Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Race Jackson Wrote:
> Right. But you are thinking like a person from a
> 21st century industrial civilization. The
> civilization that built these was not industrial.
> They were very much a hand tool level
> civilization. Communication was mostly verbal,
> most people would have been illiterate. Knowledge
> and processes would have been done by
> demonstration, at the local level. And the
> sophistication of communication depends upon
> vocabulary.
> Take your sentence: "I'm thinking 'casting' in
> terms of repetitive manufacturing as opposed to
> in-situ moulding, as in construction." Do you
> think you could even translate the words of that
> sentence into their language? I doubt it. They
> lacked the vocabulary. And so they lacked the
> thought processes that depend upon vocabulary.

If they could make an accurate wooden mould, which was then used to make concrete blocks.
Then what's so difficult about making one wooden pattern (a positive), from which numerous moulds (negatives) could readily be made, from which even more numerous blocks (positives) could be made?

I think they did have the thought processes. (The 'pattern first' process pre dates the industrial era by millennia). I also think they had enough of those thought processes to build up a wooden positive pattern from blocks and flats. If you analyse an H block you can clearly see how they are built up..

The difficulty was always in understanding their wet moulding materials techniques and technologies. That 'difficulty' now seems to have been removed.

The remaining difficulty would be in understanding how they achieved through measurement, and transfer of measurement the extreme flatness and uniformity of the surfaces.
I'm pretty sure they didn't have access to precision measuring instruments with which to make their flat planar surfaced patterns and/or moulds.
Instruments similar to the precision measuring instruments that we need to use today, without which, we today couldn't even begin to measure and therefore recognise their achievement in precision flatness.
Flatness, whether it be in a pattern, mould or block doesn't come easily.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Geopolymers - Scientific evidence of poored megalyths in Peru! 1259 c-rogers 16-Mar-19 08:57
Excellent video evidence 301 Race Jackson 16-Mar-19 16:08
Re: Excellent video evidence 149 Holger Isenberg 21-Apr-19 22:41
Mod Note > Topic Moved 250 Dr. Troglodyte 16-Mar-19 18:34
Terrific! 280 drrayeye 18-Mar-19 02:26
Re: Terrific! 386 Hanslune 18-Mar-19 03:35
Sizes 214 Race Jackson 20-Mar-19 00:49
Re: Sizes 186 Dr. Troglodyte 20-Mar-19 16:12
Re: Sizes 200 Jon Ellison 20-Mar-19 19:27
Re: Sizes 191 Jon Ellison 20-Mar-19 21:16
Wood 171 Race Jackson 20-Mar-19 22:31
Re: Wood 204 Jon Ellison 21-Mar-19 00:45
Re: Wood 167 Race Jackson 21-Mar-19 13:58
Re: Wood 201 Thunderbird 21-Mar-19 15:55
Re: Wood 250 Jon Ellison 21-Mar-19 16:23
Re: Wood 230 WVK 26-Mar-19 12:34
Re: Wood 193 Open mind 23-Mar-19 18:37
Re: Wood 148 Race Jackson 25-Mar-19 21:39
Re: Wood 158 Open mind 25-Mar-19 23:37
Discussing only Peru and evidence from video 215 Race Jackson 26-Mar-19 03:20
Re: Terrific! 314 Thanos5150 20-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Terrific! 263 drrayeye 24-Mar-19 07:11
Re: Terrific! 260 WVK 25-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Geopolymers - Scientific evidence of poored megalyths in Peru! 343 Open mind 20-Mar-19 01:51
Re: Geopolymers - Scientific evidence of poored megalyths in Peru! 162 Holger Isenberg 21-Apr-19 22:46
Re: Geopolymers - Scientific evidence of poored megalyths in Peru! 211 Open mind 23-Apr-19 02:22
Re: Geopolymers - Scientific evidence of poored megalyths in Peru! 142 Holger Isenberg 21-Apr-19 22:23

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.