Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<> 1. I cannot reply here without first referring you to the
> Hall
> > of Ma'at as a site where evidence comes first
>
> Not in my experience Mr Warwick. "evidence" has been presented
> @ Ma'at and in my opinion ignored or not properly addressed by
> those that convey a level of knowledge and understanding of the
> AE above and beyond anybody else that tries to present
> evidenced data that has the potential to alter orthodox beliefs
> if not disproven.>>
>
> That's too bad
>
> Strange then that the likes that of Robert Bauval have used the
> site to vet their ideas since it's inception
>
> There is allways the possibility that what you presented is not
> correct

There also exists the possibility that it is correct Warwick. given i stated they are "proven" theorems....and, I show you how they were derived from the GP structure then correlate to the AE Rhind.

> "> 2. the best site for debunking theory is not on the
> > internet..it is your public library.
>
>
> disagree. Books @ a library are only a snapshot of historical
> data and understandings at the time of their print."
>
> but the books in print ARE Dated...Where else do you suggest
> one gets a background in AE history??

I'm simply conveying that what one sets their foundation upon must be revisted and tested for any "new" information that might apply if utilizing old texts.

> and the Photos within are hard evidence/reference
>
> I'm sorry but I cannot take seriously any reserarcher who does
> not read


hugh? where did that comment come from? I provide data linked to the AE Rhind? And I apparently did this without reading? come on man.

>
> "I respect your input Warwick.... this data is made possbile
> with the help of the many great re-searchers right here @ GHMB.
> I had hoped to gain the orthodox's opinions through Ma'at...
> however, that has turned into another learning experience...
>
> I simply find it difficult to see orthodox's argument that no
> mathematical concepts would be embedded within their
> structures."
>
> try seeing what is actually there

I did...and show proof of it.

>
> the orthodox argument, if such can actually be said to exist,
> is that the encodation of mathematical concepts does not fit
> with our understanding of their beliefs.
>
> any theory that purports to Solve the Mystery of the Pyramids
> without cultural corroboration is not an Egyptological one
>
> But we are here to guide Titus in his seach for feedback
>
> I'd like to think that we can allow him to draw his own
> conclusions
>
> I cannot see how attempting to revive the Ortho Alterno
> Nonsense that he is asking that we got beyond is anything but
> disinformational and non constructive.
>
>
> Warwick
>


thanks for your brief time.... pretty much what i expected.
Time to go enjoy the day.... this is a waste of time.
cheers.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 325 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 253 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 200 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 197 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 208 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 214 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 204 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 283 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 234 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 228 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 208 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 204 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 241 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 219 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 227 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 283 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 205 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 195 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 148 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 206 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 195 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 222 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 231 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 238 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 241 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 220 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 236 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 207 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 211 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 237 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 217 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 261 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 226 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 224 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 199 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 252 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 211 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 218 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 235 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 255 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 208 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 251 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 202 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 209 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 200 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 230 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 176 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 205 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 230 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 198 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 208 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 252 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 253 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 198 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 204 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 189 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 228 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 236 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 219 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 226 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 237 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 196 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 195 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 219 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 224 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 277 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 249 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 196 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 212 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 204 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 254 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 214 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 287 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 225 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 223 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 196 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 267 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 226 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 234 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 245 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 219 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 197 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 202 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 239 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 190 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.