Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> No it does not. You have imposed a meaning on it
> that anyone can clearly see it does not have nor
> would there be any reason for it to.

If you are right that I3.t-wt,.t doesn't mean CO2 then why does "CO2" fit in context?

All anyone is "clearly doing" is parsing the words in the same way the translator did. Then they are clearly ignoring the inconsistencies and contradictions. they are ignoring the fact that the translators have to repair this incantation so it can be translated at all. there are no errors inscribed in the walls. The errors are all errors in interpretation.

I don't know how to say this in words that will get through. Egyptology is wrong about everything and so long as everyone chooses what they have right and what they have wrong no progress will come. They have EVERYTHING WRONG.

> No where does this passage refer to Giza or
> pyramids in any way. The "inundation" has nothing
> to do with geysers but rather, as would make sense
> to anyone, the inundations related to the Nile
> river which have happened every year for thousands
> of years-the very foundation of the existence of
> Nilotic cultures. The "uplands", though vague,
> would more likely refer to Upper Egypt (southern
> Egypt).

I just showed you!!! They said that even their dead buried on thew horizon got inundated some times. You want to pick and choose what to believe even though every single thing the builders said was exactly right.

Here they refer to "Giza" BY NAME and say the bridge builders need a boat;

Utterance 300.

445a. To say: O Hrti of Nsȝ.t, ferryman of the ’Iḳh.t-boat, made by Khnum,
445b. bring this (boat) to N. N. is Seker of R-Śtȝ.w.
445c. N. is on the way to the place of Seker, chief of Pdw-š.
445d. It is our brother who is bringing this (boat) for these bridge-girderers (?) of the desert.

I have no doubt you can explain this all away. You believe scolars are right and ancient people were sun addled so obviously it can be explained away. It's all explained away but it still has a literal meaning and this meaning isd CONSISTENT, COHERENT, and LOGICAL. I believe it is exactly accurate and they did use boats that flew up and alit to build pyramids. No ramps, just common sense.

> Nothing of the sort. Again, no mention of any of
> this in any way shape or form.

Every line in the PT says the same thing; the pyramids were mnemonics to remember the dead king. These are simple rituals that are read when that which ails the king is removed.

> No where do they say this, literal or otherwise.
> Again, you have literally just made all of this
> up.

Of couyrse they said it.

But if you want to pursue this we should find a new thread since we are drifting away from the topic.

> Good grief. My initial response to you was not an
> invitation or excuse to derail yet ANOTHER thread
> with your hobby horsing bat shit crazy. You say
> these same things over and over and over again all
> over the internet and yet anyone who can read,
> even if they do not understand the PT, can clearly
> see for themselves it has nothing to do with
> anything you say it does the least of which
> pyrmaid building, geysers, et al.

You clearly derailed the thread with Egyptological beliefs;

[grahamhancock.com]

There is no evidence to support these contentions. They are strictly beliefs passed down from et al to et al. They are marginally related to the point of my post which concerned pyramid construction and Steve Clayton's theory.

> Maybe you can be honest for once and answer these
> simple questions: we, and by "we" I mean all of
> the countless websites you have been to in the
> last 10+ years mainstream , alt, and fringe
> posters alike, have evaluated your methods and
> conclusions and have rejected them in their
> entirety-why do you keep forcing them on people
> wherever you go? Why do you keep talking about the
> same exact things over and over again?

I'm always talking about facts and logic. I see none in this paragraph. It is an attack and a dismissal of something you refuse to discuss. If you don't like it then don't derail the conversation and don't even respond.

I love talking about the people and the PT. It doesn't really bother me that people don't care what they actually said. It is your choice to ignore them and your choice to not discuss it with me and then blame me for drift.

And by the way. I hate these off topic posts because I get blamed for them by the very individuals who take it off topic. then I get blamed for enjoying talking about the ACTUAL CULTURAL CONTEXT rather than the nonmsense generated by assumptions.

Egyptology is wrong across the board. If you can't remember this simple mnemonic than why talk to me? If an et al ever said it then it is wrong. All opinion about the Egyptians is wrong and we aren't even the same species. They didn't think like Egyptologists yet Egyptologists assume they did.

