> How have I insulted you??
The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the content posted.
> If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> what was I to conclude?
Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the character with one statement..
However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem data extracted from the ancients?
i see conflict in methodology. sorry.
> as for your theory you have as yet NOT posed any questions
> relating to Cultural collaboration of same.
The Rhind units match the GP units and that is not culturally related?
> You say your maths are correct...why should I question you on
becasue it would be irresponsible to take anybodys word without putting in the time to see for yourself.
> Shouldn't I assume that when one offers an expert opinion that
> it is?
of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion? I think mywork is labeled as "layman" out of respect for those that have the credentials.
> and equally shouldn't the alternate theorist assume that the
> egyptologist is answering honestly and ttbohk?
You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws in character.