Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
Quote
I probably should get off this hobby horse
> soon?

>
>
>
> Up to you.
>
> How long can one continue to ride (in IMHO) a dead
> horse?
>
> This whole rabbit hole has been dug because of one
> simple reason. As one poster put it, "a lack of a
> basic knowledge of geology," or some such term.

Just as well that you have arrived (valued contribution) so you can clearly, specifically, with references, fill in any lack or knowledge gaps.
I am will be grateful!
>
> Your premise is that the Wall Stones are
> reconstituted limestone from the quarry and
> through some lost technology the organic particles
> were removed; crystalline material was added and a
> binder of sorts was used to make the finished
> product.
>
> This scenario is based on your assumption that all
> limestone is a sedimentary rock produced under
> pressure - mostly by the weight of seawater or
> whatever - hence the marine component.
>
> The quarry limestone exhibits these qualities.

Most limestone is formed in such a fashion. I am aware of stalagmites and stalactites and corals etc.
However, you most likely know much more? Let's see, I believe you.
Or is there something else you are alluding too?
>
>
> However, the Wall limestone has no marine material
> and contains a crystalline component.
>
> Why?
>
> Because it is a different limestone.

Most of the analysis of limestone used in ancient construction that I have seen reported and scientifically analysed, Davidovits, or Barsoum et al, DO have marine shells in them.

I noted from just one post in that ATS thread there was a rock section plate which showed none of such.
Where did that analysis come from? EXACTLY?
Can you link me up to other scientific papers discussing the make up of the stone. PLEASE.
>
> The Wall limestone has been created through
> precipitation in freshwater. Not sedimentation.
>
> That is why I directed you to the Water Temple.

So PLEASE be clear, do you think these walls grew themselves or you think it was harvested from caves and shaped OR WHAT?

Is your wisdom so profound and special that you just want to taunt the forum with cryptic clues?
>
> If you understood the process of precipitation,
> you would understand why the pre Inca called them
> Living Stones and my reference to children and
> having a drink.
>
> The reason that the blocks are in random
> configuration is also tied to this natural
> process. As is the density, hence weight of the
> limestone and the hardness, or softness, of the
> stone at certain stages of its life.

Can you confirm or deny whether you are suggesting this arrangement developed in situ like that naturally? Do you think they are natural fissures and the rocks grew due to precipitation?

Do you not think they are man made ? WHAT is the answer????
>
> But that reason would only cause far more blowback
> from diehard Davidovits fans and mainstream
> sceptics.
>
> I will leave you with my initial image from the
> Water Temple. Pay close attention to it. In
> particular the top right of the central mass and
> the oblong block still in the mass at lower left
> of center.
>
> And then ask yourself, "Why would anyone go the
> trouble of shaping all these small stones around
> the central mass, when it would have been far
> easier to remove the front of the central mass and
> use larger uniform blocks for the entire wall?"

If you look at the bottom then you will see the "central mass" is recessed.
I think the external coating geopolymer mix was a faulty mix and has weathered faster over time.

BUT I AM ALL EARS!!! , and extremely interested in your thorough explanation and source research documents (if you have any) , rather than just more cryptic clues.
>
>
>


Seriously interested
Cheers

EDIT PS

Barbelo, if your reluctance to be specific, is in any way related to your somewhat gnostic belief in the spirit world (Angels Demons etc in the higher realm). Then ,please do not let that retard your requested reply.
It will be given fair and serious consideration, and given it is Graham Hancock's site you are likely to get some 'thumbs up admirers and three cheers' but try to provide some evidence for your claims, whatever they are?
Don't be shy!




