Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Academia works hard and searches and finds evidence for THEIR accepted theories, but withhold the support for alternate theories that require the same amount of hard work and search.

Evidence can only be found if you can search for it. Convetional theories have the advantage of decades, possibly hundreds of years evidence to back it up. Yet on the same note, alternate theories lack the evidence because not so many people research in it (pronounce not enough support nor guts to support such research). Yet people proclaim these theories as folly because they have no evidence!!

Why can't it be allowed for people that have the imagination and courage to study these matters be left alone and given the same privileges as others.

It would be very interesting if a company would be willing to publish articles concerning alternate theories in a scientific and 'really' objective way of seein if the arguments are objective and valid. (yes, Sri Kowtha, we are humans and are ultimately subjective in nature, but one could try!!), on par with those renown journals like nature etc.

Mark Chan

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The folly of Academia 387 MArk Chan 04-Dec-00 14:32
RE: The folly of Academia 216 peterk 04-Dec-00 16:13
RE: The folly of Academia 197 MArk Chan 04-Dec-00 16:46
RE: The folly of Academia 172 Brian A 04-Dec-00 17:20
RE: The folly of Academia 209 MArk Chan 04-Dec-00 18:05
RE: The folly of Academia 214 Sri Kowtha 04-Dec-00 17:37
RE: The folly of Academia 212 MArk Chan 04-Dec-00 17:55
RE: The folly of Academia 186 MArk Chan 04-Dec-00 17:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.