 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.