Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The Swath image should be rotated about 15 degrees more in the clockwise direction to line up with the Viking image.
The dark region to the right has some strange looking things in it but is not the original "Face" feature.
The region in the rectangular outline is the reason that artificiality is suggested.
The hypothesis was that the feature under consideration from the Viking images of 20 + years ago is artificial. If someone were to test this hypothesis they might say get me a closer image realizing that this would cut down the field. If they were given a closer image that only contained what looked like the "eyebrow" region on the Viking images (there are at least 8 Viking images of this feature)a prediction might be, if the feature was artificial a closer better resolution image might give an artistic impression of individual eyebrow hairs if the feature was natural the law of increasing entropy would make any "dunes"
disperse and look less like an "eyebrow".
The result was that the "dunes" didn't randomly disperse after 24 years in the Martian wind, but rather upon closer inspection the feature looked even more like an "eyebrow" with individual eyebrow hairs being visible.

Theories have been suggested that the structure was "drawn" by a particle beam from above (the "face" is aproximately 6 miles by 6 miles) melting sand to a dark glassy material. The region to the right could have been "doodles" as the aerial artist tested his euiptment.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 461 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 26-Nov-00 11:43
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 227 David S 26-Nov-00 19:26
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 216 Pilgrim333 26-Nov-00 20:11
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 210 Christophe Leijnen 26-Nov-00 21:45
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 126 Bryan 26-Nov-00 22:04
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 160 laura 26-Nov-00 22:47
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 192 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 26-Nov-00 23:20
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 205 laura 27-Nov-00 10:15
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 206 Bryan 27-Nov-00 10:21
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 198 laura 27-Nov-00 12:24
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 232 David S 29-Nov-00 08:37
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 251 Sam Kendall 30-Nov-00 03:05
Yes and the 158 Frank Leonard 30-Nov-00 03:59
RE: Yes and the 223 Sam Kendall 01-Dec-00 03:15
RE: Yes and the 198 Frank Leonard 01-Dec-00 05:50
Please give me your opinion 138 Sam K 02-Dec-00 21:37
RE: Please give me your opinion 187 Frank Leonard 02-Dec-00 22:34
Thanks for your opinion 191 Sam K 04-Dec-00 00:52
You're welcome.... 199 Frank Leonard 04-Dec-00 01:23
RE: Please give me your opinion 148 laura 04-Dec-00 09:41
RE: Please give me your opinion 208 Frank Leonard 05-Dec-00 06:02
Do Ya sees Faces with aspects... 198 MARS REVEALER 30-Nov-00 16:12
Planetary Data System - apologize David. 203 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 29-Nov-00 12:09
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 191 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 12:46
NASA can't be trusted 383 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 14:18
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 244 Chronos 29-Nov-00 23:48
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 210 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 14:32
Doctored NASA Face image 194 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 15:37
Doctored NASA Face image 204 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 15:40
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 167 Frank Leonard 29-Nov-00 16:04
RE: Please give me your opinion 198 R. Avry Wilson 04-Dec-00 14:42


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.