Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm really amazed that and Graham Hancock and Mr. Bauval have taken the time to reply to Mr. Fagan's message in such an elaborate way. However i also believe that this will not convince Mr. Fagan and his friends. What is does do is strengthen my believe in the theories of Mr. Hancock. Indeed one should be very careful with the C14 method. It simply cannot date stone so researchers often take artefacts from the site and date these in order to date the site itself. Needless to say that this method is open to debate! I believe it is through this method scientist have dated Machu Pichu at 400 AD? Although the inca's themself claim the monument was build a long long time ago. (I can't exactely name a source here).

I look forward to the broadcast on december 14th.

greetings,
ch.l.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Hancock's Challenge: A Response 448 Garrett Fagan 27-Nov-00 22:34
C-14 an academic joke!! 167 William John Meegan 27-Nov-00 23:52
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 161 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 00:05
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 161 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 00:11
Be more inventive than that: PLEASE 156 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 00:55
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 165 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 00:50
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 156 jameske 28-Nov-00 00:23
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 160 oziris 28-Nov-00 02:10
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 145 Bryan 28-Nov-00 02:18
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 157 Brian A 28-Nov-00 14:50
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 153 Bryan 28-Nov-00 14:58
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 169 Brian A 28-Nov-00 14:48
To Brian 152 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 15:35
RE: WJ Meegans sanity 157 CSICOPdivision2 28-Nov-00 16:53
CSICOP is a very rude child: a cry baby 122 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 17:26
RE: CSICOP is a very rude child: a cry baby 153 Bryan 29-Nov-00 02:19
RE: To Brian 200 Brian A 29-Nov-00 17:41
To Brian: THE KABBALISTIC QUEST 186 William John Meegan 01-Dec-00 01:57
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 197 Graham Hancock 28-Nov-00 02:24
RE: Hancock The Underdog 120 Mark 28-Nov-00 11:42
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 164 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 16:10
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 193 Graham Hancock 28-Nov-00 19:10
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 119 laura 28-Nov-00 21:27
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 127 CSICOP 29-Nov-00 09:29
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 192 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 10:37
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 149 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:02
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 170 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:51
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 150 Pilgrim333 28-Nov-00 05:22
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 166 Sky 29-Nov-00 17:24
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 157 Robert G. Bauval 28-Nov-00 07:40
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 149 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 11:08
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 153 R. Avry Wilson 28-Nov-00 11:55
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 139 Mark 28-Nov-00 12:41
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 159 R. Avry Wilson 28-Nov-00 13:43
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 160 Mark 28-Nov-00 13:49
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 171 Pilgrim333 29-Nov-00 01:12
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 152 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:49
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 184 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 11:18


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.