How can I trust anything you have to say if you fear that what you say is going to get published?
You have no rational for posting because anyone here could find out who you are and send on your ridiculous arguments.
Or is it because you have a book in the works and GH will beat you to the punch.
Actually Graham would be perfectly within his rights to publish anything say on his forum or any forum in fact if he gave credit to the people posting.
Legally he has that right. It is not plagarizing and it is a public forum. It is as if you made these arguments on the street. These arguments are available for the public to read and if GH copy rights them what would you do?
So again your arguments make no sense. Why not give him the verbal permission that he has without your permission.
|Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||415||Graham Hancock||03-Dec-00 13:15|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||204||Garrett Fagan||03-Dec-00 15:48|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||156||Christophe L.||03-Dec-00 20:11|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||201||Haytham||03-Dec-00 21:00|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||184||Edwin||03-Dec-00 21:32|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||197||Christophe L.||04-Dec-00 12:30|
|Doesn't this Fagan guy got tenure to protect???||217||William John Meegan||04-Dec-00 21:04|
|RE: Hancock Fagan Objectivity Speculation||204||R. Avry Wilson||04-Dec-00 14:18|