Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm really amazed that and Graham Hancock and Mr. Bauval have taken the time to reply to Mr. Fagan's message in such an elaborate way. However i also believe that this will not convince Mr. Fagan and his friends. What is does do is strengthen my believe in the theories of Mr. Hancock. Indeed one should be very careful with the C14 method. It simply cannot date stone so researchers often take artefacts from the site and date these in order to date the site itself. Needless to say that this method is open to debate! I believe it is through this method scientist have dated Machu Pichu at 400 AD? Although the inca's themself claim the monument was build a long long time ago. (I can't exactely name a source here).

I look forward to the broadcast on december 14th.

greetings,
ch.l.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Hancock's Challenge: A Response 515 Garrett Fagan 27-Nov-00 22:34
C-14 an academic joke!! 180 William John Meegan 27-Nov-00 23:52
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 181 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 00:05
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 177 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 00:11
Be more inventive than that: PLEASE 173 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 00:55
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 185 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 00:50
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 171 jameske 28-Nov-00 00:23
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 179 oziris 28-Nov-00 02:10
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 160 Bryan 28-Nov-00 02:18
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 186 Brian A 28-Nov-00 14:50
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 177 Bryan 28-Nov-00 14:58
RE: C-14 an academic joke!! 193 Brian A 28-Nov-00 14:48
To Brian 164 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 15:35
RE: WJ Meegans sanity 170 CSICOPdivision2 28-Nov-00 16:53
CSICOP is a very rude child: a cry baby 129 William John Meegan 28-Nov-00 17:26
RE: CSICOP is a very rude child: a cry baby 165 Bryan 29-Nov-00 02:19
RE: To Brian 212 Brian A 29-Nov-00 17:41
To Brian: THE KABBALISTIC QUEST 208 William John Meegan 01-Dec-00 01:57
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 216 Graham Hancock 28-Nov-00 02:24
RE: Hancock The Underdog 142 Mark 28-Nov-00 11:42
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 176 Garrett Fagan 28-Nov-00 16:10
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 222 Graham Hancock 28-Nov-00 19:10
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 141 laura 28-Nov-00 21:27
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 150 CSICOP 29-Nov-00 09:29
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 223 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 10:37
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 171 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:02
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 188 Graham Hancock 29-Nov-00 15:51
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 169 Pilgrim333 28-Nov-00 05:22
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 198 Sky 29-Nov-00 17:24
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 170 Robert G. Bauval 28-Nov-00 07:40
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 162 Christophe Leijnen 28-Nov-00 11:08
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 168 R. Avry Wilson 28-Nov-00 11:55
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 149 Mark 28-Nov-00 12:41
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 173 R. Avry Wilson 28-Nov-00 13:43
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 172 Mark 28-Nov-00 13:49
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 186 Pilgrim333 29-Nov-00 01:12
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 161 Garrett Fagan 29-Nov-00 15:49
RE: Hancock's Challenge: A Response 220 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 11:18


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.