Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Titus, The 'debunking' web sites I have found, most of which have been quoted by Archae, et. al., having to do with archaeology and related fields, have basically all used ridicule, scorn, sarcasm, name-calling and character assassination to attack views which are commonly known as alternative. For a good example of this, follow the criticisms on the GHMB launched against the host, Graham Hancock, for his views on the evidence for a pre-Ice Age high civilization. Get the book, "Forbidden Archaeology's Impact", by Michael Cremo, if you want to read some high-brow criticism, and see how the 'big boys' debunk! In this book, Cremo shows how, in their own words, some of the top archaeologists try to debunk him: "Pure humbug and does not deserve to be taken seriously by anyone but a fool." "A must for anyone interested in keeping up with goofy, popular anthropology; it is a veritable cornucopia of dreck."
These are from Richard Leakey and Jonathan Marks, in order of quote. They do not attempt to give any kind of scientific answer to the questions posed by the work they denigrate, and such is the case for the debunkers as well on their websites. Richard Dawkins has written a whole book on the basis of debunking of alternative theory of human origins, picking on the weakest arguments(creationisms) in his opinion, and basically lumping it all together into the famous 'Bushistic' statement, "If you're not with us, you're with the enemy"(because there's only two sides, as he sees it). To Dawkins, alternative views are not worthy of consideration, even from reputable scientists.
I'll tell you something I believe, though: the establishment is running out of gas in this effort, and more and more scientists are not listening to this cacophany of name-calling and shrill invective, preferring to let the science lead them to discovery, rather than thinking they already know it all.
What is behind the debunking fury? Perhaps these establishment icons fear this:" To have modern human beings........appearing a great deal earlier, in fact at a time when even simple primates did not exist as possible ancestors, would be devastating not only to the accepted pattern. It would be devastating to the whole theory of evolution."- W.W. Howells, Physical Anthropologist. The quoted statements above are taken from "Forbidden Archaeology".
The simple fact is that the discipline won't live by its own maxim to modify its theories when new evidence becomes available. Instead, it seeks to undermine by coming out with statements like "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", thus setting up the establishment, which is challenged, as the arbiter of what is acceptable evidence. It's like what happens in 'whistle-blower' cases. The deck is stacked. Luckily, there's still free speech and the cyber-world we live in makes the acquisition and evaluation of information available to many more than previously has been the case. The very popularization of science has led many with differing perspectives on scientific problems to investigate for themselves, whether the alternative viewpoints have merit.
Thomas Jefferson called for "the diffusion of knowledge among the people. No other sure foundation can be devised for the preservation of freedom and happiness."
The National Academy of Sciences 1998 booklet comments on the teaching of science: "this process of public scrutiny is an essential part of science. It works to eliminate personal bias and subjectivity because others must be able to determine whether a proposed explanation is consistant with available evidence." It does not say the truth resides in the opinions of the most highly placed and visible academics in the field.
Finally, Titus, I hope you and many others can see that the explanation for who we are and how we got here hasn't been answered by anybody, definitively, yet, and we are doing ourselves and those who follow after us a disservice if we ignore or dismiss alternative views on the basis of thinking we've already "got it right". Cheers, Rick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 456 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 292 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 316 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 297 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 375 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 369 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 355 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 416 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 384 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 352 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 304 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 366 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 367 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 320 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 386 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 356 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 368 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 358 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 357 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 373 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 289 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 254 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 316 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 474 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 300 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 351 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 354 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 336 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 303 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 292 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 286 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 319 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 325 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 307 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 362 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 326 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 281 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 293 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 307 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 371 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 364 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 332 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 304 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 299 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 309 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 373 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 322 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 384 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 322 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 372 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 323 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 367 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 356 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.