Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
To me it seems that not that many people on this site unequivocally agree with Grahams point of view, many are very interested in his point of view, many think he is onto something, but few are totally sold. Most of us are questioning, and exploring the evidence. I.E. we have open minds and are able to consider what he says as possibilities.

You and your ilk however are here for one reason, to cause argument and muddy the waters. By fully backing the orthodox view your only achievements are to stir up disagreement, forcing artificial black and white arguments, with all those who are interested in Grahams work coming down on his side, because they feel their freedom to think originally being threatened.

Do you think the past is sorted, do you think that we have all the major stuff sorted out? if so why? there is not enough evidence to be absolutely certain about much of history. What is believed to be solid evidence today could quite easily be over turned in the future. It has happened before and it will happen again. Many Victorians thought that everything had been sorted. And they have already been proved wrong.

To Everyone:
Since I've used 'we', can others please back me up (or not) as you please.
Do you totally agree with Graham/Robert, agree with some, and find what he says interesting, or do you totally disagree.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
CSICOP retires 403 CSICOP 29-Nov-00 12:15
RE: CSICOP retires 143 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 13:45
RE: CSICOP retires 234 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 14:27
RE: CSICOP retires 159 Mark 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 190 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:19
RE: CSICOP retires 161 Sky 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 183 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:25
RE: CSICOP retires 273 laura 29-Nov-00 18:47
RE: CSICOP retires 236 Margaret 29-Nov-00 23:10
RE: CSICOP retires 206 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:20
RE: CSICOP retires 218 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:27
RE: CSICOP retires 220 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:29
RE: CSICOP retires 149 Gav 29-Nov-00 17:01
RE: CSICOP retires 191 Dr E 29-Nov-00 17:54
RE: CSICOP retires 169 Julia 30-Nov-00 04:40
RE: CSICOP retires 201 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:51
CSICOP stalking 229 Fuzzy 30-Nov-00 11:08
RE: CSICOP stalking 187 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 20:26
RE: CSICOP retires 244 Michael 29-Nov-00 16:24
RE: CSICOP retires 213 Robert G. Bauval 29-Nov-00 19:48
RE: CSICOP retires 225 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:31
RE: CSICOP retires 194 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:19
RE: CSICOP retires 156 Vince 01-Dec-00 02:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.