> I presented this evidence more times than I can
> count and the author of these words simply ignores
Oh trying that again huh - okay linked to it? What you can't - what a surprise. You Cladking we are looking for EVIDENCE not your opinions. You have struggled with that for 14 years.
> But since it's on-topic and suits my needs I'll go
> through some of it again anyway and then in the
> next post I'll be told I'm running from the
Hate to tell you this Cladking but your opinions aren't facts.
> The Mesopotamians said there existed a single
> language to "pray to the gods". Of course this is
> a mistranslation of something that actually meant
> "honoring scientific theory".
The link says nothing about what you are claiming - fake link
> This concept also appears all through the Bible
> with the most remarkable being I Corinthians 14.
> There isa also, of course, Genesis which speaks of
> the language becoming confused.
No it talks about
""For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries."
The events they are talking about happened well after 2000 BC.
> But more importantly when the Pyramid Texts and
> Coffin Texts are solved simultaneously with
> reverse engineering the pyramid a new form of
> language can be seen that I call Ancient Language.
Unfortunately for you that is something you just made up
> At some indeterminate point (circa 2000 BC) there
> were no longer enough individuals who spoke AL to
> operate the state.
Unfortunately you made that up.
Even Merer in 2700 BC
> apparently did not speak Ancient Language and he
> had a very important position as the operator of
> what was apparently a "tug boat".
You made that up telling a story you imagine isn't evidence
> speakers after the change in language/ collapse of
> the tower of babel were apparently called
> "Nephilim" and many are listed in the Bible.
That is something you made up
> we have a language that explains how superstitious
> Homo Omnisciencis could survive to invent
> agriculture and cities.
More made up stuff
The existence of this
> language explains how I debunked ramps and showed
> the horizontal and vertical lines that disclose
> the pyramids were built by pulling stones up one
> step at a time.
Yet more made up stuff
It explains w2hy the Bible and
> Sumerians both said there was one language and
> then "confused" people came about.
They don't say that you say that.
> the origin of not only vocabulary including most
> of the ancient words but most modern words as
No it doesn't
It explains how anyone could predict the
> results of the infrared scan.
Now that is truly nutty
AL explains not
> only most of history but gives details about
> pre-history as well.
It explains how it's
> possible that writing was invented in 3200 BC but
> history didn't start until ~2000 BC (the official
> introduction of modern language).
All made up
> But it goes far beyond just this. It shows why
> science doesn't even have a working definition for
> "consciousness". It shows that the basis of life
> is individual consciousness (the only kind in
> existence) and not survival of the fittest.
No it doesn't your opinions aren't facts
> Dates in the distant past are unknown. I have to
> with the dates that Egyptology made up as these
> underlie all of archaeology even though they have
> been scientifically shown to be wrong.
So you state but cannot provide evidence to support your contention
> science I estimate the change in language to be
> around 2000 BC but it's difficult to give a margin
> of error. It was probably between 2100 BC and
> 1850 BC and then some Nephilim survived as late as
> ~ 1200 BC.
Must be fun to make up stuff but what do you do when no one believes you? No evidence
But these are mostly just guesses,
> estimates and speculation.
I have no means of
> knowing Nephilim were AL speakers or how many AL
> speakers there were.
Gosh - why not just make it up? That what you've proven you can do.
There were around 1,000,000
> great pyramid builders living at one time and it
> looks like as few as 20,000 spoke AL.
Again just making stuff up
> these individuals held positions of importance and
> status. They were greatly overrepresented in the
> workers who actually built the pyramids.
Again just keeping the 'making up stuff' machine rolling and rolling
> The simple fact is very very little is actually
You don't say? We are sure lucky you came by and made up all this stuff to fill in the gaps then...lol
This was caused not only by the change in
> language but because this change resulted in the
> destruction of every single book written in AL.
Oh more imagination based on non-reality
> People venerated the ancients and knew they were
> very powerful so they studied the books to death.
> None were understood so none were copied.
...and you know that how?
> interpretations of the ancient words were copied
> far and wide and these formed the basis of the
> Bible and the Coffin Texts.
...and you know that how?
> I won't repeat this tomorrow unless it serves my
No need 99% of it is just stuff you made up and admit so - it isn't evidence, it isn't anything but the ramblings of a fellow who clearly knows nothing about the AE. Your opinions aren't facts, this weird display of making stuff is "proof" you don't know what science is. This is the reason you aren't taken seriously.
This post is hardly comprehensive and
> there are many other reasons and facts that
> support the existence of Ancient Language.
All of which you made up.
And why you've never published any of this blooming nonsense.