Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Let me ask you something: Are you more interested
> in the truth or that your theory will be proven
> right?

When I started I ONLY wanted to know how the pyramids were built.

Since I started I have gained a great deal of interest in the builders of the pyramids. These people were so remarkable and so different than us. We could learn a lot from them about love, understanding, and science. We could learn to see things from their highly fluid perspective.

The people are more interesting than even their understanding and how they made it manifest.

> You have made this into a cult with slogans. This
> is not how you stay objective. It actually
> prevents you from accepting new evidence.

New evidence but the same old thinking. Nothing has changed since the 1882. We are locked into a single reality that isn't going to change despite anyone's effort because there is NEVER GOING TO BE ANY EVIDENCE that can't be interpreted in terms of our assumptions. There's really no substantial difference between the debate about the existence of ancient superstition and the existence of God. We each pick the evidence we consider determininative and brush aside all else.

Slogans are irrelevant. What is relevant is that we all see the world in terms of our expectations. It makes perfect sense to people that superstition provides the willingness and ability to do anything because that's the way we see reality. In a sense it's even true. We can each and collectively achieve virtually anything we set our minds to. So we assume ancient people were just like us.

> The Khufu quarry was to the south. The only viable
> option was to go to the nearest wide open space
> and that was the west side where now is the West
> Field. South + West = Southwest.

I'm not sure what you mean. Please rephrase and elaborate.

> This again is the cult you made for yourself. You
> have created a stereotypical response to the
> concept of ramps and dragging and that mental
> trigger does not allow you to evaluate evidence
> objectively. This is a huge problem Cladking. This
> is the very same problem you accuse
> "Egyptologists", your Boogeymen, of.

So I say you could be right and you respond with this.

Let me elaborate. I believe it is nearly as likely that aliens built the pyramid as it is that superstitious bumpkins dragged them up ramps. There is about a 2% chance that the evidence could have been left as it is because ramps were used. Even that they used magic and caused the stones to grow wings is no more than about 2% less likely than they used ramps.

The evidence CLEARLY shows stones were pulled straight up the sides of five step pyramids one step at a time. There is an 85% probability that the ramps they used were at 70 degrees and the only other major possibility is the ramps were 52 degrees.

Egyptologists are whistling past the graveyard of at least one FAILED ASSUMPTION. They did not use an illogical and inefficient means to build these.

> That is finally the right question to ask.
> The answer appears to involve a combination of
> ramps and another method and that method may have
> depended on the size of the stones which tends to
> decrease as you go up....see Petrie's data which
> shows gradually diminishing waves of course
> thickness

"Gradually diminishing" means "regular". There was no significant change at any point going up.

If they used ANY ramps toward the top then "ramps are still the means to build pyramids. You've not answered or addressed the question but merely reasserted ramps.

> This is why someone should attempt
> to calculate the number of stones in each course
> and their average weight based on some simple
> assumptions and run a statistial analysis on rates
> of assembly as a function of height.

I have said this for years. I don't understand why they refuse to use any methods of modern science to study these structure. While statistics are a weak sister of science they are more closely related to science than "it looks like" or "it seems like'

> No they are not. Highly irregular and varying in
> waves. Come one Cladking. Did you look at Petrie's
> Plate 8?

"Waves" is another term for "regular". A pendulum is always a pendulum no matter which way it swings.

> Ramps cannot explain the whole story, that much is
> clear. But they played a part. This is proven
> beyond a reasonable doubt. The Khufu quarry is
> full of ramp debris. You can see a ramp coming ouf
> it. I even posted photos of it here. You never
> took notice.

It's "full of" ramp debris that has never been defined or measured. It is quite impossible to determine the slope of a ramp from the debris it generates or to determine if it was ever trod at all. Why wouldn't a funicular operate on ramps? How is it possible to even generate hypotheses about the nature of the actual ramps by "full of".

edited to add- Need I point out that if the quarry is "full" of ramps then the ramps are the size of the pyramid? How did they configure these ramps to build straight under a five step cladded pyramid? It is a logical impossibility and would require building pyramids the same volume as the pyramid at least three times. It is patently nonsense. Nobody then or now could build anything under a great pyramid sized pile of anything at all. Much less a five step perfectly true cladded pyramid. This is even considering the effort to lift the pyramid and the mountainous ramps.

Egyptology has never used science to address any of these issues. They made basic assumptions and NEVER SOUGHT TO FALSIFY THEM. It is THEIR methodology that is flawed.

> They are testing as we speak. A full exterior
> pyramid scan is one such project.

One of these "projects" was completed at least three years ago. There are still no data available.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Mar-20 20:06 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1294 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 169 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 157 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 144 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 127 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 149 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 129 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 129 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 133 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 125 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 125 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 133 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 126 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 113 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 118 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 117 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 103 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 115 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 112 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 106 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 101 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 97 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 105 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 72 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 106 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 99 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 91 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 94 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 92 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 100 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 100 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 98 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 95 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 94 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 96 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 93 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 98 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 93 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 99 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 91 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 95 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 100 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 93 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 85 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 87 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 94 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 105 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 103 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 86 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 87 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 116 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 93 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 101 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 95 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 92 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 93 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 87 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 92 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 89 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 92 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 109 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 98 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 95 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 98 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 90 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 93 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 103 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 126 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 92 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 116 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 107 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 95 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 96 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 95 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 117 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 105 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 101 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 91 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 91 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 96 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 84 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 99 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 85 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 87 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 82 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 93 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 89 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 90 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 87 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 87 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 86 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 91 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 91 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 85 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 102 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 95 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 98 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 89 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 89 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 82 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 86 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 90 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 81 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 74 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 76 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 89 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 88 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 83 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 82 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 80 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 72 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 97 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 86 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 80 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 78 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 79 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 91 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 88 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 92 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 79 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 77 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 87 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 82 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 91 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 79 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 91 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 82 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 92 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 84 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 84 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 78 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 94 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 92 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 88 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 80 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 104 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 102 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 96 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 101 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 90 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 88 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 97 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 76 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 94 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 104 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 93 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 97 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 96 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 94 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 90 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 91 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 89 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 112 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 91 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 106 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 96 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 80 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 63 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 56 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 53 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 58 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 61 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 79 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 56 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 55 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 51 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 54 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 57 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 50 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 44 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 52 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 49 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 81 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 57 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 54 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 40 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 40 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 45 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 57 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 35 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 30 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 46 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 45 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 43 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 38 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 41 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 46 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 41 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 45 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 50 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 37 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 52 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 34 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 50 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 44 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 38 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 34 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 41 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 34 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 42 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 37 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 33 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 33 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 37 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 36 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 38 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 38 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 35 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 33 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 34 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 44 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 48 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 52 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 55 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 50 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 52 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 63 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 51 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 74 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 61 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 58 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 50 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 51 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 59 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 56 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 56 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 55 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 52 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 52 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 52 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 54 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 57 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 55 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 74 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 74 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 42 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 59 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 50 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 39 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 42 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 56 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 46 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 51 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 50 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 46 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 61 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 45 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 46 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 45 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 44 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 49 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 51 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 48 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 48 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 59 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 57 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 61 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 47 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 38 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 62 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 99 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 59 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 57 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 56 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 61 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 51 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.