I'm always interested in evidence and logic but I have no interest in Egyptological opinion. I rarely respond to Egyptological opinion any longer because it excites the peanut gallery. But where that opinion is used to address my beliefs then I do respond.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Study in Ramps 1290 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 17:30
Re: A Study in Ramps 167 Manu 01-Mar-20 18:25
Re: A Study in Ramps 155 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 143 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 126 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:54
Re: A Study in Ramps 146 Warwick 01-Mar-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 128 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 20:11
Addendum 127 Steve Clayton 01-Mar-20 22:51
Re: Addendum 132 Manu 02-Mar-20 02:22
Re: Addendum 123 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 04:56
Re: Addendum 123 Manu 02-Mar-20 11:15
an observation 131 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:26
Re: an observation 124 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:38
Re: an observation 111 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:45
Re: an observation 115 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:52
Point of Order 115 Warwick 02-Mar-20 18:56
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:17
Re: Point of Order 114 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:37
You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 108 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:20
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 104 Warwick 03-Mar-20 05:40
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 98 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:08
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 96 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:45
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 102 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:54
Re: You Meant "Superstitious Idiots" As A Complement? 70 cladking 11-May-20 14:33
Re: an observation 105 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:05
Re: an observation 97 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:56
Re: an observation 89 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:57
Re: an observation 92 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: an observation 89 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:58
One Last Try 98 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:04
20 % of 1.5 Million 98 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:06
I forgot 95 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:07
Re: One Last Try 98 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:18
Re: One Last Try 93 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:33
Re: One Last Try 92 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 19:33
Re: One Last Try 93 Warwick 04-Mar-20 19:48
Re: One Last Try 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:04
Re: One Last Try 95 Warwick 04-Mar-20 20:21
Re: One Last Try 90 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:57
Re: One Last Try 96 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:38
Re: It's Spring 90 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:13
Re: One Last Try 93 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:45
Re: One Last Try 97 Thanos5150 05-Mar-20 16:36
Re: One Last Try 90 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:56
Re: One Last Try 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:57
Re: One Last Try 86 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 13:54
Re: One Last Try 91 cladking 05-Mar-20 15:00
Re: an observation 103 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:36
Re: Addendum 101 SandyJesse 05-Mar-20 23:11
Re: Addendum 83 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:01
Re: Addendum 84 SandyJesse 07-Mar-20 23:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 123 cladking 01-Mar-20 22:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 114 Steve Clayton 02-Mar-20 03:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 91 cladking 02-Mar-20 18:47
Point of Order 99 Warwick 02-Mar-20 19:00
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 02-Mar-20 20:05
Re: Point of Order 93 Warwick 02-Mar-20 23:43
Re: Point of Order 89 cladking 03-Mar-20 02:20
Re: Point of Order 91 Warwick 03-Mar-20 04:32
Re: Point of Order 87 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:40
Re: Point of Order 85 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:14
Re: Point of Order 91 Warwick 03-Mar-20 18:37
Re: Point of Order 87 Open mind 03-Mar-20 19:14
Re: Point of Order - O/T, sort of 90 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:52
Re: Point of Order 107 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 00:09
Re: Point of Order 95 thinkitover 03-Mar-20 05:27
Re: Point of Order 92 cladking 03-Mar-20 14:24
Re: Point of Order 96 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 19:44
Re: Point of Order 87 cladking 03-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 91 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 23:34
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Point of Order 124 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 02:03
Re: Point of Order 89 engbren 04-Mar-20 12:46
Saw Palace Context Sign is pr wr. 113 Manu 04-Mar-20 13:12
Re: Point of Order 98 cladking 04-Mar-20 14:45
Re: Point of Order 106 Manu 04-Mar-20 14:49
Re: Point of Order 97 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:18
Re: Point of Order 92 Manu 04-Mar-20 17:36
Re: Point of Order 94 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Point of Order 91 cladking 07-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 83 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 19:57
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:15
