Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think that with over a decade of ,
> conjuring up his conjectures, that Scott Creighton
> somehow was unaware of the limited state of
> knowledge of hieroglyphics in 1837, and therefore
> extreme limitations on Vyse & team?
>

> Pyramid as claimed on the back cover of his
> HOAX.
>


C, I can only reply there really is an answer to that, an explanation which actually makes more sense than the "accepted" version of events - it is IN the book, and not accurately described in the blurb on the back (which is not always written by the author).

One of the strengths of the book - the strength of the case overall - is that Scott takes a holistic approach. It's almost impossible to argue this case on limited, out of context details: it's the full picture that would make an everyman like me sitting on a jury convict Vyse.

Seriously though, you cannot be arguing to this extent based on the marketing blurb on the back of the book.

I'm not telling you to buy it, but I would ask that you read it before assailing me of all people about things I can give my opinion on but did not author.

Surely it is still available on SCRIBD, in which case Martin or Warwick could perhaps point you in the right direction or forward a PDF copy?