Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
Quote
I probably should get off this hobby horse
> soon?

>
>
>
> Up to you.
>
> How long can one continue to ride (in IMHO) a dead
> horse?
>
> This whole rabbit hole has been dug because of one
> simple reason. As one poster put it, "a lack of a
> basic knowledge of geology," or some such term.

Just as well that you have arrived (valued contribution) so you can clearly, specifically, with references, fill in any lack or knowledge gaps.
I am will be grateful!
>
> Your premise is that the Wall Stones are
> reconstituted limestone from the quarry and
> through some lost technology the organic particles
> were removed; crystalline material was added and a
> binder of sorts was used to make the finished
> product.
>
> This scenario is based on your assumption that all
> limestone is a sedimentary rock produced under
> pressure - mostly by the weight of seawater or
> whatever - hence the marine component.
>
> The quarry limestone exhibits these qualities.

Most limestone is formed in such a fashion. I am aware of stalagmites and stalactites and corals etc.
However, you most likely know much more? Let's see, I believe you.
Or is there something else you are alluding too?
>
>
> However, the Wall limestone has no marine material
> and contains a crystalline component.
>
> Why?
>
> Because it is a different limestone.

Most of the analysis of limestone used in ancient construction that I have seen reported and scientifically analysed, Davidovits, or Barsoum et al, DO have marine shells in them.

I noted from just one post in that ATS thread there was a rock section plate which showed none of such.
Where did that analysis come from? EXACTLY?
Can you link me up to other scientific papers discussing the make up of the stone. PLEASE.
>
> The Wall limestone has been created through
> precipitation in freshwater. Not sedimentation.
>
> That is why I directed you to the Water Temple.

So PLEASE be clear, do you think these walls grew themselves or you think it was harvested from caves and shaped OR WHAT?

Is your wisdom so profound and special that you just want to taunt the forum with cryptic clues?
>
> If you understood the process of precipitation,
> you would understand why the pre Inca called them
> Living Stones and my reference to children and
> having a drink.
>
> The reason that the blocks are in random
> configuration is also tied to this natural
> process. As is the density, hence weight of the
> limestone and the hardness, or softness, of the
> stone at certain stages of its life.

Can you confirm or deny whether you are suggesting this arrangement developed in situ like that naturally? Do you think they are natural fissures and the rocks grew due to precipitation?

Do you not think they are man made ? WHAT is the answer????
>
> But that reason would only cause far more blowback
> from diehard Davidovits fans and mainstream
> sceptics.
>
> I will leave you with my initial image from the
> Water Temple. Pay close attention to it. In
> particular the top right of the central mass and
> the oblong block still in the mass at lower left
> of center.
>
> And then ask yourself, "Why would anyone go the
> trouble of shaping all these small stones around
> the central mass, when it would have been far
> easier to remove the front of the central mass and
> use larger uniform blocks for the entire wall?"

If you look at the bottom then you will see the "central mass" is recessed.
I think the external coating geopolymer mix was a faulty mix and has weathered faster over time.

BUT I AM ALL EARS!!! , and extremely interested in your thorough explanation and source research documents (if you have any) , rather than just more cryptic clues.
>
>
>


Seriously interested
Cheers

EDIT PS

Barbelo, if your reluctance to be specific, is in any way related to your somewhat gnostic belief in the spirit world (Angels Demons etc in the higher realm). Then ,please do not let that retard your requested reply.
It will be given fair and serious consideration, and given it is Graham Hancock's site you are likely to get some 'thumbs up admirers and three cheers' but try to provide some evidence for your claims, whatever they are?
Don't be shy!