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 18:29
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:44
Re: Point of Order 115 cladking 04-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 103 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 16:23
Re: Point of Order 100 cladking 04-Mar-20 16:43
Re: Point of Order 90 Thanos5150 04-Mar-20 17:38
Re: Point of Order 89 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Point of Order 93 cladking 04-Mar-20 20:47
Burn all the books!!! 81 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:46
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 97 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:02
Re: Rewrite all the books!!! 82 Warwick 05-Mar-20 18:14
...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 84 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:53
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 79 Warwick 05-Mar-20 20:11
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 90 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:02
Re: ...Then We might as well just Chuck the Books. 86 Warwick 05-Mar-20 21:42
Re: Point of Order 89 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:58
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 04-Mar-20 18:48
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:34
Re: Point of Order 84 cladking 06-Mar-20 19:31
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 00:47
Re: Point of Order 76 cladking 07-Mar-20 01:24
Re: Point of Order 82 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 76 cladking 07-Mar-20 20:52
Re: Point of Order 89 Manu 06-Mar-20 20:31
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 06-Mar-20 20:47
ST3W 87 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:16
Re: Point of Order 83 cladking 06-Mar-20 21:18
Ra-st3w 99 Manu 06-Mar-20 21:33
Re: Ra-st3w 93 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:08
Re: Ra-st3w 95 cladking 06-Mar-20 23:23
Re: Ra-st3w 87 cladking 09-Mar-20 03:18
Re: Point of Order 82 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 01:21
Re: Point of Order 86 Manu 08-Mar-20 17:24
Re: Point of Order 76 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 19:07
Re: Point of Order 79 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:21
Re: Point of Order 82 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:01
Re: Point of Order 87 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 78 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 15:38
Re: Point of Order 72 cladking 09-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Point of Order 74 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 20:25
Re: Point of Order 86 Warwick 09-Mar-20 20:48
Re: Point of Order 85 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 23:12
Re: Point of Order 81 Warwick 10-Mar-20 17:01
Re: Point of Order 82 Steve Clayton 10-Mar-20 20:41
Obvious to all?? 80 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:10
after all 78 Warwick 11-Mar-20 17:14
Re: Obvious to all?? 70 cladking 11-Mar-20 18:12
Re: Obvious to all?? 94 Warwick 11-Mar-20 18:19
Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 83 Manu 08-Mar-20 19:28
think conduit 77 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:57
further reading 76 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:00
Re: Khafre Causeway-Logistics before Religion? 77 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:12
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 08-Mar-20 14:32
Re: Point of Order 89 Manu 08-Mar-20 15:01
Re: Point of Order 81 cladking 08-Mar-20 15:44
Re: Point of Order 85 Manu 08-Mar-20 16:03
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:21
Re: Point of Order 89 Thanos5150 08-Mar-20 16:05
Re: Point of Order 76 Warwick 08-Mar-20 19:28
Re: Point of Order 78 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:25
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 20:49
Re: Point of Order 75 Warwick 08-Mar-20 20:59
Re: Point of Order 84 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 22:08
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 08-Mar-20 23:16
Re: Point of Order 79 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:39
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 08-Mar-20 21:05
Re: Point of Order 89 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:44
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:03
Re: Point of Order 76 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 17:40
Re: Point of Order 80 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:09
Re: Point of Order 80 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 17:03
Re: Point of Order 77 cladking 05-Mar-20 17:52
A stupid question 88 Warwick 05-Mar-20 17:55
Re: A stupid question 79 cladking 05-Mar-20 18:47
Re: A stupid question 90 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 17:49
Re: A stupid question 81 Warwick 07-Mar-20 19:14
Re: A stupid question 81 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 23:09
Re: A stupid question 75 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:41
Re: Point of Order 91 Open mind 03-Mar-20 15:26
Re: Point of Order 79 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:07
Re: A Study in Ramps 90 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 17:29
Re: A Study in Ramps 86 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 77 Steve Clayton 07-Mar-20 18:12
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Thanos5150 03-Mar-20 16:10
Re: A Study in Ramps 100 Steve Clayton 03-Mar-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 94 Warwick 03-Mar-20 19:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 98 cladking 03-Mar-20 21:21
Sam Briefly changes Feet 87 Warwick 04-Mar-20 17:27
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:49
Re: Sam Briefly changes Feet 85 Warwick 04-Mar-20 18:12
Rollers and Rope 94 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 16:41
