Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
at last Mr Fagan, good to hear from you.

you said
>Buildings, burials, writings, you name it, it's there.

your of course right it is all there, but "most" of it is
you have to agree though is speculation and interpretation.

the book of the dead, the bible, hyroglyphs, egyptian/ mayan.
building interpretation - unless catagorically backed up by indisputable text interpretation.

You may think I'm an avid Hancock fan with no independant thought
I assure you I am not, but I do like what he has to put forward, and I'm grateful to him in a way for being the one to stand up and be counted, he and others like him have stretched the imagination of "possibilities" that, like the books you refer to, seem to lack or purposly leave out.

I have read many books on history and other things, I keep an open mind, dissmiss nothing untill proven otherwise, even your side of the arguament, but sadley your side proves nothing either just alternative hypothisis', there's no right or wrong here, just alternative views, both can hold water.

the trouble is futher back in time its obvious to anyone the "evidence" for want of a better word, is harder to find, the world isn't a geologically stable, features in the landscape change, the San Andreas fault, volcanoes, ice ages, floods,rivers change courses, who knows what has been lost, maybe, like you say in a sense - nothing, but NOBODY is sure are they.

Can you honestly put hand on heart and say you know exactly what has gone before - i don't think anybody can, even Mr hancock.

All possibilites are relevant, why not work it out together and be done with it once and for all - either way, i don't care, all Im after is some kind of truth - aren't we all?

geoff Stocks

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Fagan vs. Hancock 431 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 18:00
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 200 CSICOP 28-Nov-00 18:27
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 185 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 18:38
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 174 CSICOP 28-Nov-00 18:49
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 178 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 19:26
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 275 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:22
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 202 Christophe Leijnen 30-Nov-00 10:53
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 134 Geoff Stocks 30-Nov-00 20:31
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 186 Garrett Fagan 01-Dec-00 00:33
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 238 Geoff Stocks 01-Dec-00 04:51
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 188 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 18:27
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 223 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 19:12
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 265 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:33
RE: Fagan vs. Hancock 174 Christophe Leijnen 30-Nov-00 11:04
Fagan: Do you know of Carl Munck's work? 388 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 20:26

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.