Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> The Double Incline Plain science calculator is
> producing some interesting facts. For pulling
> stones up from the Harbor, the Funicular would
> need to carry nearly 3.8 times the weight of the
> other side. On a 5 degree causeway angle, the COF
> (coefficient of friction) would be 0.05 - 0.06.
> This is the range of becoming in balance, ie.
> reaching a State of Equilibrium. So basically,
> whatever the dimensions are of a Pyramid stone,
> you will need nearly 4 times it's volume in water
> weight, to pull it up the Causeway.

All else being equal the less steep the incline and longer the route the less efficient a funicular is. This can be an important consideration if water is limited or the ability to construct a proper funicular run is limited. No matter the source of the water it was seasonal and likely limited at least at times if not nearly continually. It seems highly likely that it was efficiency and water supply that were the primary limitations to just how large they could build. Pyramids got larger as efficiencies were learned and techniques perfected.

Needing four times the weight of stone in water is no problem, of course, providing they had it and such a significant drop in efficiency didn't come right off the top. I doubt more than 3% of all supplies arrived by the causeway so water usage for this specific funicular would be insignificant. It might have been some of the highest tech on site but water needs were limited.

> A 4 to 1 ratio. Increase the amount of stones
> needed, you need to build a vessel, 4 times as big
> in volume. 

I picture the ascending "boat" (dndndr-boat) as nothing but a sled which would be dwarfed by the (henu boat) counterweight.

> The science calculator also provides the Tension
> involved,...

Cool.

> ...and the rate of speed it would travel.

Equally cool but remember these were primitive materials so acceleration would vary over even short distances.

> The rate of speed, increases as the process takes
> place. It is not a consistent speed.

This acceleration was nominal. Over a long period (a long run) even a small acceleration can result in significant speed so it is important but hardly concerning to engineers who grew up designing and operating these systems.

> They would
> need to bail water, to slow it down, and thereby
> maintain control.

This is hardly impossible but very unlikely. On the causeway it wouldn't matter too much if they ejected so much water that the system stopped short but it mattered a great deal on the pyramid because refilling the counterweight would cause lengthy delays and would be exceedingly dangerous. The primary danger being overfilling a a system not in its proper position resulting in extensive equipment damage. For this reason they would have used other means to brake the system. They would use a robust brake operated by the the filler (ferryman) and probably partly automatic. There are many ways this could be done without damaging the ropes. Once a system was in balance they'd never do anything to get it out of balance because primitive materials were very unforgiving.

> Doing so may have contributed to
> the erosion along side the Sphinx?

It would be a small contribution if they operated it in this manner.

> There is also
> an unexplained ditch, running down alongside the
> Causeway, and into the Sphinx encampment. It
> starts approximately midway down from the Upper
> Temple. Additionally, the rope tension increases
> the faster the vessels travel.

Really! I can hardly imagine the cause. Obviously there is a slight increase in tension on whichever boat is descending but total tension (the force pulling against the pulley) should be constant so long as the grade is constant, I believe.

> The Funicular
> system requires very few men to operate it.
> Gravity and water do the work.
>
> [youtu.be]
>  
> geogebra.org/m/ZeZjAfta
>
> Working on it... the light could be better.
>
> [youtu.be]

Building pyramids was very very easy. Learning how to build pyramids was hard work that took three or four centuries to perfect. Modern people just have no idea and don't care that Egyptology doesn't really care how they were built so they invoke "ramps" and go back to parsing the Pyramid Texts in terms of modern abstractions and the "book of the dead". This is what we call "science" now days.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1267 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 159 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 135 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 140 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 120 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 119 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 124 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 114 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 114 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 122 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 115 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 102 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 109 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 107 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 106 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 102 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 96 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 92 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 87 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 96 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 61 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 97 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 88 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 83 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 83 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 90 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 89 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 88 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 89 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 86 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 86 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 87 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 88 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 89 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 80 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 84 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 89 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 77 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 78 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 92 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 94 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 76 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 77 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 117 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 84 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 90 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 84 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 84 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 79 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 81 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 79 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 81 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 97 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 89 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 116 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 83 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 106 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 98 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 86 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 84 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 76 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 76 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 73 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 71 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 109 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 95 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 84 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 79 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 87 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 75 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 90 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 75 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 78 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 73 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 80 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 68 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 75 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 70 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 81 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 74 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 81 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 76 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 93 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 86 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 87 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 80 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 75 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 79 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 68 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 74 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 73 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 72 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 67 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 67 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 81 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 75 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 77 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 73 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 72 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 63 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 89 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 77 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 72 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 70 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 70 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 75 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 83 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 76 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 79 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 71 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 84 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 71 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 71 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 73 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 69 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 70 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 73 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 73 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 82 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 72 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 69 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 74 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 74 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 72 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 83 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 74 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 83 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 74 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 75 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 69 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 86 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 74 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 81 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 80 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 72 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 97 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 93 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 87 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 81 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 76 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 79 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 88 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 74 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 78 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 73 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 75 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 67 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 97 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 78 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 75 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 74 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 75 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 77 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 75 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 73 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 75 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 78 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 77 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 77 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 103 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 83 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 98 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 85 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 73 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 47 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 48 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 45 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 50 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 53 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 70 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 48 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 47 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 46 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 36 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 35 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 50 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 41 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 36 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 41 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 69 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 50 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 47 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 33 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 31 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 37 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 51 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 26 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 21 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 37 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 39 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 36 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 30 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 34 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 40 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 33 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 37 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 41 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 30 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 45 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 26 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 42 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 32 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 31 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 26 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 34 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 26 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 34 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 30 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 27 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 26 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 30 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 29 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 31 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 30 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 29 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 24 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 28 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 36 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 39 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 41 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 34 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 41 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 44 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 42 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 64 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 52 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 43 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 46 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 49 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 43 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 43 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 51 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 47 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 48 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 46 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 44 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 44 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 43 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 46 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 49 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 46 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 66 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 66 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 34 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 50 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 42 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 32 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 35 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 48 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 38 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 43 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 41 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 37 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 54 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 37 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 38 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 36 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 34 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 42 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 43 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 40 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 40 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 42 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 42 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 40 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 47 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 42 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 42 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 46 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 46 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 49 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 54 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 40 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 32 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 47 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 47 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 47 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 42 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 40 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 45 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 88 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 49 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 53 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 44 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.