Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R and M wrote:

> That is your interpretation of what I have written. As I
> previously stated "these" holy writings have been used by
> perverts from time immemorial.....nothing new here, just a new
> set of d...........s who happen to think that they can exploit
> the holy information for their own gain.

These perverts you speak of, Wendy, are men who are evil wolves in sheep's clothing.

It's nothing new that wicked people use holy information for their own gain.

Evil perverts use computers and the Internet too pursue their aims and ambitions. What's new in that?

What you're saying is what I'e been saying along!

> > ........not to mention that the forces for this "new world"
> > ambition, and the men behind it, were already in existence long
> > before the prophecies were made.....
>
> So you agree then that these individuals are the ones linked to
> the separation process in consciousness.....the lineage from
> the ancient lines who have always been the ones who have abused
> the spirit! Therefore "they" are part of the number sequences
> that form the prophetic outcomes as a calculation and therefore
> fit perfectly into the
> Armageddon outcome!
>
> Which "seed" do you assume survives, is the obvious statement
> to question that you need to answer! The story already reveals
> this!

The seed that prevails is the seed that's aligned with God's will.

The seed that fails and goes off into destruction and into a dismal violent end, is the seed that is following demonic forces.

> One of the best known Catholic prophets to predict that the
> Pope after John Paul II would be the last was Irishman
> Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair who is better known as simply St.
> Malachy. According to the prophecies of St. Malachy, who was
> born in 1094, the line of Pontiffs has come to an end.
>
> St. Malachy, canonized by by Pope Clement III on July 6, 1199,
> undertook to list in advance the proper succession of Roman
> pontiffs from Celestine II to "the end of the world". St.
> Malachy prophesied that there would be 112 Popes after
> Celestine II. John Paul II, who just died, is number 110. Pope
> number 111 would be the "False Prophet" mentioned in St. John's
> Revelation and who will deliver the Roman Catholic Church to
> Satan.
>
> Number 112 will NOT be a legitimate Pope. It will be the
> "Grand Anti-Pope" or the Anti-Christ who is also known as the
> "Abomination that Causes Desolation" mentioned in Daniel 9:27,
> 11:31, 12:11 and Matthew 24:15 and Mark 13:14. The Prophecies
> of St. Malachy conclude thusly: "In the final persecution of
> the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who
> will feed his flock among many tribulations; after which the
> seven hilled city (Rome) will be destroyed and the dreadful
> Judge will judge the people".
> [www.aztlan.net]

I agree with you, Wendy that the Roman Church is about to meet it's end, and Malachi, IMO, was right, but Christ gave a much more vivid description of how Mystery Babylon will fall.

Some of the songs of the late Bob Marley are also interesting in this regard!

> 7 of course relates to the Giza calculations/Genesis in light
> and hill/mound/mountain = the Law where God sits/strikes upon
> it.
>
> Lyrics to Tuesday's Dead :
> If I make a mark in time, I can't say the mark is mine.
> I'm only the underline of the word.
> Yes, I'm like him, just like you, I can't tell you what to do.
> Like everybody else I'm searching thru what I've heard.
>
> Whoa, Where do you go? When you don't want no one to know?
> Who told tomorrow Tuesday's dead
>
> Oh preacher won't you paint my dream, won't you show me where
> you've been
> Show me what I haven't seen to ease my mind.
> Cause I will learn to understand, if I have a helping hand.
> I wouldn't make another demand all my life.
>
> What's my sex, what's my name, all in all it's all the same.
> Everybody plays a different game, that is all.
> Now, man may live, man may die searching for the question why.
> But if he tries to rule the sky he must fall.
>
> Now every second on the nose, the humdrum of the city grows.
> Reaching out beyond the throes of our time.
> We must try to shake it down. Do our best to break the ground.
> Try to turn the world around one more time.
> Yeah, we must try to shake it down do our best to break the
> ground
> Try to turn the world around one more time
> [ Tuesday's Dead Lyrics on [www.lyricsmania.com] ]

It's an on going pursuit!

> Going into the ancient documents and the Matriarch we find:-
> Kali is one of the most misunderstood forms of God. The
> ordinary Western mind perceives Kali as hideous and absurd,
> forgetting that some of the symbols of Western faiths have the
> same effect on the Hindu. While Christians believe in a God
> that is all good and a devil that is all bad, Hindus believe in
> only one Universal Power which is beyond good and bad.

Wendy, you are making sweeping generalisations... the type of sweeping generalisations that I very much dislike.

Not all Christians believe that God and the Devil are two forces that have their own sources of power.

For your information, I believe that there is only one force and that is God because all power originates from God. The Devil has no energy source of his own, and the same goes for evil. Evil is simply the pervertion of God's power, and this explains why, in every final battle, good will triumph over evil. Evil simply has no power of its own. Evil agencies can only leech power like a vampire than needs blood to survive and function.

