Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
To me it seems that not that many people on this site unequivocally agree with Grahams point of view, many are very interested in his point of view, many think he is onto something, but few are totally sold. Most of us are questioning, and exploring the evidence. I.E. we have open minds and are able to consider what he says as possibilities.

You and your ilk however are here for one reason, to cause argument and muddy the waters. By fully backing the orthodox view your only achievements are to stir up disagreement, forcing artificial black and white arguments, with all those who are interested in Grahams work coming down on his side, because they feel their freedom to think originally being threatened.

Do you think the past is sorted, do you think that we have all the major stuff sorted out? if so why? there is not enough evidence to be absolutely certain about much of history. What is believed to be solid evidence today could quite easily be over turned in the future. It has happened before and it will happen again. Many Victorians thought that everything had been sorted. And they have already been proved wrong.

To Everyone:
Since I've used 'we', can others please back me up (or not) as you please.
Do you totally agree with Graham/Robert, agree with some, and find what he says interesting, or do you totally disagree.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
CSICOP retires 391 CSICOP 29-Nov-00 12:15
RE: CSICOP retires 137 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 13:45
RE: CSICOP retires 228 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 14:27
RE: CSICOP retires 150 Mark 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 182 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:19
RE: CSICOP retires 156 Sky 29-Nov-00 15:15
RE: CSICOP retires 176 Brian A 29-Nov-00 18:25
RE: CSICOP retires 265 laura 29-Nov-00 18:47
RE: CSICOP retires 229 Margaret 29-Nov-00 23:10
RE: CSICOP retires 195 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:20
RE: CSICOP retires 208 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:27
RE: CSICOP retires 212 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:29
RE: CSICOP retires 142 Gav 29-Nov-00 17:01
RE: CSICOP retires 184 Dr E 29-Nov-00 17:54
RE: CSICOP retires 164 Julia 30-Nov-00 04:40
RE: CSICOP retires 196 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:51
CSICOP stalking 218 Fuzzy 30-Nov-00 11:08
RE: CSICOP stalking 181 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 20:26
RE: CSICOP retires 237 Michael 29-Nov-00 16:24
RE: CSICOP retires 203 Robert G. Bauval 29-Nov-00 19:48
RE: CSICOP retires 218 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 01:31
RE: CSICOP retires 189 Dr E 30-Nov-00 10:19
RE: CSICOP retires 149 Vince 01-Dec-00 02:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.