> Why do you insist on over thinking.
When you take everything at face value you will become confused by optical illusions, appearances, and your own beliefs. THIS is why science is founded on EXPERIMENT and not what things look like.
egyptologists see word that later people used to mean "God" and then they ASSUME it meant the exact same thing. They see
later superstitions and ASSUME that the pyramid builders sharde them.
The simple fact is we don't know what most of the Coffin Texts mean either and much of it duplicates or parallels the Pyramid Texts. As such it as well dates back even before the written word.
Some readers here might not be aware that there was no "Coffin Texts" at all unlike the Pyramid Texts which were collections of rituals. The Coffin Texts are individual rituals that were written on individual coffins and then collected into a single body by modern Egyptologists. It appears some of the CT were written in Ancient Language but most of it is merely interpretation of ancient rituals by individuals who couldn't read the original language. I believe that when Ancient Language failed almost the entire vocabulary was preserved in the new "confused" languages.
You can call it superstition but you can not show superstition or even how superstitions are possible in a language with no words for "thought" or "belief". You can not5 show how ancient people invented agriculture, cities, and pyramids without science or the language of science. You bought into Egyptological assumptions and don't care if the snakes were defaced in 2500 BC or 1500 BC because they believe nothing changed.