> Kali is the full picture of the Universal Power. She is Mother,
> the Benign, and Mother, the Terrible. She creates and nourishes
> and she kills and destroys. By Her magic we see good and bad,
> but in reality there is neither. The whole world and all we see
> is the play of Maya, the veiling power of the Divine Mother.
> God is neither good nor bad, nor both. God is beyond the pair
> of opposites which constitute this relative existence.

I agree that God is beyond duality. It is only parts of his creation that has rebelled and followed his or her own will in order to create evil.

God is pure love and goodness. It is only certain men and certain fallen divine beings that have decided, through the limited power of free will, to perform acts of evil.

> Kali ("the black one") is the Hindu mother goddess, symbol of
> dissolution and destruction. She destroys ignorance, maintains
> the world order, and blesses and frees those who strive for the
> knowledge of God. In the Vedas the name is associated with
> Agni, the god of fire, who had seven flickering tongues of
> flame, of which Kali was the black, horrible tongue. This
> meaning of the word has meanwhile been replaced by the goddess
> Kali, the grim consort of Shiva.
> Her appearance is fearsome: baleful eyes, a protruding tongue,
> and four arms. In her upper left hand she wields a bloody sword
> and in her lower left hand she holds the severed head of a
> demon
> [www.geocities.com]
>
> Her garland of course is SKULLS, because the origins to the
> time calculus relate to the bodies of time who die in the
> process of the next body in time = reincarnation. SKULL =
> BONES OF THE MOTHER, Goddess time calculations.

I disagree with you about this so-called "Mother" you speak of. She is corrupt and has followed a corrupt course of action.

> King James Bible 14.10
> And he sent, and beheaded John in the prison.
>
> Matthew 14:9 Although he was grieved, the king commanded it to
> be given because of his oaths, and because of his dinner
> guests.
> Matthew 14:11 And his head was brought on a platter and given
> to the girl, and she brought it to her mother.
> = LAST SUPPER IN TIME EQUATION.
>
> J being a letter that was added on from the letter I = IO
> (horns/arc).

I haven't a clue what you're going on about in your above comments.

> End of time is the fight between the first Holy spirit body and
> the Demon, as a clashing of the 2 sides in energy forming the O
> total head statement in time. Armageddon in Time clarifies
> that the balance is no longer met and hence in light
> destruction of the natural resources takes place......just as
> it has always done in the time parallels.
>
> Thus as the Roman Scribes knew, they could count up to the time
> when this destruction would take place, because it IS a time
> calculation. It displays that letters = the anagrams that form
> a statement of prophecy that just happen to align to letters =
> Number sequences.
>
> Numbers of course come from out of the Wilderness = 0, hence
> when the wave in time re-emerges in the Universal Quantum, as
> the Mayan's displayed. The Sacred Tree "roots into the centre
> of the Earth".
>
> Their star player VUCUB-CAQUIX bent the rules and cut off
> HUN-HUNAHPU's head. The referee didn't like to say anything or
> even admit to being there. And who can blame him? (American
> pie = the players tried to take the field, the marching band
> refused to yield.....do you recall what was revealed the DAY
> THE MUSIC DIED!)
>
> VUCUB-CAQUIX hung the head on a calabash tree. One day an
> Underworld lass called XQUIC fancied a calabash and picked what
> was left of HUN-HUNAHPU by mistake.
> [www.godchecker.com]
>
> SEE ART and how symbolism is represented, why "alien" can be
> identified as universal symbols to the coming event horizon
> [www.edensart.com]
>
> WAR OF THE WORLDS - SPIDER WEAVER ANCIENT STORIES -
> MAGNETOSPHERE MONSTER = death ray
> [www.webwombat.com.au]
>
> SEE MERCURY
> [www.sciencedaily.com]
>
> As one of the five "moving stars" or "planets", Mercury's name
> is the origin of "Wednesday." In French, this is 'mercredi',
> coming from the Latin 'Mercurii dies', or Mercury's day
> [www.hermograph.com]
>
> 7 = the DAY OF THE HOLY SABBATH.
>
> BAS BATH = the "watering" and baptism originally the HOLY FIRE!
>
> See the meanings for BASe and you have the many symbols written
> about in the Holy storylines
> [ardictionary.com]
> So besides these symbols and reference to low moral character
> (devil/satan) we also find that it relates to "prisoner", also
> the fallen angel imprisoned within the middle of the
> Earth.......where the Tree is Rooted = Tree of Life.
>
> In the Biblical Text we find 2 references to Jesus as a
> prisoner at the BAR, and 1 is released. This is where we find
> another reference to the conflict of energy between 2 forces
> within and held in a stone cavity or dungeon as prisons were.
> A rustic play; -- called also prisoner's base, prison base, or
> bars
> [thinkexist.com]
>
> It is also a spiritual reference "to debase", which is what has
> happened to these spiritual teachings on Earth, hence those who
> have debased them and the spirit of the Christ get what is
> going to be returned. This is KARMA as K = the 1,000 Hebrew
> symbol of Aleph as a previous ancient sanction + ARM = the
> many arms of GOD.
>
> The
> blades[www.barbariangroup.com]
>
>
> "Good bye Yellow Brick Road"....when are you going to come
> down, when are you going to land.....I'm not a present = EL +
> TON JOHN. You can't nab me in your PENTHOUSE = the White
> House. SEE UNIVERSAL CODEX Mother Goddess predictions for
> America!
>
> SPIRIT of the Heavens = Alpha time predictions from the
> beginning to the end.

