You cut/pasted this:
>>You lack a professional attitude, sir, and this in turn destroys your purpose. Ask yourself:
"Does my two-step agenda (noted above) refute Graham's, Robert's, etc. theories?"<<
Answered with this:
"How many times do I need to repeat this. IT IS NOT THE PURPOSE OF THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY TO DISPROVE GH & RB. SURELY IT IS UP TO GH & RB TO PROVE THEIR IDEAS AND THEORIES ARE SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE. CURRENTLY THEY ARE NOT."
It's a yes/no question. You still haven't answered it. Please do.
Let me ask you another: what happens to a theory when it is proven? I'll answer FOR you: It becomes a fact.
Please site an Egyptological/Archaeological fact, or site a theory, then prove it.
By the way, I take acception to your purpose, not your character. I far as I can summize, your purpose defines your character. By all means tell me/show me something different, and maybe I can judge you in a new light. Until then, your character remains unproven.
R Avry Wilson
|Bravo Robert!!!||369||Trisha Webber||30-Nov-00 21:51|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||199||Dr E||01-Dec-00 12:00|
|And the rest of you?||166||Bryan||01-Dec-00 12:31|
|RE: And the rest of you?||197||Dr E||01-Dec-00 12:39|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||146||R. Avry Wilson||01-Dec-00 13:05|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||189||Dr E||01-Dec-00 13:35|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||186||MArk Chan||04-Dec-00 13:49|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||147||R. Avry Wilson||01-Dec-00 14:17|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||176||Dr E||01-Dec-00 16:24|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||183||Irritated !!||01-Dec-00 17:09|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||266||Dr E||01-Dec-00 17:52|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||187||laura||01-Dec-00 18:19|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||213||Margaret||01-Dec-00 23:54|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||132||MArk Chan||04-Dec-00 14:19|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||165||R. Avry Wilson||02-Dec-00 11:05|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||158||Dr E||04-Dec-00 10:47|
|RE: Bravo Robert!!!||191||MArk Chan||04-Dec-00 13:39|