The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the content posted.
> If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> what was I to conclude?
Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the character with one statement..
However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
for Pete's sake!!!
I offered sources of info to Titus
You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info
"i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for Titus
"of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
"I am a system analyst."
I trust that you are convinced that your observations are correct..
now can you place your observations with a cultural context or not??
"You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws in character."
I have done nothing of the sort
I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character
I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now you have told me I am misguided for doing so
If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians
I leave the maths disputes to the mathematicians
either suggest some avenues of research for Titus..or not
But please stop all this Nonsenses about being insulted by me
No insult of any kind was intended
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."
Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019