>People like Geoff will fail to see this tactic for what it is,
you don't know whether I "see" or "fail to see" any tactics.
As far as I was concerened this was a discussion albeit in open forum, between Graham and Garret, I could not influence and agreement these two people made between themselves,
I just read the post and made an off the cuff remark siding with Grahams approach to Garret, with flipant ease.
The "tactics" either party uses, is irrelevant to me, I'm only interested in the outcome, if debated in open forum, as here.
So please reserve judgement, before assuming anything
my mum told me if you ASSUME anything, it will end up
making an ASS out of U and ME.......see
|Debate||406||Garrett Fagan||29-Nov-00 22:05|
|RE: Debate||292||Graham Hancock||30-Nov-00 01:37|
|RE: Debate||184||Geoff Stocks||30-Nov-00 01:56|
|RE: Debate||188||jameske||30-Nov-00 03:39|
|RE: Debate||175||Garrett Fagan||30-Nov-00 04:04|
|RE: Debate||207||Graham Hancock||30-Nov-00 11:32|
|RE: Debate||177||Dr E||30-Nov-00 11:52|
|WEAR SPECTACLES||175||Bryan||30-Nov-00 12:56|
|RE: WEAR SPECTACLES||168||Sharif||30-Nov-00 13:16|
|RE: WEAR SPECTACLES||183||Dr E||30-Nov-00 13:59|
|RE: WEAR SPECTACLES||236||Bryan||30-Nov-00 15:18|
|RE: WEAR SPECTACLES||158||Dr E||30-Nov-00 18:04|
|RE: Debate||216||Mark||30-Nov-00 09:57|
|RE: Debate||149||Geoff Stocks||30-Nov-00 19:54|
|RE: Debate||177||jameske||30-Nov-00 01:53|