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Jan-20 00:59 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 1498 Corpuscles 21-Dec-19 17:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 195 Open mind 22-Dec-19 02:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 154 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 05:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 134 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 thinkitover 23-Dec-19 10:05
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 157 ocka 22-Dec-19 09:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 126 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 18:01
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 123 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiahuanaco architect named 90 molder 23-Dec-19 22:16
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:44
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 88 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:47
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 74 Hanslune 25-Dec-19 01:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 Thanos5150 25-Dec-19 02:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 81 Hanslune 27-Dec-19 23:09
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 75 Thanos5150 28-Dec-19 17:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 89 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 06:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 77 Merrell 29-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 75 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 20:31
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 73 Merrell 29-Dec-19 23:54
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 61 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:03
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 59 Merrell 01-Jan-20 10:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 49 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 66 Open mind 31-Dec-19 19:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 53 Merrell 31-Dec-19 23:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 63 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 56 Open mind 01-Jan-20 03:02
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 89 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 04:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 63 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 05:51
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 78 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 06:59
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 71 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 19:40
Basalt Pavers 67 Barbelo 01-Jan-20 21:33
Re: Basalt Pavers 60 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 23:01
Re: Basalt Pavers 55 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 03:36
Re: Basalt Pavers 67 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:42
Re: Basalt Pavers 58 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 06:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 71 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 02:17
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 75 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:03
Basalt Pillar 76 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 07:15
Re: Basalt Pillar 60 Open mind 02-Jan-20 15:43
Re: Basalt Pillar 67 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 19:06
Re: Basalt Pillar 63 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 77 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 18:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 80 Merrell 02-Jan-20 18:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 121 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 11:15
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 70 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 20:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 62 Merrell 03-Jan-20 21:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 68 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 23:23
Sacsayhuaman 76 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 02:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 03:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 69 Thanos5150 04-Jan-20 03:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 64 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 05:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 112 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 11:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 63 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 66 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 20:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 54 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:55
Re: Sacsayhuaman 57 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 21:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 60 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 23:40
Re: Sacsayhuaman 61 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:59
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Open mind 06-Jan-20 01:08
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 02:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 59 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 03:50
Re: Sacsayhuaman 57 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 04:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 63 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 05:10
Re: Sacsayhuaman 61 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:47
Re: Sacsayhuaman 66 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 16:53
Re: Sacsayhuaman 51 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 19:06
The Limestone Puddle 53 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:27
Re: Sacsayhuaman 57 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 21:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 55 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 22:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 65 Thanos5150 07-Jan-20 17:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 51 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:48
Re: Sacsayhuaman 50 Open mind 06-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 56 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 21:30
Re: Sacsayhuaman 44 Open mind 07-Jan-20 20:43
Re: Sacsayhuaman 48 Open mind 06-Jan-20 13:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 54 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 11:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 56 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 10:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 56 seasmith 06-Jan-20 14:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 53 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 20:46
Re: Sacsayhuaman 50 Open mind 06-Jan-20 16:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Open mind 07-Jan-20 15:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 57 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:25
Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 50 Barbelo 07-Jan-20 23:51
Re: Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 61 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 01:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Open mind 08-Jan-20 00:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 51 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 00:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 01:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 47 Open mind 08-Jan-20 02:06
Re: Sacsayhuaman 55 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 03:20
Re: Sacsayhuaman 69 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 07:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 50 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 12:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 46 Open mind 08-Jan-20 16:42
Re: Sacsayhuaman 52 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 18:24
Re: Sacsayhuaman 42 Open mind 08-Jan-20 20:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 50 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 21:44
LImestone vs Limestone 46 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 22:40
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 58 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 23:47
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 54 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 01:57
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 60 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 03:09
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 61 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 04:07
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 47 Open mind 09-Jan-20 16:06
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 48 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 20:49
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 47 Open mind 09-Jan-20 20:58
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 63 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 21:20
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 46 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:12
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 56 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 17:15
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 48 Open mind 09-Jan-20 15:25
Re:Sacsayhuaman 43 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 07:00
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 41 Open mind 10-Jan-20 13:15
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 63 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 14:34
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 40 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:47
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 47 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 50 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 42 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:00
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 65 Thanos5150 09-Jan-20 01:44
Tombomachay 57 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 06:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 54 Barbelo 10-Jan-20 07:30
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 91 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 11:41
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 63 Barbelo 11-Jan-20 05:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 56 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 01:24
Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 56 Barbelo 12-Jan-20 12:11
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 60 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 20:56
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 67 Open mind 13-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Sacsayhuaman 45 Open mind 08-Jan-20 23:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 50 Open mind 08-Jan-20 14:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 43 Merrell 08-Jan-20 17:57
On the fence... 54 Racho 08-Jan-20 04:51
Re: On the fence... 48 Open mind 08-Jan-20 15:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 66 Merrell 04-Jan-20 09:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 64 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 09:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 65 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 59 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 00:34
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 45 Open mind 05-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 56 Open mind 02-Jan-20 03:37
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 63 Merrell 01-Jan-20 14:10
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 58 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 96 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 87 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:30
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 81 Open mind 22-Dec-19 22:12
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 75 WVK 23-Dec-19 15:21
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 71 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 65 Open mind 23-Dec-19 23:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 22:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 85 seasmith 23-Dec-19 03:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 79 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 07:20
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 80 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 09:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 71 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 85 Hanslune 24-Dec-19 22:35
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 142 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 19:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 147 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 115 Enigcom 02-Jan-20 17:29


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.