Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
thinkitover Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First, in Treasures of the Pyramids in the
> chapter on pyramidia, Zahi Hawass states
>
> "Many people believed that the pyramid of
> Khafre never had a pyramidion because they thought
> that the casing of white limestone continued to
> the top of the pyramid, However, Italian scholars
> Maragioglio and Rinaldi surveyed the top of this
> pyramid and pointed out that the summit of the
> pyramid had been destroyed and now ended in a
> small platform. Another Italian expedition
> recently surveyed this pyramid to assess damage
> from an earthquake. They discovered that the
> casing stone of the top is only five centimeters
> thick, which is different from all the other
> pyramids at Giza."


Thanks again everyone for the interesting links and info. I thought I'd come back to this since I think what Hawass is talking about here must be what's published in The Structural Behavior of the Chephren Pyramid by G. Croci and M. Biritognolo [isida-project.org]

Unfortunately I don't think it's quite what I'd hoped for from Hawass' description and context. I was hoping he meant there was an intact five centimeter layer on the platform that might have indicated a transition to a pyramidion and whose width would describe the pyramidion's base width, but it sounds like Croci and Biritognolo were talking about the casing on the sides.

Apparently there may be a misprint in Croci and Britognolo's text?

"The original very top part (about 7 meters in height) of the Pyramid is now missing and the monument ends at the actual top in a platform of about 4 meters of size"

Conserving a perimeter/height ratio of 6, a missing section would have a width of 42 meters rather than 4, and 4 meters width would give a height of about 2.6666 m; 4 meters wide and 7 meters high would give a perimeter/height ratio of only about 2.2857 rather than 6.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Oct-19 11:00 by thinkitover.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Giza Pyramid Questions 1057 thinkitover 05-Sep-19 23:21
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 157 Hanslune 06-Sep-19 00:21
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 155 Lee McGiffen 06-Sep-19 04:08
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 124 cladking 06-Sep-19 13:42
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 99 cloister 06-Sep-19 14:35
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 114 Thanos5150 06-Sep-19 15:06
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 127 Spiros 06-Sep-19 15:10
Subsidiary Pyramids G3-b and G3-c: Were They Cased? 85 thinkitover 20-Sep-19 21:55
Re: Subsidiary Pyramids G3-b and G3-c: Were They Cased? 85 Sirfiroth 20-Sep-19 22:18
Re: Subsidiary Pyramids G3-b and G3-c: Were They Cased? 75 thinkitover 24-Sep-19 19:02
Re: Subsidiary Pyramids G3-b and G3-c: Were They Cased? 43 Spiros 11-Oct-19 13:34
You're Right, I Mixed Them Up 183 thinkitover 15-Oct-19 02:56
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 57 thinkitover 11-Oct-19 10:59
Re: Giza Pyramid Questions 58 Trevorjjj 11-Oct-19 13:37


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.