Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<<<<> How have I insulted you??
>
> The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the
> content posted.
>
> > If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> > one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> > Information
> >
> > what was I to conclude?
>
> Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the
> character with one statement..
> However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem
> data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
>
> for Pete's sake!!!

the comment "what was i to conclude" informs us...that a "conclusion" has been reached. I'm pointing out that you have displayed a conflict of methodolgy in that enables you to make "conclusions" regarding the "individual" presenting.... however, is not applied for the actual data being presented.

For Pete's sake is right!

>
> I offered sources of info to Titus
>
> You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info

No, I simply did not convey my thoughts on the matter clearly enough for you to gauge what i was intending....
>
> "i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
>
> what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for
> Titus

>see above. systems analysts ..."Analyze" everything.

>
> "of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
>
> "I am a system analyst."

What is your point? A system Analyst qualifies as an expert opinion on the topic of AE?

> I trust that you are convinced that your observations are
> correct..

I believe the math is correct, yes. And, given that the math was extracted via ancient rhinds, objects,art and structures all linked... then it appears to convey intention..
hence, why I am detrmined to obtain feedback.

> now can you place your observations with a cultural context or
> not??

Is not binding the EMP/RMP with the GP sufficient enough? This relates to the mathematical engineering processes...not the "meaning" behind the GP. the knew math... building a structure of that magnitude wouldrequire math... we find correlating data in the units of both structure and rhind.

>
> "You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws
> in character."
>
> I have done nothing of the sort
>
> I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character

okay.

> I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now
> you have told me I am misguided for doing so

not so... the twisted interpretations have to stop. Isimply stated that it would be irresponsible to take anyones word versus doing the work yourself to test it.
>
> If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward
> maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to
> discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians

Fortunately for you, the AE had a simpler system of math and only requires visual understanding versus pages of mathematical calculations... :)
ofcourse they both have to be joined to prove the theorems.

this line of discussion appears unproductive and is caught in a cyclic spin.
please either review the data and offer what ever you feel ...
Or, simply go the other direction. I cannot waste anymore time here.

Thanks for "trying"....


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 324 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 252 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 199 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 196 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 213 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 204 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 282 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 233 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 270 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 201 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 227 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 205 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 192 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 147 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 194 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 230 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 240 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 209 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 217 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 260 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 221 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 198 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 252 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 211 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 216 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 254 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 224 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 251 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 202 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 199 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 229 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 174 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 203 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 229 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 197 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 207 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 252 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 250 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 196 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 203 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 188 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 226 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 235 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 218 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 224 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 235 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 195 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 194 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 215 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 223 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 277 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 247 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 195 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 210 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 203 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 253 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 213 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 285 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 223 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 196 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 226 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 232 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 270 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 196 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 202 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 188 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.