You seem to have gone off into one of your convoluted ramblings that amounts to jibberish.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 281 shamanaut 30-May-09 16:38
The work of Acharya S has been debunked 180 Milo 30-May-09 17:13
Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 130 shamanaut 30-May-09 23:14
Obviously Achyara supporters are going to Gawf 159 Milo 31-May-09 00:16
I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 168 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:15
Re: I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 137 Milo 31-May-09 16:24
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 175 David L 02-Jun-09 04:31
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 167 Milo 02-Jun-09 09:41
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 135 David L 03-Jun-09 04:48
Everyone on this forum has different beliefs to the next poster anyway 159 Milo 03-Jun-09 09:50
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 153 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:02
Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 193 Milo 31-May-09 01:10
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 120 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:02
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 145 Milo 31-May-09 02:23
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 141 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:06
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 145 Milo 31-May-09 03:18
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 143 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:33
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 121 Milo 31-May-09 03:47
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 149 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:44
Plagiarism 163 Milo 31-May-09 11:12
Re: Plagiarism 139 David Campbell 31-May-09 17:14
Re: Plagiarism 157 Milo 31-May-09 17:31
Re: Plagiarism 175 Lee McGiffen 03-Jun-09 14:08
Re: Plagiarism 121 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:48
Re: Plagiarism 166 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:29
Re: Plagiarism 164 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:34
Demons 149 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:40
Re: Demons 122 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:50
Re: Demons 147 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:03
Re: Plagiarism 138 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:07
Re: Plagiarism 125 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 05:23
Re: Plagiarism 140 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:14
Re: Plagiarism 159 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 12:30
Re: Plagiarism 142 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:35
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 139 papalou 03-Jun-09 23:03
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 154 Milo 03-Jun-09 23:09
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 158 papalou 04-Jun-09 18:01
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 136 Milo 04-Jun-09 18:57
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 124 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 19:06
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 137 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:40
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 118 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:41
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 153 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 08:25
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 159 Milo 08-Jun-09 12:42
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 107 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 13:49
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 182 Milo 08-Jun-09 13:53
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 152 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 14:44
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 152 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:52
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 147 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 15:23
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 146 Milo 08-Jun-09 15:32
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 138 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:14
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 143 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:21
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 108 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:31
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 132 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:34
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 137 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:13
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 126 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 153 David Campbell 31-May-09 00:42
The Underlying Agenda 123 Milo 31-May-09 01:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 160 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:18
Re: The Underlying Agenda 158 Milo 31-May-09 01:27
O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 125 Milo 31-May-09 01:48
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 154 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:41
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 114 Milo 31-May-09 02:44
Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 141 Milo 31-May-09 02:52
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 117 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:58
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 175 Milo 31-May-09 04:11
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 159 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:22
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 137 Milo 31-May-09 04:31
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 160 Milo 31-May-09 04:34
Re: The Underlying Agenda 151 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:28
Re: The Underlying Agenda 155 Milo 31-May-09 02:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 147 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 157 Milo 31-May-09 03:20
Re: The Underlying Agenda 147 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:11
Re: The Underlying Agenda 180 Milo 31-May-09 04:29
Re: The Underlying Agenda 138 The Kwuda 01-Jun-09 17:43
Re: The Underlying Agenda 121 Milo 01-Jun-09 19:14
Re: The Underlying Agenda 144 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 10:55
Re: The Underlying Agenda 132 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:09
Re: The Underlying Agenda 126 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 164 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The Underlying Agenda 105 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:51
Re: The Underlying Agenda 163 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:42
Re: The Underlying Agenda 145 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:16
Re: The Underlying Agenda 143 Milo 02-Jun-09 22:04
Re: The Underlying Agenda 170 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:47
source of my quote 130 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:48
Re: source of my quote 165 Milo 31-May-09 17:27
Re: source of my quote 138 Milo 31-May-09 17:40
Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 152 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 155 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 147 R and M 02-Jun-09 09:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 143 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:04
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 126 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 173 R and M 03-Jun-09 04:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 135 The Kwuda 04-Jun-09 06:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 153 Milo 04-Jun-09 10:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 128 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 161 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:34
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 114 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 171 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 139 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:40
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 131 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 109 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:46
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 153 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 152 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 119 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 149 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 151 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:41
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 126 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 118 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 126 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 120 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:48
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 129 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 145 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 143 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 140 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 143 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 110 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 118 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:55
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 158 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:56
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 145 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:58
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 149 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 148 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:01
