Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hanslune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Clayton Wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Hanslune,
> >
> > It is simpler than that.
> >
> > There is plenty of water even today, situated
> > behind the Pyramids. It wells up in a number of
> > locations. You can use Google Earth, and find
> > them, or I can show you with longitude
> settings.
> > Can you use Google Earth? They well up and
> > disappear on a regular basis. It was much
> wetter
> > 4,500 years ago. Not like what we see today.
> And,
> > as water runs downhill, they had a constant
> > source. They were proficient ditch diggers,
> which
> > is well documented. I spend the better part of
> a
> > year researching all the potential water
> sources,
> > creating height maps and terrain mapping. There
> > are a few which are within 1-2 hours walking
> > distance. The Nile has plenty of water. Water
> from
> > rain. Monsoons swept down from India on a
> regular
> > basis.
>
> Monsoons?
>
>
> So again where were the tons of water coming from.
> There is water in the limestone beneath the
> Plateau but how did they lift it up?
>
> The water table is near the surfaces even
> > today. They need to pump water out from
> beneath
> > the Sphinx on a regular basis. Water is
> > surprisingly heavy. A single cubic foot = 62.43
> > lbs.
>
> Yes and the sphinx is nearly the bottom of the
> ridge line
> >  
> > The causeways are the tracks. There are two
> sides
> > to the causeways. Two separate tracks.
>
> okay
>
>
>  As one
> > vessel filled with water slides down one side,
> > the other side was being pulled upward. On that
> > side, the vessel was carrying stones, of the
> same
> > amount of water weight. A true counterbalance.
>
> So you are saying one of the counter-weight drew
> up the other as the other went down?
>
>
> > They were connected with rope(s). Barges, are
> > built to keep water in, as that add ballast.
> > Without that water, the barge is subjected to
> > tipping over. All they did was increases the
> inner
> > framing to hold even more water than usual. The
> > water weight was filled at the top and drained
> at
> > the bottom, as stones were being placed and/or
> > removed. They then switched the water filling
> to
> > the other side, and repeated the operation.
>
> So the downward counterweight had to be filled
> enough to move heavier one and over come friction,
> got there the water was dumped, stones but on it
> while the upwards one was emptied of stone and
> filled with water.
>
> So the problem I see is a source of water getting
> it to the barge and then the runoff of the water
> dumped. How many tones of water do you figure was
> used to draw up the other side - how many ton of
> stones were they bringing up. So are the ramps out
> of the quarries to the point to the causeway?
>
> Once the stone were removed how were they then
> moved up to their place on the pyramid? Or can you
> show in a diagram where the 'station' was? How was
> the pivot constructed and where?
>
> Thanks

Hi Hanslune,

Can you use Google Earth? Please answer me. I will show you the water source.

They drained the water back into the NIle down at the dock. This is also where they loaded the stones, and/or simply engaged the Barge/stones into the system. The later has some additional benefit. It depends, it they were using the system for pulling stones up the Pyramid face, or using men to perform the lift. Both are possible. 

You are no different than the majority of individuals, who do not fully grasp, how heavy water really is. I also once underestimated it. How I became informed, is that I learned Sketchup, a 3D program, which will calculate volume. Once you know the volume, ie. square footage, you can then determine the cubic footage. Next you can multiply that by 62.4lbs., which is the weight of 1 cubic foot of water.  1 cubic foot of water = 62.41 pounds. Additionally, you need to understand, you are working on an Incline Plain, which lessens the amount of force (work load) required in moving the stone uphill on the Causeway dramatically. It lessens the amount of water weight needed to perform the pull.

I have illustrated, and provided links concerning the science behind this relationship, repeatably here on GH for many years. It is a workable physics model. I have no idea, if they knew and understood and used the environment the way I propose. I only show it is possible, and that there is another way to deliver stones up to higher levels, than by using ramps. Ramps were not necessary. At times, it seems I have attacked someones sacred cow...

There are 6 "simple machines" known to mankind. The Incline Plain is one of them, along with levers, wedges, and others ie. pulley, screw, and the wheel and axle. The later three they were likely unaware of, though you can still benefit from a so called Pulley, without an axle. There are indications, they possessed this knowledge. The 2 to 1 rope mechanical advantage, is so simple to have accidentally discovered, it was likely learned thousands of years before the AE. Hang a gut a deer between two near by trees, and you would discover it...

