Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
"Inertia" is not a founding principle of modern emperical science for nothing. That things tend to keep on doing what they are already doing has a corrolary: things may be assumed to always have been doing what they are currently doing.

When knowledge is limited, and the observable sample is small, it is only by extrapolation in accordance with the principle of Inertia that we can theorize about both the future and the past. Change is not a natural action but an exception requiring the introduction of some force. Unless the existence of a changing force can be demonstrated, Inertia dictates what conclusions we are alowed. We can't just make up the past out of whole cloth.

Working backward through time, if one argues the English were once Celts or that the English were once Picts, you need a force to enter the equasion by which these Picts or Celts might be transformed into English. Orthodoxy realizes this of course, so they appeal to the Anglo-Saxon invasion as the catalist for change. Harper demonstrates however, that this force of foriegn invasion, in every comparable situation where direct observation is possible, has proven inadequate to the task of effecting linguistic change. Orthodoxy must make of the Anglo-Saxon invasion an exception -- so they do so, but without any evidence to demonstrate in what way this invasion might be characterized as exceptional. We have nothing to indicate that the Saxon invasion was any different from the Roman, Danish or Norman conquests (as three specifically British examples) which effected no such change in the spoken language.

Having failed to demonstrate that the Saxon invasion was capable of altering the linguistic landscape of the British Isles, we are left with no choice but to leave Inertia undisturbed -- and conclude that the English were always English.

ISHMAEL

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
AOM: Inertia 101 AOM-Presenter 25-Apr-03 13:28
Re: AOM: Inertia 84 Doug 25-Apr-03 16:56
Ignorance is Bliss 48 AOM-Presenter 25-Apr-03 17:54
Re: Ignorance is Bliss 49 Doug 25-Apr-03 19:52
Re: Ignorance is Bliss 86 hera 25-Apr-03 20:10
Off-hand Comment 84 AOM-Presenter 29-Apr-03 16:44
Re: Off-hand Comment 82 hera 29-Apr-03 17:35
Apologies 87 AOM-Presenter 29-Apr-03 19:26
Re: AOM: Inertia 56 M J Harper 25-Apr-03 18:38
Re: AOM: Inertia 100 nonconformist 26-Apr-03 20:05
Re: AOM: Inertia 49 M J Harper 29-Apr-03 17:42
Re: AOM: Inertia 56 DPCrisp 29-Apr-03 18:14
Re: AOM: Inertia 83 Dr. Sunil 29-Apr-03 18:29
Re: AOM: Inertia 74 jameske 29-Apr-03 18:51
Indus Valley Seals Deciphered 468 Astikapati 29-Apr-03 21:44
Re: Indus Valley Seals Deciphered 130 Dr. Sunil 30-Apr-03 13:52
Re: AOM: Inertia 62 nonconformist 30-Apr-03 04:09
Re: AOM: Inertia 80 BrianAmbrose 30-Apr-03 10:46
Re: AOM: Inertia 68 Doug 30-Apr-03 13:15
Re: AOM: Inertia 92 M J Harper 30-Apr-03 15:40
Re: AOM: Inertia 51 Doug 30-Apr-03 17:22
Re: Stupidity vs Ignorance 68 Doug 25-Apr-03 21:20


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.