> Every single thing I "made up" comes directly from
> the PT.
No it does not. You have imposed a meaning on it that anyone can clearly see it does not have nor would there be any reason for it to. Many of us have given you a fair shake at one point or another and discussed your interpretations and methods and we have all rejected them on their complete lack of merit and fraudulent methodology. Yet here you are derailing yet ANOTHER thread with your crazy.
> 1944a. + 2 (Nt. 777). The time of inundation comes, the wȝg-festival comes, to the uplands, it comes as Osiris.
> When the water comes to Giza (the uplands) it comes at the geyser and it comes as "atum/osiris". When it comes it ?
> tosses violently" and stands:
No where does this passage refer to Giza or pyramids in any way. The "inundation" has nothing to do with geysers but rather, as would make sense to anyone, the inundations related to the Nile river which have happened every year for thousands of years-the very foundation of the existence of Nilotic cultures. The "uplands", though vague, would more likely refer to Upper Egypt (southern Egypt).
> 1553b. They tremble who see the inundation (when)
> it tosses;
> It even spreads over the graves in the
Nothing of the sort. Again, no mention of any of this in any way shape or form.
> 298c. and will let loose an inundation over the
> This is why they literally said atum/ osiris is a
> cool effervescent column of water that off-gasses
> ’Iḫ.t-wt.t (CO2).
No where do they say this, literal or otherwise. Again, you have literally just made all of this up.
Good grief. My initial response to you was not an invitation or excuse to derail yet ANOTHER thread with your hobby horsing bat shit crazy. You say these same things over and over and over again all over the internet and yet anyone who can read, even if they do not understand the PT, can clearly see for themselves it has nothing to do with anything you say it does the least of which pyrmaid building, geysers, et al.
Maybe you can be honest for once and answer these simple questions: we, and by "we" I mean all of the countless websites you have been to in the last 10+ years mainstream , alt, and fringe posters alike, have evaluated your methods and conclusions and have rejected them in their entirety-why do you keep forcing them on people wherever you go? Why do you keep talking about the same exact things over and over again?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04-Mar-20 17:39 by Thanos5150.