Hi Gary,

All I can say about a responce or non-responce to you conceptual model of the Earth/GP arrangement at this moment is, 'relax', it will be coming around soon enough I think. As I mentioned in another post thread, I just came across your original research paper on my old computer posted around 2003 on the internet with the intent of discussing it with you at some point in the future, and then got caught up in other matters, and now look, here we are, via those other matters, looking at it once again, LOL! Now if I can just remember what it was I was going to discuss with you at that time, it would be helpful no doubt. Offhand, just like everything else being discussed here, it probably could use just a bit of tweaking to make it from theory to a fact. Anytime one encounters a static image of a dynamic process such as celestial motions etc., one has to look at it within the range of its parameters of values degrees etc. to see it's full potential. That of course takes time, just to gather the necessary information and then do the application of it to the static model. I'm hoping there are short-cuts around which will provide that information. Like you said about Jacob Boaz, I too agree he knows a few things to comment on about this matter, as I have discussed a few things with him as well so far. Don't know where he got off to for the moment though. Probably just like myself, got caught up in other matters.

So once again, hang in there and Do Carry On!

Best,

Stephen