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 167 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:03
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 121 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:06
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 135 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:09
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 114 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:13
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 151 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 157 R and M 04-Jun-09 10:49
The two seeds of Genesis 3 126 Milo 04-Jun-09 11:39
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 141 R and M 05-Jun-09 05:47
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 136 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:21
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 157 R and M 05-Jun-09 13:29
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 140 ariston 05-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 110 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:14
correction... 125 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:16
Re: correction... 129 ariston 05-Jun-09 14:39
Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 159 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:01
correction... 143 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:45
Re: correction... 113 ariston 05-Jun-09 18:16
Re: correction... 156 Milo 05-Jun-09 22:30
Re: correction... 152 ariston 06-Jun-09 02:19
Re: correction... 142 Milo 06-Jun-09 03:00
Re: correction... 113 ariston 06-Jun-09 04:12
Re: correction... 142 Milo 06-Jun-09 04:23
Re: correction... 146 Eddie Larry 07-Jun-09 15:23
Re: correction... 145 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:42
Re: correction... 160 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 02:50
Re: correction... 146 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:19
Re: correction... 105 Eddie Larry 10-Jun-09 00:50
Re: correction... 147 Milo 10-Jun-09 05:02
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 151 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:53
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 131 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:15
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 144 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:45
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 147 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:24
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 119 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:48
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 129 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:18
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 158 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:20
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 108 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:44
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 157 R and M 06-Jun-09 07:54
ABC 163 Milo 06-Jun-09 12:36
Re: the end 161 R and M 07-Jun-09 10:12
Re: the end 143 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:20
Re: the end 124 R and M 08-Jun-09 07:15
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 144 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:00
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 147 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 142 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 134 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 128 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 136 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 116 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 141 shamanaut 03-Jun-09 17:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 119 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 124 Raja 04-Jun-09 07:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 203 Aine 04-Jun-09 15:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 152 Milo 04-Jun-09 19:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 202 Aine 04-Jun-09 19:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 154 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 118 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 21:20
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 104 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:26
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 159 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 06:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 173 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:22
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 157 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 20:16
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 122 Raja 05-Jun-09 21:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 165 carolb 04-Jun-09 20:19
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 150 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 161 carolb 04-Jun-09 21:23
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 110 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 178 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 139 Milo 04-Jun-09 22:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 147 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 110 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 114 carolb 04-Jun-09 23:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 151 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:33
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 139 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:35
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 157 Tom Hebert 02-Jun-09 18:11
jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 141 Eddie Larry 03-Jun-09 04:44
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 151 Susan Doris 03-Jun-09 08:40
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 144 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 01:13
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 96 Tom Hebert 03-Jun-09 10:31
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 129 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:15
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 130 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:16
Jesus was not a myth 144 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:18
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 146 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 112 Diomede 04-Jun-09 00:11
For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 130 David L 04-Jun-09 02:34
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 134 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:38
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 142 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:10
Jesus 140 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:14
Diabolical Mimicry 148 Deep1 04-Jun-09 21:11
Re: Diabolical Mimicry 142 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:15
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 132 Enigcom 05-Jun-09 17:43
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 111 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 133 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 117 deeside 06-Jun-09 19:42
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 153 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:07
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 158 deeside 06-Jun-09 20:47
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 153 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:51
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 160 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:08
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 119 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 156 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 137 deeside 07-Jun-09 09:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 149 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 160 childinthesun 07-Jun-09 17:02
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 146 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 154 ariston 07-Jun-09 17:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 142 Milo 07-Jun-09 18:05
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 126 deeside 08-Jun-09 14:46
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 138 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:57
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 164 deeside 08-Jun-09 21:32
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 154 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:21
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 145 ariston 06-Jun-09 20:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 114 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 167 deeside 07-Jun-09 21:24
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 116 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 131 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 00:23
jesus was there... 143 shazaman 09-Jun-09 09:54
Re: jesus was there... 139 papalou 11-Jun-09 02:08
Re: jesus was there... 132 Milo 11-Jun-09 08:46
Re: jesus was there... 117 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 09:38
Re: jesus was there... 139 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:14
Re: jesus was there... 133 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:37
Re: jesus was there... 163 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 11:32
Re: jesus was there... 167 Milo 11-Jun-09 13:17
Re: jesus was there... 137 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 19:56
Re: jesus was there... 135 Milo 11-Jun-09 21:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 138 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 15:36


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.