Example: The average size 2.5 ton Pyramid stone measures approx. (127cm, 127cm x 71cm) or ( 50", 50" x 28"). That same volume in water weight = 40.51 cubic feet. Multiply 40.51 x 1 cubic foot of water ( 62.43lbs.) = 2,529 lbs. The water is actually 28 lbs. heavier than the stone.  An barge being 10 feet wide and 30 feet long, and 8 feet tall = 2,400 cubic feet. or 2,400 x 62.43lbs. = 149,832 lbs. That is equivalent to 60 stones in weight. And Yes, that is where they obtained the ability to lift stones, with very little effort. You can custom tailor the size of the barge to the amount of stone you needed, to meet the 1 stone every 3 minutes criteria. The excepted rate required to build the Pyramid in the lifetime of a Pharaoh.

In fact, it is the only scenario that can achieve this rate, and higher if needed. Men pulling stones up ramps is a Myth. That approach, can not deliver enough stone rate needed. I dare anyone, to show me different, while I have just shown you a true possibility. It only required some ingenuity and water. Only people who cannot explain the usage of the causeway, believe they were built for a Funerary purpose. They may have been used in that fashion, after the Pyramid was built, but that was not their primary purpose.

Now do you better understand? Would you like all my links, and pictures to qualify my statements above. So you see, and can prove my scenario works in the real world.

Did they use it? They would have been really stupid, if they were unable to figure this out.




Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1293 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 168 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 147 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 128 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 133 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 125 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 125 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 133 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 126 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 113 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 116 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 117 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 101 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 115 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 111 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 105 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 99 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 97 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 103 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 71 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 106 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 98 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 90 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 94 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 100 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 99 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 97 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 99 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 94 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 93 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 95 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 92 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 96 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 92 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 98 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 91 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 95 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 100 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 93 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 87 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 93 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 104 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 103 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 86 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 86 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 125 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 115 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 101 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 92 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 94 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 92 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 89 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 86 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 92 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 89 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 92 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 109 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 97 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 97 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 89 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 93 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 102 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 125 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 92 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 115 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 107 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 99 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 93 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 96 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 116 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 104 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 101 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 91 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 90 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 95 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 84 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 99 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 85 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 87 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 82 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 93 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 89 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 90 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 87 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 86 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 91 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 91 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 101 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 95 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 98 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 89 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 88 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 81 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 86 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 90 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 74 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 76 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 89 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 88 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 83 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 81 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 80 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 72 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 96 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 86 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 80 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 77 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 79 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 91 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 88 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 92 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 78 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 77 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 82 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 91 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 77 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 91 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 82 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 92 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 84 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 84 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 78 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 93 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 81 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 87 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 80 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 102 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 95 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 88 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 87 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 96 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 94 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 104 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 92 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 97 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 96 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 93 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 90 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 90 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 112 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 91 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 105 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 95 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 80 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 63 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 56 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 53 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 58 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 61 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 78 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 56 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 55 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 51 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 53 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 57 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 50 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 43 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 52 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 49 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 81 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 57 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 54 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 39 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 40 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 44 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 57 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 35 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 30 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 45 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 45 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 42 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 38 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 41 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 46 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 41 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 45 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 50 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 36 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 52 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 34 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 50 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 43 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 38 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 33 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 41 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 33 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 42 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 37 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 33 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 32 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 37 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 36 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 37 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 38 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 35 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 33 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 34 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 43 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 48 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 51 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 55 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 50 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 52 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 62 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 51 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 72 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 61 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 58 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 50 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 51 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 59 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 56 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 56 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 55 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 51 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 52 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 52 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 53 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 57 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 54 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 74 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 74 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 42 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 59 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 50 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 39 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 42 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 56 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 46 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 51 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 49 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 46 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 61 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 44 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 46 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 44 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 44 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 49 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 51 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 48 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 47 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 50 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 59 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 57 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 61 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 47 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 38 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 62 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 99 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 55 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 61 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 51 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.