...Again, I am not defending Sitchin. Alls I'm saying is Hieser deserves scrutiny in his own right
Fair enough, and you do seem like a thinking person. So, with that in mind, if I may ask, Where if anywhere do you see Stichen fitting in a legit historical discussion?
PB - At this point I would be mainly interested in what you think of certain of his key terms, such as annunaki... When we throw out the missing planet, and focus on the other stuff, it seems that a lot of his ideas converge on the interpretation of such terms. If legit, they tend to compliment various alternativist schools (as I recall). So, when it comes to such things do you think his use of key terms is within mainstream acceptability? Are they highly plausible, in your opinion, even though they might be prejudicially ignored? One sees that in a lot of areas, including 2012. John Major Jenkins would be a very good example of that, imo: [grahamhancock.com].
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 18-Jul-19 15:20 by Poster Boy.