LonelyAngel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Have you travelled the 17 km yet, dragged him out
> > from under his bed, taken the selfie with your
> > idol, . . .
>
> That 17km figure is very exact... and completely
> wrong. Is your error based on something I said or
> has a little Internet mole been feeding you false
> information?

It’s a conspiracy. The Jason Colavitos are behind it.

> You can go drag Scott where you like. Good luck
> with that.

As you have implicitly addressed this to both of us, I must state that I for one do not share your particular interest in him.

> But - mainly - what is it with you and Stower? On
> the Internet well after midnight, trying to
> pressure someone online into sending you a
> "selfie" and desperate to find out where they
> live.
>
> I'll repeat that: trying to pressure someone
> online into sending you a "selfie" and desperate
> to find out where they live.

I suggest you take this up with your idol:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,348061,348432

“Do your own research, Stower. That’s what you told me to do. You’re in South London. What—an hour or so to the British Museum to check it out.”

Which being evidence (to spell it out) of a failed attempt to find out where I live.

> Think about that.

I dare say we have. Certainly I have. It’s misrepresentation. I didn’t ask you to send me a selfie; neither did Corpuscles. I put it to you that it would be easy to obtain one (of you and Creighton together) and then put it online, where everyone could see it. No further details required: just Creighton’s signed declaration that you had proven to him that you are who you say you are. It would be easy, yet we find you strangely reluctant to score more points in one go than in all of your laboured ad hominems put together.

Why is that?

> Thank God we have Mods to protect us from this
> type of invasive personal stuff eh?
>
> After all, we wouldn't want someone announcing
> where someone works - where we tracked them down
> to - because that would virtually be stalking and
> bordering on intimidation. And no one would be
> giving out personal details or IP numbers behind
> the scenes.
>
> That wouldn't happen on here would it? . . .

You tell us, seeing as how you’re expounding on what goes on “behind the scenes”.

And again, the point of the selfie proposal is that it obviates any need for giving out such details.

M.

Edited 2019-02-23 to fix a one-letter typo.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-19 13:12 by Martin Stower.