Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His threshold for calling someone an
> “Egyptologist” has never been high.
>
> The problem with his calling Lorraine Evans one
> was explained to him in this discussion:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Howard_Vyse#The_Great_Pyramid_Hoax
>
>
> M.


Hi M

I have sympathy for any underpinning desire to promote your ( & colleague's) work.

Unfortunately, the modus operandi, of the fringe "alternative" has been perfected to shun any discussion of their wacko theories, and stick exclusively to preaching to the gullible, uniformed, disinterested (in facts) and fantasising fools, far away from critical analysis.

You will note even on his own website, our host, does not contribute ( except, someone posts ,perhaps the real deal?, on AoM a brief welcome to other fringe writers - but some worthy of some time)

I think Lorraine Evans ought enjoy the loosely deemed status as "Egyptologist", despite any lack of specific PhD.
Apparently, she studied such :

Quote
website
Lorraine studied Ancient History, Egyptology and Archaeology at University College London and the University of London respectively. She is currently a Research Fellow at the IIPSGP and is studying for her PhD. She is author of the best-selling book Kingdom of the Ark, together with Warrior Women of Northern Europe and Murder at Medinet Habu - A Heritage Tour Guide, the first in her mini-heritage tour series. Lorraine is at the forefront of historical revisionism

Anyway, you are a PROVEN excellent researcher . I ask is not SC's wife's maiden name "nee - Evans"??????? -mother in law ????
Lorraine claims to reside in London but most of her blog is about Scotland.

LonelyAngel, was and will ever only be a troll! (poor effort at that) A few reasonable witty gutter (grog related) retorts was all he/it was capable of producing!
Creighton's, "independent researchers and "experts" were just naïve pawns and flunkies, in his grand Hoax deception.

It is a pity you pitched the title (of your books Vol I and Vol lI) and the essence biographical content to a relatively unknown (very limited known appeal) individual.
However, Strange Journey Vol I & II

highly recommended to anyone seeking clarification and the facts and the truth.

Taking a bet from LonelyAss?.... and expecting anything but renege? That would be foolish.

As for support for his ideas

I think Graham Hancock ought be utterly ashamed , if he endorsed and actually wrote with his own hand /mind ,this cover promotional rubbish.

Quote
Buaval and Hancock

Bauval:

Egyptologists consider the ochre-painted Khufu cartouche in the Great Pyramid as the ultimate proof that this pyramid belongs to the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. But much controversy surrounds its authenticity. If the Khufu cartouche is indeed a hoax, then the implications are tremendous.

Hancock:

A powerfully-argued demolition of the 'facts' on which Egyptologists base their claim that the Great Pyramid was built by the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. Scott Creighton's excellent new book The Great Pyramid Hoax is a first-class forensic investigation that Egyptologists should really be paying a great deal of attention to, because it pulls the rug of their chronology right out from under their feet.

You will note Bauval was much more guarded and less committed (embellished bold large print mine)
As spelt out CLEARLY in Thanos5150 post

Sad you have to give that name any oxygen. He is a liar and an oxygen thief.

Cheers

Edit: Shocking (bad) grammar correction ( a confusing double negative) but sorry about the remainder?



