Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
You know, your comment about finding the "common ancestor", as well as Susan's reference to Richard Dawkins puts me in mind of something I learned from a couple of botanists.

I have already mentioned that I am not a scientist, unless you consider someone with an MBA who sort of understands the "dismal science" of economics to be a scientist LOL! But I have always enjoyed science, and my wife and I are always taking a science course or two at the local junior college; I guess we know just enough to be dangerous.

We also work as volunteers at a local arboretum in Arizona, and went to a couple of colloquia on plant taxonomy with some botanists specializing in desert plants.

It seems that, although they still teach Linnaeus' binomial classification, as well as the Kingdom-Phylum-Class-Order-Family-Genus-Species thingy, it's no longer considered a big deal.

Instead, they use molelecular systematics (mitochondrial DNA comparisons) to determine at what point in time two species have diverged, which has led to a de facto investigation of plants as being either the same species (i.e., they can interbreed and produce viable ofspring) or not; and if not, how far back did they diverge.

This is exactly the approach Dawkins makes in his "Ancestor's Tale". Although I still feel an emotional atachment to Linnaeus' classification, I suppose the present way makes more sense, although I'm also guessing that Biblical literalists would have a hard time with it, since it makes several assumptions which are at the same time quite basic and quite anti-Bible.



"Given any kind of real choice as children, we'd all be Christians because they have hot dogs with mustard and pickle-relish."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The missing link is still missing 137 Citizen Attorney 29-Nov-06 13:29
I don't believe thre's a missing link per se. 336 Duncan Kunz 29-Nov-06 16:49
Re: I don't believe thre's a missing link per se. 169 Susan Doris 29-Nov-06 20:00
Reed Richards as the Missing Link? 67 Me 30-Nov-06 00:59
Brother Dawkins 82 Duncan Kunz 30-Nov-06 16:52
Re: Brother Dawkins 91 Susan Doris 30-Nov-06 19:20
Well-said, Duncan. 83 AndyBlackard 30-Nov-06 22:12
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 102 Duncan Kunz 01-Dec-06 16:04
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 75 AndyBlackard 01-Dec-06 16:13
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 103 Citizen Attorney 02-Dec-06 03:39
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 77 Me 02-Dec-06 23:34
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 94 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 02:52
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 119 Susan Doris 03-Dec-06 08:19
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 83 Citizen Attorney 03-Dec-06 03:44
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 83 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 04:49
Brain Size and diet? 75 W_C_Sally 03-Dec-06 08:33
Re: Brain Size and diet? 78 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 12:37
Re: Brain Size and diet? 75 Me 03-Dec-06 23:52
Best ratio is 50 - 50, usually not the norm, but in olden days, ?? 96 W_C_Sally 13-Dec-06 06:34
Re: The missing link is still missing 51 Raja 29-Nov-06 17:55
Re: The missing link is still missing 93 Raja 29-Nov-06 18:45
Re: The missing link is still missing 79 Duncan Kunz 30-Nov-06 17:08
Re: The missing link is still missing 51 Raja 30-Nov-06 21:11
Re: The missing link is still missing, oh no, there he is! 103 Me 01-Dec-06 00:09
Re: The missing link is still missing, oh no, there he is! 74 Raja 02-Dec-06 09:26


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.