Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

We can argue til we are blue in the face about How blocks were moved and why, but we cannot deny the FACT that it took a highly sophisticated society to create and maintain the nationwide infrastructure that this discovery has revealed.

No such "infrastructure" has been "revealed" by Merer's Diary.

The simple fact is that Egyptologists (you) recognize no infrastructure. Even Dr Lehner has ripped the builders out of the builders village and condemned them to sleep on ramps. Therefore the "builders village" is no longer infrastructure. Across the board infrastructure for tombs and construction is noted by its absence. It mustta been ramps as proven by their absence since they were removed when it was completed. They mustta been tombs because no one would remove the bodies and loot unless they were valuable.

It was ALREADY KNOWN that stone for the cladding was hauled across the river because the stone originated at Turah and THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY TO GET IT TO GIZA, unless you believe aliens flew it the other way around the planet.

So what infrastructure are you even talking about? Where are the space ships, ramps, and cranes? Where did the builders sleep? What kind of air did they breath? It was YOUR idea that this discovery means something important or earth shaking. What exactly is it?

Quote

This is where we can learn from them. This is the potential that Scott is obfuscating with his continuing nonsense and blatant disregard for the facts.

What have we learned? What do you believe there might be to learn? Why do you thing Scott Creighton is ignoring ANY FACT AT ALL? What fact do you believe he is ignoring? How is attacking assumptions an "obfuscation"? You (Egyptologists) believe you have all the answers so it's not necessary to say what you mean but just to exchange knowing winks. I've mentioned it before but EVERY SINGLE alt thinks you are wrong and I think you are wrong about EVERY SINGLE thing. Scott Creighton is looking at real evidence instead of beliefs and assumptions. He is looking at the assumptions that underlie Egyptological beliefs. Belief is enough for you and enough for Egyptology. It's not enough for Creight or most alts.

I don't think Creighton is obfuscating, I think you are. I think you and a cabal here are trying to silence opposition to Egyptological assumptions. I think you want to continue your MO of isolating alts and teaming up against them. I think you want to protect your assumptions by any means and will even go so far as to suggest that Merer's Diary proves you were right all along even though every single detail of this diary suggests you might be wrong about everything (including Merer's Diary). And then you pretend I'm off topic. You make me repeat the same damn arguments a million times because you REFUSE TO READ THEM OR CHALLENGE THEM and then you cry I'm repeating myself. Then people wonder why I say it is we who are the stinky footed bumpkins. I think people see what they expect and what they believe and it seems natural to you that primitive and superstitious people can make a pyramid with no infrastructure and lots of superstition.

