Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Citizen Attorney wrote:

>
> The evidence is in terms of a layer of ash throughout the
> southern pacific basin that suggests some large volcanic
> activity that could have sunken this huge continent.
>

Let's see :)

Quote

In 1965, cruising off the west coast of Mexico, Joe Worzel detected a reflection with ship's echo sounder from a curious sediment layer. He tracked this layer over several days — over some three hundred miles off the coast and another fifteen hundred miles down the western South American coast. When the sediment boundary appeared to rise close enough to the surface, Worzel took a core. (The sediments were green and had a hydrogen sulfide smell. Worzel jokingly sent a message to Ewing that he had found remnants of lunar green cheese in the Pacific, later reporting that Ewing did not find this humorous). But more important than the green layer, the core also contained a relatively thick layer of what he called white ash. Back at Lamont, Ericson identified the material as ash from a volcanic eruption — one that must have been almost unimaginably enormous to cover the seafloor so extensively.

[www.ldeo.columbia.edu]

Not exactly the same as "throughout the southern pacific basin" ;)

The ash layer does extend for about 2,500km x 500 km in the eastern Pacific - and possibly across the Gulf of Mexico and into the Atlantic. It's suggestive of a massive andesitic volcanic eruption, probably within the last 100,000 years. But nothing on the scale necessary to destroy an massive continent.

See: Significance of the Worzell Deep Sea Ash Ewing etal 1959

I'm not sure what further research has been carried out, but we do know an awful lot more about tectonic processes than we did in '59.



