Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
To me it seems that not that many people on this site unequivocally agree with Grahams point of view, many are very interested in his point of view, many think he is onto something, but few are totally sold. Most of us are questioning, and exploring the evidence. I.E. we have open minds and are able to consider what he says as possibilities.

You and your ilk however are here for one reason, to cause argument and muddy the waters. By fully backing the orthodox view your only achievements are to stir up disagreement, forcing artificial black and white arguments, with all those who are interested in Grahams work coming down on his side, because they feel their freedom to think originally being threatened.

Do you think the past is sorted, do you think that we have all the major stuff sorted out? if so why? there is not enough evidence to be absolutely certain about much of history. What is believed to be solid evidence today could quite easily be over turned in the future. It has happened before and it will happen again. Many Victorians thought that everything had been sorted. And they have already been proved wrong.

To Everyone:
Since I've used 'we', can others please back me up (or not) as you please.
Do you totally agree with Graham/Robert, agree with some, and find what he says interesting, or do you totally disagree.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
CSICOP retires 381 CSICOP 29-Nov-00 12:15
RE: CSICOP retires 131 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 13:45
RE: CSICOP retires 221 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 14:27
RE: CSICOP retires 143 Mark 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 171 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:19
RE: CSICOP retires 149 Sky 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 168 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:25
RE: CSICOP retires 259 laura 29-Nov-00 18:47
RE: CSICOP retires 214 Margaret 29-Nov-00 23:10
RE: CSICOP retires 180 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:20
RE: CSICOP retires 194 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:27
RE: CSICOP retires 204 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:29
RE: CSICOP retires 136 Gav 29-Nov-00 17:01
RE: CSICOP retires 179 Dr E 29-Nov-00 17:54
RE: CSICOP retires 157 Julia 30-Nov-00 04:40
RE: CSICOP retires 189 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:51
CSICOP stalking 212 Fuzzy 30-Nov-00 11:08
RE: CSICOP stalking 174 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 20:26
RE: CSICOP retires 221 Michael 29-Nov-00 16:24
RE: CSICOP retires 196 Robert G. Bauval 29-Nov-00 19:48
RE: CSICOP retires 207 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:31
RE: CSICOP retires 182 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:19
RE: CSICOP retires 141 Vince 01-Dec-00 02:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.