Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I think the study of a 'missing link' is a straw-man. If you accept the postulates of macro-evolution, you can figure that there are a whole bunch of little steps as an organism evolves to better suit its environment. At what point, for example did Australopithecus afarensus become Homo habilis? Well, we see a whole bunch of the former at a particular time, and then a whole bunch of the latter at a somewhat later time, but I don't infer from that that there was this sudden mutation from one to another.

More likely (in my never-humble opinion), the changes slowly accumulate until, at time point "X", we see some Homo habilis fossils.

Remember, there never were a large prehistoric population of hominids, given the sustenance-space and nutrition requirments for such omnivores before the development of agriculture. And of that small number, an even smaller number of bodies were "fortunate" enough to be in an environnment where it was possible for their remains to be preserved.

We can say that there have been a lot of links between H. sapiens and the first proto-simian, between H. sapiens and the first proto-pongids, and between H. sapiens and the first proto-hominid.

I don't think we'll ever find the missing link, because I see the entire evolution thing as a continuum rather than a step-wise set of species and geni.



"Given any kind of real choice as children, we'd all be Christians because they have hot dogs with mustard and pickle-relish."

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The missing link is still missing 124 Citizen Attorney 29-Nov-06 13:29
I don't believe thre's a missing link per se. 326 Duncan Kunz 29-Nov-06 16:49
Re: I don't believe thre's a missing link per se. 159 Susan Doris 29-Nov-06 20:00
Reed Richards as the Missing Link? 61 Me 30-Nov-06 00:59
Brother Dawkins 75 Duncan Kunz 30-Nov-06 16:52
Re: Brother Dawkins 83 Susan Doris 30-Nov-06 19:20
Well-said, Duncan. 78 AndyBlackard 30-Nov-06 22:12
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 91 Duncan Kunz 01-Dec-06 16:04
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 68 AndyBlackard 01-Dec-06 16:13
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 97 Citizen Attorney 02-Dec-06 03:39
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 70 Me 02-Dec-06 23:34
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 89 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 02:52
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 104 Susan Doris 03-Dec-06 08:19
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 77 Citizen Attorney 03-Dec-06 03:44
Re: Well-said, Duncan. 77 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 04:49
Brain Size and diet? 69 W_C_Sally 03-Dec-06 08:33
Re: Brain Size and diet? 74 AndyBlackard 03-Dec-06 12:37
Re: Brain Size and diet? 70 Me 03-Dec-06 23:52
Best ratio is 50 - 50, usually not the norm, but in olden days, ?? 91 W_C_Sally 13-Dec-06 06:34
Re: The missing link is still missing 46 Raja 29-Nov-06 17:55
Re: The missing link is still missing 86 Raja 29-Nov-06 18:45
Re: The missing link is still missing 72 Duncan Kunz 30-Nov-06 17:08
Re: The missing link is still missing 46 Raja 30-Nov-06 21:11
Re: The missing link is still missing, oh no, there he is! 96 Me 01-Dec-06 00:09
Re: The missing link is still missing, oh no, there he is! 68 Raja 02-Dec-06 09:26


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.