Re: Rollers and Rope 79 Open mind 04-Mar-20 16:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 22:22
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:25
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 15:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Open mind 05-Mar-20 16:08
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 cladking 05-Mar-20 16:32
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:26
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:40
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 cladking 05-Mar-20 21:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 73 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 16:14
Re: Rollers and Rope 92 Steve Clayton 06-Mar-20 02:11
Re: Rollers and Rope 102 cladking 06-Mar-20 15:09
Re: Rollers and Rope 86 Open mind 07-Mar-20 01:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 cladking 04-Mar-20 17:37
Re: Rollers and Rope 80 Open mind 04-Mar-20 19:18
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 cladking 04-Mar-20 19:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 04-Mar-20 21:29
Re: Rollers and Rope 91 Warwick 04-Mar-20 21:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 79 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:24
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:31
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:35
Re: Rollers and Rope 94 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:03
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Warwick 08-Mar-20 18:46
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 21:34
Re: Rollers and Rope 94 Thanos5150 09-Mar-20 00:59
Re: Rollers and Rope 91 Steve Clayton 09-Mar-20 14:15
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 Warwick 09-Mar-20 17:53
Re: Rollers and Rope 79 Open mind 09-Mar-20 18:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Warwick 09-Mar-20 18:27
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 01:55
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:23
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 Open mind 04-Mar-20 22:30
Re: Rollers and Rope 81 cladking 04-Mar-20 22:50
Re: Rollers and Rope 88 Steve Clayton 04-Mar-20 23:06
Re: Rollers and Rope 83 cladking 05-Mar-20 01:01
Re: Rollers and Rope 82 Open mind 05-Mar-20 01:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 00:10
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Open mind 05-Mar-20 00:52
Re: Rollers and Rope 84 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 16:04
Re: Rollers and Rope 85 Open mind 05-Mar-20 18:13
Re: Rollers and Rope 87 Steve Clayton 05-Mar-20 19:10
Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 111 Manu 08-Mar-20 22:32
Re: Khufu Quarry Ramp, G1-X and T.P.'s 89 Steve Clayton 08-Mar-20 23:22
Re: A Study in Ramps 103 Steve Clayton 04-Apr-20 22:14
Re: A Study in Ramps 94 cladking 11-May-20 14:42
Re: A Study in Ramps 78 Steve Clayton 13-May-20 03:06
Re: A Study in Ramps 61 Hanslune 13-May-20 19:58
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 cladking 14-May-20 13:48
The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 54 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:22
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 51 cladking 15-May-20 14:34
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 56 Hanslune 15-May-20 15:25
Re: The reason you always refused to provide drawings of your ideas 60 cladking 15-May-20 17:46
...and he's off and running 76 Hanslune 16-May-20 17:12
Re: ...and he's off and running 54 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 18:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 53 Warwick 18-May-20 19:47
Re: ...and he's off and running 49 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 20:31
Re: ...and he's off and running 51 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:01
Re: ...and he's off and running 41 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:37
Re: ...and he's off and running 41 Warwick 21-May-20 17:28
Re: ...and he's off and running 55 cladking 18-May-20 20:58
Re: ...and he's off and running 46 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:16
Re: ...and he's off and running 41 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 00:06
Re: ...and he's off and running 50 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 16:56
Re: ...and he's off and running 46 Warwick 21-May-20 17:40
Re: ...and he's off and running 78 Sirfiroth 21-May-20 20:44
Re: ...and he's off and running 54 Warwick 22-May-20 02:53
Re: ...and he's off and running 52 Steve Clayton 27-May-20 23:04
Elementary 38 Warwick 28-May-20 16:56
Re: Elementary 39 cladking 28-May-20 20:36
Re: Elementary 43 Warwick 28-May-20 20:51
Walk Like an Egypt(ologist). 56 cladking 29-May-20 13:48
just saw this 32 Warwick 04-Jun-20 20:02
Re: just saw this 27 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:15
Re: Elementary 43 Steve Clayton 28-May-20 21:59
Re: Elementary 44 cladking 29-May-20 13:41
Re: Elementary 41 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 14:14
Re: Elementary 36 cladking 31-May-20 13:37
Re: Elementary 38 Steve Clayton 31-May-20 20:03
Re: Elementary 45 cladking 31-May-20 21:55
Our History is Writ in the Rainbow. 40 cladking 01-Jun-20 14:32
still avoiding the POINT 43 Warwick 01-Jun-20 18:46
Re: still avoiding the POINT 49 cladking 01-Jun-20 21:19
It was the BORG 34 Warwick 02-Jun-20 19:02
Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 51 cladking 03-Jun-20 01:10
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 31 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:35
Re: Reality Itself was Anthropomorphized 48 cladking 03-Jun-20 19:11
Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 41 thinkitover 04-Jun-20 08:41
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 36 cladking 04-Jun-20 13:38
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 31 Warwick 04-Jun-20 17:28
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 39 cladking 04-Jun-20 20:37
