Hi Scott ...

Yes very sorry to nitpick but when one puts forward a theory as "far out" as yourself and Gary one has to be extremely accurate and more importantly consistent.

There are many out there who subscribe to the possibility of a shift of The Earth but a 17 degree shift for Giza is quite large indeed and a shift in tilt of 26.5 degrees is of such a magnitude as to beg a susbstantial amount of proof.

This is going to be very hard to get accepted since Earth shifts and such have been argued since the days of Hapgood and I am afraid have never received a warm welcome.

We are going to need more than simply designs that work in old megalithic monuments for I am afraid even if the math is flawless there is a hard core of prominent orthodox stagnating scientific minds who are going to demand the smoking gun. Even if we have the body, the bullit, the motive and the scene of the crime they still want the gun even though it may lay at the bottom of The Mariana Trench.

The Double Whammy of both your's and Gary's theories is that people have to first accept the shift of the axis and then after accepting that it was possible or did indeed happen that it was then encoded in the ancient megalithic monuments (and passed on to the artisans who then encoded it into the paintings of Renaissance art).

A hard thing to do for people who think "The Jerry Springer Show" is real and unscripted and that professional wrestling is on the up and up.

Cheers
Don Barone