Andy
Extraordinary claims require at least some evidence.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Evidence of Mu 451 Citizen Attorney 13-Aug-06 02:46
Re: The Evidence of Mu 256 Citizen Attorney 13-Aug-06 02:52
Gas belts 284 Citizen Attorney 13-Aug-06 03:01
Re: Gas belts 221 Essan 01-Sep-06 11:30
Re: Gas belts 239 Me 24-Apr-08 00:52
Re: Gas belts 244 Essan 25-Apr-08 12:32
Re: Gas belts 221 Raja 24-Apr-08 06:30
Re: Gas belts 222 michael seabrook 25-Apr-08 21:09
Re: Gas belts 286 Susan Doris 24-Apr-08 14:32
Re: Gas belts 233 Citizen Attorney 25-Apr-08 02:34
Re: Gas belts 287 Susan Doris 25-Apr-08 07:04
Re: The Evidence of Mu 315 michael seabrook 13-Aug-06 09:46
Re: Subduction maps ... very interesting ... 230 W_C_Sally 31-Aug-06 19:47
Re: Subduction maps ... very interesting ... 255 Citizen Attorney 01-Sep-06 22:35
Re: The Evidence of Mu 274 michael seabrook 23-Apr-08 23:04
Re: The Evidence of Mu 237 Citizen Attorney 24-Apr-08 05:20
Re: The Evidence of Mu 185 Raja 24-Apr-08 06:42
Re: The Evidence of Mu 244 michael seabrook 25-Apr-08 20:31
Re: The Evidence of Mu 261 michael seabrook 25-Apr-08 20:47
Re: The Evidence of Mu 215 Raja 26-Apr-08 17:13
Re: The Evidence of Mu 207 legionromanes 26-Apr-08 21:32
Re: The Evidence of Mu 236 Citizen Attorney 27-Apr-08 06:45
Re: The Evidence of Mu 283 Susan Doris 27-Apr-08 07:03
Re: The Evidence of Mu 255 Raja 27-Apr-08 16:59
Re: The Evidence of Mu 249 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 17:15
Re: The Evidence of Mu 210 Raja 27-Apr-08 18:35
Re: The Evidence of Mu 234 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 19:19
blanket dismissals 262 drrayeye 27-Apr-08 20:01
Re: blanket dismissals 251 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 20:11
Re: blanket dismissals 285 drrayeye 27-Apr-08 20:25
Re: blanket dismissals 231 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 20:39
Same fallacy 277 drrayeye 27-Apr-08 22:42
Re: Same fallacy 243 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 23:48
You're clearly not a scientist 260 drrayeye 28-Apr-08 01:11
Re: You're clearly not a scientist 243 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 01:29
It's all about what one can prove 274 drrayeye 28-Apr-08 02:18
Re: It's all about what one can prove 222 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 02:57
Sorry 296 drrayeye 28-Apr-08 07:05
Re: You're clearly not a scientist 279 Susan Doris 28-Apr-08 07:27
Re: You're clearly not a scientist 261 drrayeye 28-Apr-08 09:49
Re: You're clearly not a scientist 270 Susan Doris 28-Apr-08 11:37
Mode Note 238 JonnyMcA 28-Apr-08 09:50
Re: Mode Note 482 drrayeye 28-Apr-08 09:57
Re: Mode Note 252 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 14:42
Re: Mode Note 244 P Mac 28-Apr-08 15:03
Re: Mode Note 269 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 15:17
Re: Mode Note 208 P Mac 28-Apr-08 17:20
Re: Mode Note 261 Citizen Attorney 29-Apr-08 04:07
Re: Same fallacy 222 P Mac 28-Apr-08 14:41
Re: Same fallacy 265 Citizen Attorney 29-Apr-08 04:05
Re: Same fallacy 188 The Kwuda 01-May-08 08:01
Re: Same fallacy 246 Raja 01-May-08 08:19
Re: Same fallacy 258 The Kwuda 01-May-08 08:48
Re: Same fallacy 270 legionromanes 03-May-08 15:56
Re: Same fallacy 293 P Mac 08-May-08 23:05
Atlan Orgins 276 The Kwuda 02-May-08 14:44
Re: Atlan Orgins 290 P Mac 03-May-08 11:42
Raja and P Mac 251 The Kwuda 02-May-08 17:16
Re: Enlightened? 240 loveritas 01-May-08 11:02
Re: Enlightened? 264 The Kwuda 02-May-08 06:54
Re: Same fallacy 214 P Mac 01-May-08 12:02
Re: Same fallacy 212 The Kwuda 02-May-08 07:32
Addendum 220 The Kwuda 02-May-08 08:42
Re: Same fallacy 214 P Mac 03-May-08 16:08
Re: Same fallacy 265 Susan Doris 03-May-08 17:47
Re: Same fallacy 233 P Mac 03-May-08 20:17
Re: Same fallacy 274 Susan Doris 04-May-08 09:57
Re: Same fallacy 233 P Mac 04-May-08 13:27
Re: blanket dismissals 201 P Mac 27-Apr-08 21:36
Re: blanket dismissals 287 drrayeye 27-Apr-08 22:35
Re: blanket dismissals 287 P Mac 28-Apr-08 13:17
Re: blanket dismissals 224 Ghia 28-Apr-08 02:59
Re: blanket dismissals 224 Raja 27-Apr-08 22:09
Re: blanket dismissals 230 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 22:43
Re: blanket dismissals 240 Raja 28-Apr-08 06:10
Re: blanket dismissals 278 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 14:55
Re: The Evidence of Mu 217 Raja 27-Apr-08 21:43
Re: The Evidence of Mu 238 Rob Miller 27-Apr-08 21:57
Re: The Evidence of Mu 210 Raja 28-Apr-08 05:59
Re: The Evidence of Mu 258 Raja 28-Apr-08 06:28
Re: The Evidence of Mu 203 Rob Miller 28-Apr-08 14:43
Re: The Evidence of Mu 215 legionromanes 27-Apr-08 22:00
Re: The Evidence of Mu 218 Raja 28-Apr-08 06:17
Re: The Evidence of Mu 256 P Mac 27-Apr-08 22:03
Re: The Evidence of Mu 263 Susan Doris 28-Apr-08 07:36
Re: The Evidence of Mu 252 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 14:38
Re: The Evidence of Mu 261 Raja 28-Apr-08 19:51
Re: The Evidence of Mu 279 Raja 28-Apr-08 20:32
Re: The Evidence of Mu 277 P Mac 28-Apr-08 21:43
Re: The Evidence of Mu 217 Raja 29-Apr-08 04:44
Re: The Evidence of Mu 264 The Kwuda 27-Apr-08 08:27
Re: The Evidence of Mu 269 michael seabrook 23-Mar-11 21:00
Re: The Evidence of Mu 266 P Mac 23-Mar-11 21:35
Re: The Evidence of Mu 233 michael seabrook 23-Mar-11 21:56
Re: 18,000ft down.....40,000 PSI 218 Thunderbird 23-Mar-11 22:32
Re: 18,000ft down.....40,000 PSI 225 michael seabrook 23-Mar-11 22:40
Re: 18,000ft down.....40,000 PSI 269 W_C_Sally 29-Aug-11 11:07
Re: Galactic Incursion 262 Thunderbird 31-Aug-11 01:30
Re: The Evidence of Mu 280 Essan 01-Sep-06 11:52
Re: The Evidence of Mu 277 Citizen Attorney 02-Sep-06 14:21
Re: The Evidence of Mu 249 Citizen Attorney 02-Sep-06 14:37
Ancients of Mu Mu 265 Oddity 23-Apr-08 23:24
Re: The Evidence of Mu 225 ethicswideboy 24-Apr-08 14:04
Re: The Evidence of Mu 282 warrenb 24-Apr-08 14:14
Re: The Evidence of Mu 253 ethicswideboy 24-Apr-08 14:39
Re: The Evidence of Mu 244 warrenb 25-Apr-08 14:12
Re: The Evidence of Mu 207 michael seabrook 25-Apr-08 20:41
Re: The Evidence of Mu 235 Raja 24-Apr-08 21:14
Re: The Evidence of Mu 206 P Mac 25-Apr-08 12:17
Re: The Evidence of Mu 226 michael seabrook 25-Apr-08 21:04
Re: The Evidence of Mu 239 Elantara 05-Oct-08 02:24
Re: The Evidence of Mu 298 Susan Doris 05-Oct-08 07:03
The origins of the name: LEMURIA 268 banyan tree 27-Apr-08 04:33
Re: The origins of the name: LEMURIA 207 Raja 27-Apr-08 05:59
Re: The origins of the name: LEMURIA 314 legionromanes 28-Apr-08 01:56
Re: The origins of the name: LEMURIA 205 AmadeusD 23-Mar-11 22:52
Re: The origins of the name: LEMURIA 231 carolb 23-Mar-11 23:40
Re: The origins of the name: LEMURIA 223 AmadeusD 24-Mar-11 01:19
Genetically based map of Mu 265 drrayeye 27-Apr-08 16:53
Re: Genetically based map of Mu 223 banyan tree 28-Apr-08 01:22
Re: The Evidence of Mu 283 spaceyhippie 02-May-08 10:14
Re: The Evidence of Mu 245 Citizen Attorney 04-May-08 05:53
Re: The Evidence of Mu 245 spaceyhippie 04-May-08 12:25
Re: The Evidence of Mu 217 Hoppy 08-May-08 23:59
Re: The Evidence of Mu 238 legionromanes 09-May-08 01:02
Re: The Evidence of Mu 271 Madonna 04-Sep-11 03:19
Re: The Evidence of Mu 205 Madonna 04-Sep-11 03:33


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.