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Jan-20 00:59 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 1586 Corpuscles 21-Dec-19 17:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 218 Open mind 22-Dec-19 02:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 184 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 05:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 158 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 114 thinkitover 23-Dec-19 10:05
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 194 ocka 22-Dec-19 09:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 149 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 18:01
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 149 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiahuanaco architect named 113 molder 23-Dec-19 22:16
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 112 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:44
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 112 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:47
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 94 Hanslune 25-Dec-19 01:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 143 Thanos5150 25-Dec-19 02:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Hanslune 27-Dec-19 23:09
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 103 Thanos5150 28-Dec-19 17:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 112 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 06:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 97 Merrell 29-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 94 Corpuscles 29-Dec-19 20:31
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 97 Merrell 29-Dec-19 23:54
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 83 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:03
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 80 Merrell 01-Jan-20 10:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 74 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:32
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Open mind 31-Dec-19 19:33
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 73 Merrell 31-Dec-19 23:06
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 88 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 00:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 75 Open mind 01-Jan-20 03:02
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 118 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 04:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 85 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 05:51
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 100 Thanos5150 01-Jan-20 06:59
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 19:40
Basalt Pavers 87 Barbelo 01-Jan-20 21:33
Re: Basalt Pavers 86 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 23:01
Re: Basalt Pavers 75 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 03:36
Re: Basalt Pavers 91 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:42
Re: Basalt Pavers 78 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 06:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 02:17
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 05:03
Basalt Pillar 100 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 07:15
Re: Basalt Pillar 81 Open mind 02-Jan-20 15:43
Re: Basalt Pillar 97 Corpuscles 02-Jan-20 19:06
Re: Basalt Pillar 85 Barbelo 02-Jan-20 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 110 Thanos5150 02-Jan-20 18:08
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Merrell 02-Jan-20 18:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 142 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 11:15
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 92 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 20:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 83 Merrell 03-Jan-20 21:45
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 88 Corpuscles 03-Jan-20 23:23
Sacsayhuaman 95 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 02:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 93 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 03:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 91 Thanos5150 04-Jan-20 03:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 05:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 132 Barbelo 04-Jan-20 11:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 83 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 86 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 20:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 74 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:55
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 21:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 79 Barbelo 05-Jan-20 23:40
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Thanos5150 05-Jan-20 23:59
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 06-Jan-20 01:08
Re: Sacsayhuaman 71 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 02:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 80 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 03:50
Re: Sacsayhuaman 76 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 04:29
Re: Sacsayhuaman 87 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 05:10
Re: Sacsayhuaman 89 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:47
Re: Sacsayhuaman 96 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 16:53
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 19:06
The Limestone Puddle 73 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:27
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Thanos5150 06-Jan-20 21:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 22:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 90 Thanos5150 07-Jan-20 17:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 70 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:48
Re: Sacsayhuaman 69 Open mind 06-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 21:30
Re: Sacsayhuaman 67 Open mind 07-Jan-20 20:43
Re: Sacsayhuaman 66 Open mind 06-Jan-20 13:44
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 11:07
Re: Sacsayhuaman 74 Corpuscles 06-Jan-20 05:16
Re: Sacsayhuaman 74 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 10:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 77 seasmith 06-Jan-20 14:28
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 20:46
Re: Sacsayhuaman 68 Open mind 06-Jan-20 16:41
Re: Sacsayhuaman 69 Barbelo 06-Jan-20 21:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 73 Open mind 07-Jan-20 15:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 84 Corpuscles 07-Jan-20 21:25
Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 70 Barbelo 07-Jan-20 23:51
Re: Nonsensical or Unnecessary? 83 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 01:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Open mind 08-Jan-20 00:36
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 00:58
Re: Sacsayhuaman 75 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 01:12
Re: Sacsayhuaman 67 Open mind 08-Jan-20 02:06
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 03:20
Re: Sacsayhuaman 92 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 07:05
Re: Sacsayhuaman 68 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 12:01
Re: Sacsayhuaman 67 Open mind 08-Jan-20 16:42
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 18:24
Re: Sacsayhuaman 62 Open mind 08-Jan-20 20:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 21:44
LImestone vs Limestone 65 Barbelo 08-Jan-20 22:40
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 81 Corpuscles 08-Jan-20 23:47
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 73 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 01:57
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 79 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 03:09
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 80 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 04:07
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 68 Open mind 09-Jan-20 16:06
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 69 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 20:49
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 66 Open mind 09-Jan-20 20:58
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 83 Barbelo 09-Jan-20 21:20
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 65 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:12
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 78 Corpuscles 09-Jan-20 17:15
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 69 Open mind 09-Jan-20 15:25
Re:Sacsayhuaman 61 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 07:00
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 63 Open mind 10-Jan-20 13:15
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 85 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 14:34
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 62 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:47
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 69 Open mind 10-Jan-20 15:58
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 66 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:07
Re: Re:Sacsayhuaman 63 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 21:00
Re: LImestone vs Limestone 85 Thanos5150 09-Jan-20 01:44
Tombomachay 82 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 06:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 75 Barbelo 10-Jan-20 07:30
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 137 Corpuscles 10-Jan-20 11:41
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 85 Barbelo 11-Jan-20 05:25
Re: Limestone vs Limestone 78 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 01:24
Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 79 Barbelo 12-Jan-20 12:11
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 90 Corpuscles 12-Jan-20 20:56
Re: Now All You Have To Do Is Prove It 94 Open mind 13-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Sacsayhuaman 65 Open mind 08-Jan-20 23:22
Re: Sacsayhuaman 72 Open mind 08-Jan-20 14:23
Re: Sacsayhuaman 62 Merrell 08-Jan-20 17:57
On the fence... 74 Racho 08-Jan-20 04:51
Re: On the fence... 67 Open mind 08-Jan-20 15:24
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 86 Merrell 04-Jan-20 09:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 83 Corpuscles 05-Jan-20 09:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 87 Martin Stower 03-Jan-20 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 78 Corpuscles 04-Jan-20 00:34
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 65 Open mind 05-Jan-20 16:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 80 Open mind 02-Jan-20 03:37
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 84 Merrell 01-Jan-20 14:10
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 78 Corpuscles 01-Jan-20 18:41
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 118 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:13
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 Corpuscles 22-Dec-19 21:30
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 99 Open mind 22-Dec-19 22:12
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 104 WVK 23-Dec-19 15:21
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 93 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 87 Open mind 23-Dec-19 23:22
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 111 Hanslune 22-Dec-19 22:58
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 106 seasmith 23-Dec-19 03:04
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 102 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 07:20
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 101 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 09:43
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 90 Hanslune 23-Dec-19 23:28
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 115 Thanos5150 24-Dec-19 16:53
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 105 Hanslune 24-Dec-19 22:35
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 165 Thanos5150 23-Dec-19 19:29
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 168 Corpuscles 23-Dec-19 21:19
Re: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers 151 Enigcom 02-Jan-20 17:29


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.