Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums

For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).

Hi Jim.

Many thanks for for those supportive words.

Im only back till the weather improves so i can get back to hitting more golf balls into the trees .

But in the mean time i found another interesting coincidental sum using the inch unit, as for whether they used it or not, then i have to admit that so far no evidence has been found to substantiate its use , all i can say is that only by using the inch in the fashion i do will give up all those Earth related commensurate numbers.

Anyway here's another diagram showing how when multiplying height with base and then dividing it by Earths orbital period , and then dividing it by the mile number in feet will give you the correct figures for Earths Meridional circumference .

If G2 was designed with the 3-4-5 ratio in mind then G2's mean base should have been 8482.32" based on a height of 5654.88", Petries mean base of some 8475" based on the 3-4-5 ratio would result in a height of 5650" slightly outside his suggested + - 13" leeway from his 5664" figure, and if you go to Petries top end then G2's height becomes 5677", and on the 3-4-5 ratio its base would be 8515.5".

So the question is were they going for the 3-4-5 , if yes then the 24859.73 finding does not exist.

DPP

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 17-Apr-17 19:48 by DUNE.

Many thanks for for those supportive words.

Im only back till the weather improves so i can get back to hitting more golf balls into the trees .

But in the mean time i found another interesting coincidental sum using the inch unit, as for whether they used it or not, then i have to admit that so far no evidence has been found to substantiate its use , all i can say is that only by using the inch in the fashion i do will give up all those Earth related commensurate numbers.

Anyway here's another diagram showing how when multiplying height with base and then dividing it by Earths orbital period , and then dividing it by the mile number in feet will give you the correct figures for Earths Meridional circumference .

If G2 was designed with the 3-4-5 ratio in mind then G2's mean base should have been 8482.32" based on a height of 5654.88", Petries mean base of some 8475" based on the 3-4-5 ratio would result in a height of 5650" slightly outside his suggested + - 13" leeway from his 5664" figure, and if you go to Petries top end then G2's height becomes 5677", and on the 3-4-5 ratio its base would be 8515.5".

So the question is were they going for the 3-4-5 , if yes then the 24859.73 finding does not exist.

DPP

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 17-Apr-17 19:48 by DUNE.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.