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 31 Warwick 04-Jun-20 21:24
Re: Can We Get Back to Chasing Rainbows? :-) 41 cladking 04-Jun-20 21:48
Re: still avoiding the POINT 34 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 16:37
Re: still avoiding the POINT 31 cladking 02-Jun-20 18:45
Re: still avoiding the POINT 30 Warwick 02-Jun-20 18:55
Re: still avoiding the POINT 34 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 20:42
Re: still avoiding the POINT 33 Warwick 02-Jun-20 21:11
Re: still avoiding the POINT 35 Steve Clayton 02-Jun-20 23:05
Doing your work for you 35 Warwick 03-Jun-20 17:56
Re: Doing your work for you 33 Steve Clayton 04-Jun-20 02:12
Re: Doing your work for you 30 Warwick 04-Jun-20 18:03
Re: Doing your work for you 33 Steve Clayton 07-Jun-20 22:14
Re: Doing your work for you 41 Warwick 08-Jun-20 19:47
Re: still avoiding the POINT 45 SandyJesse 13-Jun-20 23:15
Re: still avoiding the POINT 50 Steve Clayton 14-Jun-20 23:19
Re: still avoiding the POINT 51 SandyJesse 18-Jun-20 22:49
Help!!!! 47 Warwick 21-May-20 17:33
Good luck Steve 50 Hanslune 18-May-20 21:55
Re: A Study in Ramps 61 cladking 14-May-20 13:57
Key words run through a database isn't research Cladking 49 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:51
Re: A Study in Ramps 71 LonelyAngel 14-May-20 16:31
Re: A Study in Ramps 58 Hanslune 14-May-20 21:56
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Steve Clayton 18-May-20 21:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 Hanslune 18-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 01:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Hanslune 19-May-20 14:45
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 16:07
Please, leave the windmills to Sam 55 Warwick 19-May-20 18:34
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 48 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 20:05
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 48 Warwick 19-May-20 20:55
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 56 Steve Clayton 19-May-20 21:33
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 54 cladking 20-May-20 02:47
Your lack of evidence isn't a problem you can put on others - its yours 53 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:58
Egyptology's Cultural Context 53 cladking 20-May-20 13:53
Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 49 Hanslune 20-May-20 15:43
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 50 cladking 20-May-20 17:17
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 48 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:02
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 51 Warwick 24-May-20 18:13
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 55 cladking 24-May-20 19:18
In normal conversation... 53 Warwick 24-May-20 19:52
Re: In normal conversation... 72 cladking 25-May-20 01:06
Another final word (waste of time) 73 Warwick 25-May-20 17:52
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 39 Hanslune 26-May-20 14:59
Re: Another final word (waste of time) 58 cladking 26-May-20 15:11
Re: Ramp theory vs Geyser powered Funicular idea 49 Steve Clayton 30-May-20 15:27
Long Live Ramps! 38 cladking 31-May-20 14:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 40 Warwick 20-May-20 18:05
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 54 cladking 20-May-20 20:37
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 43 Warwick 20-May-20 21:55
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 49 cladking 21-May-20 01:01
Re: Egyptology's Cultural Context 47 Warwick 21-May-20 17:17
Re: Please, leave the windmills to Sam 43 Warwick 20-May-20 18:03
REALITY CHECK 59 Warwick 20-May-20 18:02
Re: REALITY CHECK 42 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:28
Re: REALITY CHECK 43 Warwick 20-May-20 22:04
Re: REALITY CHECK 42 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 23:53
Re: REALITY CHECK 41 Warwick 21-May-20 17:12
My boy Luke can eat 50 eggs. n/t 47 cladking 21-May-20 01:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 Hanslune 20-May-20 04:53
The trouble is.. 48 Warwick 20-May-20 18:09
Re: The trouble is.. 45 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 20:15
Re: The trouble is.. 45 Warwick 20-May-20 22:16
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 19:13
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Warwick 20-May-20 22:20
Re: A Study in Ramps 46 Steve Clayton 20-May-20 22:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 SandyJesse 21-May-20 00:08
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 03:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 SandyJesse 21-May-20 04:17
Re: A Study in Ramps 48 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 14:19
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 cladking 21-May-20 14:37
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 cladking 21-May-20 14:53
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 15:38
there's the windmill 54 Warwick 21-May-20 17:05
Re: there's the windmill 59 cladking 22-May-20 13:24
Re: there's the windmill 45 Warwick 25-May-20 17:39
Re: there's the windmill 37 cladking 30-May-20 14:11
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 SandyJesse 21-May-20 15:47
Re: A Study in Ramps 60 Steve Clayton 21-May-20 16:09
Re: A Study in Ramps 52 Warwick 21-May-20 16:46
Re: A Study in Ramps 53 Warwick 21-May-20 17:44
Re: A Study in Ramps 49 Warwick 21-May-20 16:57
Re: A Study in Ramps 46 Warwick 21-May-20 16:40
Re: A Study in Ramps 51 Warwick 21-May-20 16:39
Re: A Study in Ramps 54 Hanslune 22-May-20 17:32
Re: A Study in Ramps 96 Thanos5150 23-May-20 00:00
Re: A Study in Ramps 56 Warwick 24-May-20 18:02
Re: A Study in Ramps 55 cladking 24-May-20 19:22
I've got an idea 54 Warwick 24-May-20 19:47
Re: I've got an idea 59 cladking 24-May-20 19:59
Re: I've got an idea 49 Warwick 25-May-20 17:30


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.