I don't think it's right that I answer every single question put to me and Egyptology can't be bothered to defend their assumptions, answer eMails, or even to explain why they believe what they do without citing et als.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Nov-19 23:24 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 1674 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 11:13
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 323 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 11:33
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 285 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 13:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 161 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 20:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 248 Thanos5150 30-Oct-19 16:10
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 224 Warwick 30-Oct-19 20:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 257 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 20:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 185 Corpuscles 31-Oct-19 01:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 224 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 11:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 119 Merrell 22-Nov-19 16:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 210 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 13:34
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 201 PB Bytes 19-Nov-19 00:24
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 157 Thanos5150 19-Nov-19 16:55
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 120 engbren 21-Nov-19 11:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 137 Martin Stower 21-Nov-19 14:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 110 engbren 22-Nov-19 11:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 117 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 15:06
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 112 Hanslune 22-Nov-19 15:32
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 118 sfbey 22-Nov-19 18:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 100 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:19
2 responces . . 121 Warwick 22-Nov-19 19:32
Re: 2 responces . . 137 cladking 22-Nov-19 21:14
Re: 2 responces . . 139 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 21:29
Re: 2 responces . . 199 cladking 23-Nov-19 02:14
Deleted the same attempts to get people to respond to him 115 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 04:04
Ah, how rare Cladking hijacking a thread 106 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:18
Re: 2 responces . . 107 Mayavitch 26-Nov-19 22:33
Re: 2 responces . . 81 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 122 PB Bytes 23-Nov-19 17:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 113 Merrell 24-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 131 Lee McGiffen 24-Nov-19 13:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 123 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 101 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 117 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:26
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 97 engbren 25-Nov-19 06:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 109 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 124 cladking 25-Nov-19 17:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 188 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:02
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 101 Merrell 25-Nov-19 09:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 125 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 106 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 108 Merrell 26-Nov-19 17:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 125 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 06:19
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 05:47
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 92 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 97 Merrell 28-Nov-19 10:25
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 93 Merrell 28-Nov-19 14:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 97 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 99 Merrell 28-Nov-19 17:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 95 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 18:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 94 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 20:20
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 89 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 21:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 00:19
Petrie’s Confusion Problem 145 Dr. Troglodyte 01-Dec-19 19:54
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 156 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:51
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 86 Merrell 02-Dec-19 10:03
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 117 Martin Stower 02-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 93 Thanos5150 03-Dec-19 16:54
as far as that goes..... 79 Warwick 03-Dec-19 18:20
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 120 Martin Stower 03-Dec-19 19:32
Tunnel vision 498 Warwick 04-Dec-19 20:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 103 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 21:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 88 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 21:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 115 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 22:28
“. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 155 Martin Stower 29-Nov-19 14:50
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 90 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 19:03
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 85 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:44
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 94 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 01:02
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 92 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 05:31
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 96 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 06:11
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 94 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 12:49
From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 106 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 14:38
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 88 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:34
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 90 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 16:57
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 90 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 17:43
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 86 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:31
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 91 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 18:46
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 88 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:55
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 91 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 19:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 79 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:04
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 92 Merrell 30-Nov-19 21:22
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 83 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:12
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 84 Thanos5150 01-Dec-19 00:25
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 85 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 00:54
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 119 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 01:37
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 91 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 84 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:55
Hawass: other possible slips 97 Merrell 01-Dec-19 15:28
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 88 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 19:16
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 73 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:32
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 92 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:38
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 75 Merrell 30-Nov-19 18:14
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 137 Merrell 25-Nov-19 23:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 106 Thanos5150 26-Nov-19 16:38
Infrastructure . 103 Warwick 26-Nov-19 17:29
What Irony? n/t 89 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:05
do TRY being objective 88 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:14
Re: do TRY being objective 107 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:25
so you choose subjective 97 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:49
Re: so you choose subjective 105 cladking 26-Nov-19 23:17
Re: so you choose subjective 111 Warwick 27-Nov-19 02:51
So You Evade the Subject Again. 163 cladking 27-Nov-19 03:43
Re: So You Evade the Subject Again. 77 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:29
Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 83 cladking 27-Nov-19 18:11
Re: Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 93 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:21
Cladking hijacks another thread and makes it about ramps - again 73 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:39
Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 116 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 12:58
Re: Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 83 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:41
A better idea 79 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 18:12
New from K-tel 87 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:16
Re: New from K-tel 88 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 00:08
Re: New from K-tel 100 Lee McGiffen 28-Nov-19 01:46
Re: New from K-tel 214 cladking 28-Nov-19 01:57
Re: New from K-tel 84 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 16:40
Putting this to bed 88 Warwick 28-Nov-19 18:11
Re: so you choose subjective 88 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 19:11
Re: so you choose subjective 78 Warwick 28-Nov-19 20:44
Classic unintended comedy! 132 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 13:04
Re: Infrastructure . 96 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 00:15
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 99 Merrell 26-Nov-19 18:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 89 Merrell 28-Nov-19 22:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 101 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 03:37
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 74 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:26
Ahket . 120 Warwick 25-Nov-19 17:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 149 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 16:27
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 105 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 00:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 101 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 00:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 110 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:08
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 101 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 05:49
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 105 Merrell 25-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 87 seasmith 25-Nov-19 22:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 82 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 84 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 79 seasmith 25-Nov-19 23:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 79 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:23
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Martin Stower 26-Nov-19 14:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 82 seasmith 27-Nov-19 02:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 96 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 16:59
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 115 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 106 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 17:21
not Graffiti 112 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:47
Re: not Graffiti 119 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 21:51
Monkey see.. 125 Warwick 24-Nov-19 23:40
Re: not Graffiti 137 PB Bytes 24-Nov-19 21:58
Please, for God’s sake, . . . 772 Martin Stower 27-Nov-19 19:52
Mods can you stop Cladking from hijacking this thread? 126 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:41
Mod Warning > General OP Hijacking 160 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-19 17:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.