Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I have provided already a detailed critique in three postings about Hancock's methods re: age of Antartican ice, Tiwanaku and C-14. Nobody has replied in any substantive way to any of them. I see no reason, then, to waste my time offering another long critique of yet another of Hancock and Bauval's claims to which nobody will reply. My inclination is to believe that any response would be, "Well yeah, but what about (fill in the blank) claim?" That road is endless.

Let me, instead, ask you to reply to any of my three postings on Hancock's methods.

GF

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
a typical response of mr. Fagan 442 Christophe Leijnen 30-Nov-00 18:51
same message as above (sorry) 223 Christophe L. 30-Nov-00 19:03
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 239 Garrett Fagan 01-Dec-00 00:12
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 328 Geoff Stocks 01-Dec-00 02:38
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 198 Dr E 01-Dec-00 12:11
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 196 Geoff Stocks 01-Dec-00 20:43
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 243 Christophe L. 01-Dec-00 11:12
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 230 Garrett Fagan 01-Dec-00 20:38
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 225 R. Avry Wilson 01-Dec-00 13:25
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 211 Garrett Fagan 01-Dec-00 20:43
RE: a typical response of mr. Fagan 222 Geoff Stocks 01-Dec-00 20:47


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.