Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Hi All,

Where did all of the following come from? Allowing the Great Pyramid to establish the its own parameters gives clues as to the possible intentions of the ancient builders. The Grand Gallery of the Great Pyramid provides some interesting conceptual mathematical discourse in that it offers a simple method to confirm the Great Pyramid’s intended dimensions. Starting with the 54 notches, for which no one has offered a satisfactory explanation, carved into the ramps near the floor of the Grand Gallery and multiply them by the 14 (7 each side) corbels of stone gives the number of 756, which is equal’s the base length of the Great Pyramid base in feet.
With these 54 notches and 54 notches carved into the walls makes a total of 108 notches, when multiplied by the total number of corbels 28 (4 walls 7 corbels) equal to 3024 a number equal to the perimeter of the Great Pyramid in feet.

The Grand Gallery contains two grooves, one in the east wall and one in the west wall for which no one has offered a satisfactory explanation. The groves are 7 inches high, 1 inch deep, and 5 inches up on the 3rd overlapping corbel and runs the entire length of the gallery which conceptually divides the corbels into two sections of three-sevenths and four sevenths.

Multiplying the number of ceiling stones (40) by the number of notches (54) in the ramps, corbels (28) and the four sevenths of the upper corbels 4/7 gives a number figure 34560…(40 * 54 *28 * 4/7= 34,560) Also using the lower corbels of 3/7 produces (40 * 54 * 28 * 3/7 = 25,920), does anyone not know that this number signifies the great year? Adding the wall notches to the ramp notches produces (40 * 108 * 28 * 4/7 = 69,120) the same using the lower corbels 3/7 yields 40 * 108 * 28 * 3/7 = 51,840

You would think this impossible, the AE could not possibly have placed this information here in this form, it is only coincidence. Is it or isn't it? Further we find using only the ramp notches (54) time the corbels (28) times 4/7 = 864, the same for the bottom 3/7 = 648, all of the notches (108) times the corbels (28) and 4/7 = 1728 or 12^3, the same for the bottom 3/7 = 1296 or 9*12^2. The same sequence of numbers produced by the various levels of the Sun Pyramid at Teotihuacan.

There are many different combination's of the decorative elements of the Grand Gallery that form mathematical equations with out touching a measuring device. Were these placed in the Grand Gallery to supply hints of the builder’s intended mathematical discourse? This conceptual framework seems to be continuous throughout the Great Pyramid and can be extended to the Kings Chamber where is found, similar equations concealed within the course blocks of the Kings Chamber that establishes the angle of the GP, provides a unit of measure and gives a value for &#960; in the form of 22/7.

The ceiling of the Kings Chamber using conceptual mathematics finds the ceiling is comprised of nine stones, seven full stones with two partial stones on the north and south ends respectively. Taking this to mean 7 full stone and 2 partial stones 7.2 or 72, finding 7.2 is the sqrt of 51.84 (14/11 seked) and 72 is the sqrt of 5184. The Kings Chamber’s wall’s top course contains 7 blocks total, just below the top course is a course that contains 24 blocks. Dividing the second course by the top course gives the value for of 24/ 7 which is a double 12/7 Pyramid base equals (21^2) 441 * 12/7 cubits produces the number 756 found in the Grand Gallery’s notches and corbels. The fourth course down is comprised of 22 blocks divided by the top course gives 22/7 or 3 1/7.

There are too many coincidences to accept as not being intentional! The floor of the Kings Chamber continues this same pattern of so called coincidences. But that is for another time. This may not prove the Ancient Egyptians had any knowledge of the British Foot but if found to be viable demonstrates the true builders of the Pyramids were aware of and used the British foot and inch and were surely capable of calculating and dividing a circle into degrees.

Regards,

Jacob

"True knowledge stands on its own merit, true knowledge needs no cheerleaders, only receptors. There is no amount of attitude that will strengthen true knowledge".~Author unknown!