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 31-Oct-19 04:45 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 1641 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 11:13
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 313 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 11:33
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 269 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 13:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 148 Barbelo 30-Oct-19 20:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 232 Thanos5150 30-Oct-19 16:10
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 212 Warwick 30-Oct-19 20:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 246 Martin Stower 30-Oct-19 20:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 172 Corpuscles 31-Oct-19 01:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 209 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 11:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 107 Merrell 22-Nov-19 16:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 195 Martin Stower 31-Oct-19 13:34
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 188 Poster Boy 19-Nov-19 00:24
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 144 Thanos5150 19-Nov-19 16:55
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 107 engbren 21-Nov-19 11:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 125 Martin Stower 21-Nov-19 14:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 99 engbren 22-Nov-19 11:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 106 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 15:06
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 102 Hanslune 22-Nov-19 15:32
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 102 sfbey 22-Nov-19 18:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 89 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:19
2 responces . . 110 Warwick 22-Nov-19 19:32
Re: 2 responces . . 126 cladking 22-Nov-19 21:14
Re: 2 responces . . 125 Martin Stower 22-Nov-19 21:29
Re: 2 responces . . 189 cladking 23-Nov-19 02:14
Deleted the same attempts to get people to respond to him 104 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 04:04
Ah, how rare Cladking hijacking a thread 95 Hanslune 23-Nov-19 01:18
Re: 2 responces . . 94 Mayavitch 26-Nov-19 22:33
Re: 2 responces . . 72 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 109 Poster Boy 23-Nov-19 17:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 103 Merrell 24-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 110 Lee McGiffen 24-Nov-19 13:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 112 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:28
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 90 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:26
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 85 engbren 25-Nov-19 06:36
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 96 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 112 cladking 25-Nov-19 17:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 177 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:02
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 90 Merrell 25-Nov-19 09:54
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 115 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 16:50
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 91 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:45
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 97 Merrell 26-Nov-19 17:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 112 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 06:19
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 91 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 05:47
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 79 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 87 Merrell 28-Nov-19 10:25
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 82 Merrell 28-Nov-19 14:01
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 86 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 17:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 85 Merrell 28-Nov-19 17:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 83 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 18:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 80 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 20:20
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 76 Corpuscles 28-Nov-19 21:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 93 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 00:19
Petrie’s Confusion Problem 123 Dr. Troglodyte 01-Dec-19 19:54
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 143 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:51
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 73 Merrell 02-Dec-19 10:03
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 106 Martin Stower 02-Dec-19 14:38
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 81 Thanos5150 03-Dec-19 16:54
as far as that goes..... 67 Warwick 03-Dec-19 18:20
Re: Petrie’s Confusion Problem 107 Martin Stower 03-Dec-19 19:32
Tunnel vision 485 Warwick 04-Dec-19 20:18
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 92 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 21:05
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 78 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 21:51
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Martin Stower 28-Nov-19 22:28
“. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 137 Martin Stower 29-Nov-19 14:50
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 79 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 19:03
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 75 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:44
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 80 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 01:02
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 81 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 05:31
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 84 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 06:11
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 82 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 12:49
From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 95 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 14:38
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 77 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:34
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 78 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 16:57
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 79 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 17:43
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 75 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:31
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 80 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 18:46
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 78 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 18:55
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 81 Martin Stower 30-Nov-19 19:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 66 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:04
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 81 Merrell 30-Nov-19 21:22
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 72 Corpuscles 30-Nov-19 23:12
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 73 Thanos5150 01-Dec-19 00:25
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 74 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 00:54
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 107 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 01:37
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 81 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:18
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 75 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 14:55
Hawass: other possible slips 85 Merrell 01-Dec-19 15:28
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 78 Martin Stower 01-Dec-19 19:16
Re: From the site of Andrew Bayuk (“Guardian”) 61 Corpuscles 01-Dec-19 23:32
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 80 Thanos5150 30-Nov-19 16:38
Re: “. . . lost until Zahi Hawass found it . . .” 63 Merrell 30-Nov-19 18:14
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 120 Merrell 25-Nov-19 23:57
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 95 Thanos5150 26-Nov-19 16:38
Infrastructure . 92 Warwick 26-Nov-19 17:29
What Irony? n/t 79 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:05
do TRY being objective 79 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:14
Re: do TRY being objective 97 cladking 26-Nov-19 20:25
so you choose subjective 88 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:49
Re: so you choose subjective 96 cladking 26-Nov-19 23:17
Re: so you choose subjective 102 Warwick 27-Nov-19 02:51
So You Evade the Subject Again. 150 cladking 27-Nov-19 03:43
Re: So You Evade the Subject Again. 68 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:29
Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 74 cladking 27-Nov-19 18:11
Re: Egyptologists Couldn't Find a Ramp with Both Hands. 84 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:21
Cladking hijacks another thread and makes it about ramps - again 64 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:39
Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 101 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 12:58
Re: Cladking logic: If you disagree with me you are an Egyptologist! 73 Warwick 27-Nov-19 17:41
A better idea 68 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 18:12
New from K-tel 76 Warwick 27-Nov-19 18:16
Re: New from K-tel 78 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 00:08
Re: New from K-tel 82 Lee McGiffen 28-Nov-19 01:46
Re: New from K-tel 205 cladking 28-Nov-19 01:57
Re: New from K-tel 75 Hanslune 28-Nov-19 16:40
Putting this to bed 78 Warwick 28-Nov-19 18:11
Re: so you choose subjective 77 Thanos5150 28-Nov-19 19:11
Re: so you choose subjective 68 Warwick 28-Nov-19 20:44
Classic unintended comedy! 121 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 13:04
Re: Infrastructure . 86 Thanos5150 27-Nov-19 00:15
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 87 Merrell 26-Nov-19 18:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 78 Merrell 28-Nov-19 22:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 90 Thanos5150 29-Nov-19 03:37
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 62 Merrell 29-Nov-19 20:26
Ahket . 110 Warwick 25-Nov-19 17:56
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 139 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 16:27
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 90 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 00:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 91 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 00:53
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 99 Thanos5150 25-Nov-19 02:08
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 90 Hanslune 25-Nov-19 05:49
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 94 Merrell 25-Nov-19 10:12
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 77 seasmith 25-Nov-19 22:09
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 71 Warwick 25-Nov-19 22:31
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 76 Merrell 25-Nov-19 22:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 70 seasmith 25-Nov-19 23:11
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 67 Warwick 26-Nov-19 20:23
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 95 Martin Stower 26-Nov-19 14:35
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 72 seasmith 27-Nov-19 02:48
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 87 Poster Boy 24-Nov-19 16:59
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 104 Thanos5150 24-Nov-19 14:07
Re: Mainstream endorsement of Creighton’s HOAX . . . 95 Poster Boy 24-Nov-19 17:21
not Graffiti 101 Warwick 24-Nov-19 19:47
Re: not Graffiti 109 Hanslune 24-Nov-19 21:51
Monkey see.. 114 Warwick 24-Nov-19 23:40
Re: not Graffiti 125 Poster Boy 24-Nov-19 21:58
Please, for God’s sake, . . . 763 Martin Stower 27-Nov-19 19:52
Mods can you stop Cladking from hijacking this thread? 116 Hanslune 27-Nov-19 23:41
Mod Warning > General OP Hijacking 143 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-19 17:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.