Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
"Inertia" is not a founding principle of modern emperical science for nothing. That things tend to keep on doing what they are already doing has a corrolary: things may be assumed to always have been doing what they are currently doing.

When knowledge is limited, and the observable sample is small, it is only by extrapolation in accordance with the principle of Inertia that we can theorize about both the future and the past. Change is not a natural action but an exception requiring the introduction of some force. Unless the existence of a changing force can be demonstrated, Inertia dictates what conclusions we are alowed. We can't just make up the past out of whole cloth.

Working backward through time, if one argues the English were once Celts or that the English were once Picts, you need a force to enter the equasion by which these Picts or Celts might be transformed into English. Orthodoxy realizes this of course, so they appeal to the Anglo-Saxon invasion as the catalist for change. Harper demonstrates however, that this force of foriegn invasion, in every comparable situation where direct observation is possible, has proven inadequate to the task of effecting linguistic change. Orthodoxy must make of the Anglo-Saxon invasion an exception -- so they do so, but without any evidence to demonstrate in what way this invasion might be characterized as exceptional. We have nothing to indicate that the Saxon invasion was any different from the Roman, Danish or Norman conquests (as three specifically British examples) which effected no such change in the spoken language.

Having failed to demonstrate that the Saxon invasion was capable of altering the linguistic landscape of the British Isles, we are left with no choice but to leave Inertia undisturbed -- and conclude that the English were always English.

ISHMAEL

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
AOM: Inertia 346 AOM-Presenter 25-Apr-03 13:28
Re: AOM: Inertia 235 Doug 25-Apr-03 16:56
Ignorance is Bliss 171 AOM-Presenter 25-Apr-03 17:54
Re: Ignorance is Bliss 189 Doug 25-Apr-03 19:52
Re: Ignorance is Bliss 216 hera 25-Apr-03 20:10
Off-hand Comment 236 AOM-Presenter 29-Apr-03 16:44
Re: Off-hand Comment 215 hera 29-Apr-03 17:35
Apologies 217 AOM-Presenter 29-Apr-03 19:26
Re: AOM: Inertia 194 M J Harper 25-Apr-03 18:38
Re: AOM: Inertia 234 nonconformist 26-Apr-03 20:05
Re: AOM: Inertia 149 M J Harper 29-Apr-03 17:42
Re: AOM: Inertia 189 DPCrisp 29-Apr-03 18:14
Re: AOM: Inertia 255 Dr. Sunil 29-Apr-03 18:29
Re: AOM: Inertia 199 jameske 29-Apr-03 18:51
Indus Valley Seals Deciphered 1283 Astikapati 29-Apr-03 21:44
Re: Indus Valley Seals Deciphered 349 Dr. Sunil 30-Apr-03 13:52
Re: AOM: Inertia 233 nonconformist 30-Apr-03 04:09
Re: AOM: Inertia 261 BrianAmbrose 30-Apr-03 10:46
Re: AOM: Inertia 202 Doug 30-Apr-03 13:15
Re: AOM: Inertia 300 M J Harper 30-Apr-03 15:40
Re: AOM: Inertia 172 Doug 30-Apr-03 17:22
Re: Stupidity vs Ignorance 197 Doug 25-Apr-03 21:20


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.