Subject Views Written By Posted
Conceptual Mathematics 279 Sirfiroth 09-Oct-08 16:55
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 182 Scott Creighton 09-Oct-08 17:17
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 182 Sirfiroth 09-Oct-08 18:55
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 200 geoffss 09-Oct-08 20:22
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 211 Sirfiroth 09-Oct-08 23:12
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 193 magisterchessmutt 10-Oct-08 00:18
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 180 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 01:52
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 201 magisterchessmutt 11-Oct-08 01:01
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 181 Sirfiroth 11-Oct-08 20:04
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 185 michael seabrook 09-Oct-08 22:19
Extremely Contrived Mathematics 186 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 02:06
Re: Extremely Contrived Mathematics 137 magisterchessmutt 10-Oct-08 02:40
Re: Extremely Contrived Mathematics 176 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 03:05
Re: Extremely Contrived Mathematics 179 magisterchessmutt 10-Oct-08 03:40
Re: Not Extremely Contrived Mathematics 172 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 03:32
Re: Not Extremely Contrived Mathematics 191 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 03:35
Re: Not Extremely Contrived Mathematics 194 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 04:14
Re: Not Extremely Contrived Mathematics 179 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 04:36
Re: Not Extremely Contrived Mathematics 215 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 04:40
Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 156 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 06:00
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 185 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 06:15
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 174 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 06:36
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 171 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 09:05
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 159 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 14:32
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 187 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 16:06
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 194 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 16:22
Re: Very Extremely Contrived Mathematics 197 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 16:31
Re: Extremely Contrived Mathematics 170 Scott Creighton 10-Oct-08 10:04
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 216 P Mac 10-Oct-08 13:13
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 184 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 15:37
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 198 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 16:05
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 199 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 16:23
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 201 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 16:30
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 197 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 16:44
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 196 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 17:13
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 203 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 18:12
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 187 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 18:22
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 175 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 18:37
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 146 legionromanes 10-Oct-08 18:41
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 195 Sirfiroth 10-Oct-08 21:58
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 198 ariston 11-Oct-08 21:28
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 225 Sirfiroth 12-Oct-08 07:15
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 192 ariston 12-Oct-08 21:13
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 245 magisterchessmutt 12-Oct-08 21:31
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 214 ariston 13-Oct-08 00:14
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 173 magisterchessmutt 13-Oct-08 02:03
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 195 magisterchessmutt 13-Oct-08 02:26
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 246 ariston 13-Oct-08 02:42
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 187 magisterchessmutt 13-Oct-08 05:03
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 186 Modeh 13-Oct-08 07:20
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 197 magisterchessmutt 13-Oct-08 11:32
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 209 Modeh 13-Oct-08 12:52
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 185 Modeh 13-Oct-08 13:08
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 160 Joyeuse 13-Oct-08 23:36
Trumpet synchro 194 Joyeuse 13-Oct-08 23:34
Re: Trumpet synchro 231 ariston 14-Oct-08 00:11
Re: Trumpet synchro 186 ariston 14-Oct-08 00:30
Re: Trumpet synchro 189 ariston 14-Oct-08 00:51
Re: Trumpet synchro 197 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 01:46
Re: Trumpet synchro 181 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 01:44
Re: Trumpet synchro 227 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 01:39
Re: Trumpet synchro 173 ariston 14-Oct-08 02:40
Re: Trumpet synchro 238 Modeh 14-Oct-08 02:24
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 175 ariston 13-Oct-08 20:19
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 184 Modeh 14-Oct-08 01:56
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 179 ariston 14-Oct-08 02:48
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 205 Modeh 14-Oct-08 03:27
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 201 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 04:25
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 192 Modeh 14-Oct-08 04:50
2009 the year of the Bull 179 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 05:10
Here is another version with your citation 223 Joyeuse 14-Oct-08 05:23
Re: Here is another version with your citation 216 Modeh 14-Oct-08 05:58
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 175 ariston 13-Oct-08 01:07
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 175 Sirfiroth 13-Oct-08 18:24
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 222 ariston 13-Oct-08 20:15
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 197 Sirfiroth 14-Oct-08 01:04
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 136 ariston 14-Oct-08 03:54
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 224 Glanymor1948 14-Oct-08 18:39
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 196 ariston 13-Oct-08 23:20
Re: Conceptual Mathematics 226 Modeh 14-Oct-08 02:06

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.